Advertisement

Acta Applicandae Mathematicae

, Volume 129, Issue 1, pp 1–21 | Cite as

Modelling of an Homogeneous Equilibrium Mixture Model (HEM)

  • A. Bernard-ChampmartinEmail author
  • O. Poujade
  • J. Mathiaud
  • J.-M. Ghidaglia
Article

Abstract

We present here a model for two phase flows which is simpler than the 6-equations models (with two densities, two velocities, two temperatures) but more accurate than the standard mixture models with 4 equations (with two densities, one velocity and one temperature). We are interested in the case when the two-phases have been interacting long enough for the drag force to be small but still not negligible. The so-called Homogeneous Equilibrium Mixture Model (HEM) that we present is dealing with both mixture and relative quantities, allowing in particular to follow both a mixture velocity and a relative velocity. This relative velocity is not tracked by a conservation law but by a closure law (drift relation), whose expression is related to the drag force terms of the two-phase flow. After the derivation of the model, a stability analysis and numerical experiments are presented.

Keywords

Mixture model Drift closure Two phase flows Darcy law 

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

76T10 76N99 65Z05 65M06 41A60 

Notes

Acknowledgements

A.B.C. acknowledges partial support of ANR CBDif-Fr, Collective behaviour & diffusion: mathematical models and simulations ANR-08-BLAN-0333-01.

References

  1. 1.
    Ambroso, A., Chalons, C., Coquel, F., Galié, T., Godlewski, E., Raviart, P.A., Seguin, N.: The drift-flux asymptotic limit of barotropic two-phase two-pressure models. Commun. Math. Sci. 6(2), 521–529 (2008) CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baranger, C.: Modélisation, étude mathématique et simulation des collisions dans les fluides complexes. PhD thesis, École Normale Supérieure de Cachan—ENS Cachan (2004) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baudin, M., Berthon, C., Coquel, F., Masson, R., Tran, Q.H.: A relaxation method for two-phase flow models with hydrodynamic closure law. Numer. Math. 99(3), 411–440 (2005) CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bendiksen, K.H., Maines, D., Moe, R., Nuland, S.: The dynamic two-fluid model OLGA: theory and application. SPE Prod. Eng. 6(2), 171–180 (1991) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bestion, D.: The physical closure laws in the Cathare code. Nucl. Eng. Des. 124(3), 229–245 (1990) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boudin, L., Desvillettes, L., Motte, R.: A modeling of compressible droplets in a fluid. Commun. Math. Sci. 1(4), 657–669 (2003) CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Caramana, E.J., Shashkov, M.J., Whalen, P.P.: Formulations of artificial viscosity for multi-dimensional shock wave computations. J. Comput. Phys. 144(1), 70–97 (1998) CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Champmartin, A.: Modélisation et étude numérique d’écoulements diphasiques: modélisation d’un écoulement homogène équilibré: modélisation des collisions entre gouttelettes à l’aide d’un modèle simplifié de type BGK. PhD thesis, École Normale Supérieure de Cachan—ENS Cachan. http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00598571/, February 2011
  9. 9.
    Drew, D.A., Passman, S.L.: Theory of Multicomponent Fluids. Applied Mathematical Sciences, vol. 135. Springer, New York (1999) Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dukowicz, J.K.: A particle-fluid numerical model for liquid sprays. J. Comput. Phys. 35(2), 229–253 (1980) CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Enwald, H., Peirano, E., Almstedt, A.E.: Eulerian two-phase flow theory applied to fluidization. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 22, 21–66 (1996) CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Faille, I., Heintzé, E.: A rough finite volume scheme for modeling two-phase flow in a pipeline. Comput. Fluids 28(2), 213–241 (1999) CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fjelde, K.K., Karlsen, K.H.: High-resolution hybrid primitive-conservative upwind schemes for the drift flux model. Comput. Fluids 31(3), 335–367 (2002) CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    França, F., Lahey, R.T. Jr.: The use of drift-flux techniques for the analysis of horizontal two-phase flows. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 18(6), 787–801 (1992) CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Galié, T.: Couplage interfacial de modèles en dynamique des fluides. Application aux écoulements diphasiques. PhD thesis, Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris VI (2009) Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ghidaglia, J.M., Poujade, O.: Modélisation d’écoulements fluide-particules par des modèles Euler-Euler conservatifs. Technical report, Eurobios (2006) Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Guillard, H., Duval, F.: A Darcy law for the drift velocity in a two-phase flow model. J. Comput. Phys. 224(1), 288–313 (2007). Special issue dedicated to professor Piet Wesseling on the occasion of his retirement from Delft University of Technology CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Guillard, H., Duval, F., Latche, J.C., Panescu, R.: Numerical multiphase modeling of bubbly flows. Ann. Univ. Ferrara 53(2), 243–253 (2007) CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hibiki, T., Ishii, M.: One-dimensional drift-flux model and constitutive equations for relative motion between phases in various two-phase flow regimes. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 46(25), 4935–4948 (2003) CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ishii, M.: One-dimensional drift-flux model and constitutive equations for relative motion between phases in various two-phase flow regimes. Technical Report ANL-77-47, Argonne National Lab Report (1977) Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ishii, M., Hibiki, T.: Thermo-Fluid Dynamics of Two-Phase Flow. Springer, New York (2006) CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ishii, M., Zuber, N.: Drag coefficient and relative velocity in bubbly, droplet or particulate flows. AIChE J. 25(5), 843–855 (1979) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Longest, P.W., Oldham, M.J.: Numerical and experimental deposition of fine respiratory aerosols: development of a two-phase drift flux model with near-wall velocity corrections. J. Aerosol Sci. 39(1), 48–70 (2008) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Manninen, M.: On the mixture model for multiphase flow. VTT Publications, Technical Research Centre of Finland, 288 (1996) Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Masella, J.M., Tran, Q.H., Ferre, D., Pauchon, C.: Transient simulation of two-phase flows in pipes. Int. J. Multiph. Flow 24(5), 739–755 (1998) CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mathiaud, J.: Étude de systèmes de type gaz-particules. PhD thesis, École Normale Supérieure de Cachan—ENS Cachan (2006) Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    O’Rourke, P.: Collective drop effects on vaporizing liquid sprays. PhD thesis, Princeton University (1981) Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Panescu, R.: Modélisation Eulerienne d’écoulements diphasiques à phase dispersée et simulation numérique par une méthode volumes—éléments finis. PhD thesis, Université de Nice Sophia Antipolis (2006) Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ramos, D.: Quelques résultats mathématiques et simulations numériques d’écoulements régis par des modèles bifluides. PhD thesis, École Normale Supérieure de Cachan—ENS Cachan (2000) Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Raymond, P.: Flica 4: A computer code for multidimensional thermal analysis of nuclear reactor core, numerical methods for three-dimensional two-phase flow. Technical Report CEA-CONF-9030, Report CEA (1987) Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Roe, P.L.: Characteristic-based schemes for the Euler equations. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 18, 337–365 (1986) CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Romenski, E., Toro, E.F.: Compressible two-phase flows: two-pressure models and numerical methods. Technical report, Isaac Newton Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Cambridge University, UK, Laboratory of Applied Mathematics, Faculty of Engineering, 38050, University of Trento, Italy (2004) Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Schlegel, J., Hibiki, T., Ishii, M.: Development of a comprehensive set of drift-flux constitutive models for pipes of various hydraulic diameters. Prog. Nucl. Energy 52(7), 666–677 (2010) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sheppard, C.M., Morris, S.D.: Drift-flux correlation disengagement models: Part 1—Theory: analytic and numeric integration details. J. Hazard. Mater. 44(2–3), 111–125 (1995). Consequence Modeling for Plant Safety and Environmental Impact CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sokolichin, A., Eigenberger, G., Lapin, A.: Simulation of buoyancy driven bubbly flow: established simplifications and open questions. AIChE J. 50, 24–45 (2004) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Staedtke, H., Franchello, G., Worth, B., Graf, U., Romstedt, P., Kumbaro, A., García-Cascales, J., Paillère, H., Deconinck, H., Ricchiuto, M., Smith, B., De Cachard, F., Toro, E.F., Romenski, E., Mimouni, S.: Advanced three-dimensional two-phase flow simulation tools for application to reactor safety (astar). Nucl. Eng. Des. 235(2–4), 379–400 (2005) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Stewart, H.B., Wendroff, B.: Two-phase flow: models and methods. J. Comput. Phys. 56(3), 363–409 (1984) CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Van Leer, B.: Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme. 5. A second-order sequel to Godunov’s method. J. Comput. Phys. 32(1), 101–136 (1979) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wallis, G.: One Dimensional Two-Phase Flow. McGraw-Hill, New York (1969) Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Woodward, P., Colella, P.: The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks. J. Comput. Phys. 54(1), 115–173 (1984) CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Youngs, D.L.: Numerical simulation of turbulent mixing by Rayleigh-Taylor instability. Physica D 12(1–3), 32–44 (1984) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Youngs, D.L.: Modelling turbulent mixing by Rayleigh-Taylor instability. Physica D 37(1–3), 270–287 (1989) CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zuber, N., Findlay, J.A.: Average volumetric concentration in two-phase flow systems. J. Heat Transf. 87, 453–468 (1965) CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Bernard-Champmartin
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    Email author
  • O. Poujade
    • 1
  • J. Mathiaud
    • 1
    • 2
  • J.-M. Ghidaglia
    • 2
  1. 1.CEA, DAM, DIFArpajonFrance
  2. 2.CMLA, ENS Cachan, CNRS, UniverSudCachanFrance
  3. 3.INRIA Sophia Antipolis MéditerranéeSophia Antipolis CedexFrance
  4. 4.LRC MESO, ENS Cachan/CEA, DAM, DIFCachan CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations