Skip to main content
Log in

Human Lumbar Spine Responses from Vertical Loading: Ranking of Forces Via Brier Score Metrics and Injury Risk Curves

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Biomedical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was conducted to quantify the human tolerance from inferior to superior impacts to whole lumbar spinal columns excised from 43 post mortem human subjects. The specimens were fixed at the ends, aligned in a consistent seated posture, load cells were attached to the proximal and distal ends of the fixation, and the impact was applied using a custom accelerator device. Pretest X-rays and computed tomography (CT) scans, prepositioned X-rays, and posttest X-rays, CT scans and dissection data were used to identify injuries. Right, left, and interval censoring processes were used for the survival analysis, 16 were right censored, 24 were interval censored, and three were left censored observations. Force-based injury risk curves were developed, and the optimal metric describing the underlying response to injury was identified using the Brier score metric. Material, geometry (disc and body areas), and demographic covariates were included in the analysis. The distal force was found to be optimal metric. The bone mineral density was a significant covariate for distal and proximal forces. Both material and geometrical factors affected the transmitted force in this mode of loading. These quantified data serve as the first set of human lumbar spinal column injury risk curves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akaike, A. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 19:716–723, 1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brier, G. W. Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Mon. Weather Rev. 78:1–3, 1950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Comstock, S., D. Pannell, M. Talbot, L. Compton, N. Withers, and H. C. Tien. Spinal injuries after improvised explosive device incidents: implications for Tactical Combat Casualty Care. J. Trauma 71:S413–S417, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. DeVogel, N., A. Banerjee, and N. Yoganandan. Application of resampling techniques to improve the quality of survival analysis risk curves for human frontal bone fracture. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon). 64:28–34, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Duma, S. M., A. R. Kemper, D. M. McNeely, P. G. Brolinson, and F. Matsuoka. Biomechanical response of the lumbar spine in dynamic compression. Biomed. Sci. Instrum. 42:476–481, 2006.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fredrickson, B. E., K. A. Mann, H. A. Yuan, and J. P. Lubicky. Reduction of the intracanal fragment in experimental burst fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13:267–271, 1988.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hansson, T., and B. Roos. The influence of age, height, and weight on the bone mineral content of lumbar vertebrae. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 5:545–551, 1980.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hansson, T., B. Roos, and A. Nachemson. The bone mineral content and ultimate compressive strength of lumbar vertebrae. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 5:46–55, 1980.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaufman, R. P., R. P. Ching, M. M. Willis, C. D. Mack, J. A. Gross, and E. M. Bulger. Burst fractures of the lumbar spine in frontal crashes. Accid. Anal. Prev. 59:153–163, 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim, B. G., J. M. Dan, and D. E. Shin. Treatment of thoracolumbar fracture. Asian Spine J. 9:133–146, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuppa, S., R. H. Eppinger, F. McKoy, T. Nguyen, F. A. Pintar, and N. Yoganandan. Development of side impact thoracic injury criteria and their application to the modified ES-2 dummy with rib extensions (ES-2re). Stapp Car Crash J. 47:189–210, 2003.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lehman, Jr, R. A., H. Paik, T. T. Eckel, M. D. Helgeson, P. B. Cooper, and C. Bellabarba. Low lumbar burst fractures: a unique fracture mechanism sustained in our current overseas conflicts. Spine J. 12:784–790, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Loftis, K. L., E. L. Mazuchowski, M. C. Clouser, and P. J. Gillich. Prominent injury types in vehicle underbody blast. Mil. Med. 184:261–264, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maiman, D. J., N. Yoganandan, and F. A. Pintar. Preinjury cervical alignment affecting spinal trauma. J. Neurosurg. 97:57–62, 2002.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Makhsous, M., F. Lin, R. W. Hendrix, M. Hepler, and L.Q. Zhang. Sitting with adjustable ischial and back supports: biomechanical changes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28: 1113–1121; discussion 1121–1122, 2003.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mosekilde, L., and L. Mosekilde. Normal vertebral body size and compressive strength: relations to age and to vertebral and iliac trabecular bone compressive strength. Bone 7:207–212, 1986.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Oxland, T. R. Fundamental biomechanics of the spine—what we have learned in the past 25 years and future directions. J. Biomech. 49:817–832, 2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Parr, W. C. A note on the jackknife, the bootstrap and the delta method estimators of bias and variance. Biometrika 70:719–722, 1983.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Petitjean, A., X. Torsseille, N. Yoganandan, and F. A. Pintar. Normalization and scaling for human response corridors and development of risk curves. In: Accidental Injury: Biomechanics and Prevention, edited by N. Yoganandan, A. M. Nahum, and J. W. Melvin. New York: Springer, 2015, pp. 769–792.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pintar, F. A., N. Yoganandan, D. J. Maiman, M. Scarboro, and R. W. Rudd. Thoracolumbar spine fractures in frontal impact crashes. Ann. Adv. Automot Med. 56:277–283, 2012.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ragel, B. T., C. D. Allred, S. Brevard, R. T. Davis, and E. H. Frank. Fractures of the thoracolumbar spine sustained by soldiers in vehicles attacked by improvised explosive devices. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:2400–2405, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Reed, M. P., and S. M. Ebert. The Seated Soldier Study: Posture and Body Shape in Vehicle Seats. Washington DC: National Technical Information Service, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Salzmann, S. N., T. Shirahata, J. Yang, C. O. Miller, B. B. Carlson, C. Rentenberger, J. A. Carrino, J. Shue, A. A. Sama, F. P. Cammisa, et al. Regional bone mineral density differences measured by quantitative computed tomography: does the standard clinically used L1-L2 average correlate with the entire lumbosacral spine? Spine J. 19:695–702, 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schoenfeld, A. J., G. P. Goodman, and P. J. Belmont, Jr. Characterization of combat-related spinal injuries sustained by a US Army Brigade Combat Team during Operation Iraqi Freedom. Spine J. 12:771–776, 2012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stemper, B. D., S. G. Storvik, N. Yoganandan, J. L. Baisden, R. J. Fijalkowski, F. A. Pintar, B. S. Shender, and G. R. Paskoff. A new PMHS model for lumbar spine injuries during vertical acceleration. J. Biomech. Eng. 133:081002, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Willen, J., S. Lindahl, L. Irstam, B. Aldman, and A. Nordwall. The thoracolumbar crush fracture. An experimental study on instant axial dynamic loading: the resulting fracture type and its stability. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 9:624–631, 1984.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoganandan, N., D. J. Maiman, F. A. Pintar, G. J. Bennett, and S. J. Larson. Biomechanical effects of laminectomy on thoracic spine stability. Neurosurgery. 32:604–610, 1993.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Yoganandan, N., J. Moore, F. A. Pintar, A. Banerjee, N. DeVogel, and J. Zhang. Role of disc area and trabecular bone density on lumbar spinal column fracture risk curves under vertical impact. J. Biomech. 72:90–98, 2018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yoganandan, N., F. A. Pintar, J. Moore, and D. J. Maiman. Sensitivity of THOR and Hybrid III dummy lower neck loads to belt systems in frontal impact. Traffic Inj Prev. 12:88–95, 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yoganandan, N., F. A. Pintar, M. Schlick, J. R. Humm, L. Voo, A. Merkle, and M. Kleinberger. Vertical accelerator device to apply loads simulating blast environments in the military to human surrogates. J. Biomech. 48:3534–3538, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Yoganandan, N., F. A. Pintar, B. D. Stemper, J. L. Baisden, R. Aktay, B. S. Shender, G. Paskoff, and P. Laud. Trabecular bone density of male human cervical and lumbar vertebrae. Bone 39:336–344, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yoganandan, N., B. D. Stemper, J. L. Baisden, F. A. Pintar, G. R. Paskoff, and B. S. Shender. Effects of acceleration level on lumbar spine injuries in military populations. Spine J. 15:1318–1324, 2015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research study was supported in part by the Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Research, and DoD grant W81XWH-16-01-0010. This material is the result of work supported with resources and use of facilities at the Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin and Medical College of Wisconsin. The first and fourth authors are part time employees of the Zablocki VA Medical Center. This work was performed as part of the Biomechanics Product Team led by the Johns Hopkins Applied Physic Laboratory (JHU/APL) and supported under contract W911QX-17-D-0006, sponsored by the U.S. Army Research Lab in support of the WIAMan Program. Contributions of the WIAMan Engineering Office, staff of the Neuroscience Research Laboratories at the Medical College of Wisconsin, and engineers at JHU/APL are acknowledged. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policy of the U. S. Government, the Department of Defense (or its branches), or the Department of the Army. The project described was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Award Number UL1TR001436. The content is solely the responsibility of the author(s) and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. This project is funded by the Research and Education Program Fund, a component of the Advancing a Healthier Wisconsin Endowment at the Medical College of Wisconsin.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Narayan Yoganandan.

Additional information

Associate Editor Jane Grande-Allen oversaw the review of this article.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Figure A1–A6.

Figure A1–A6
figure 9

Images from left to right: A1—coronal CT scan before the test, A2—coronal CT scan after the test showing injuries at the upper lumbar vertebrae, A3—photograph of the specimen in the coronal plane after the test showing injuries, although to a less demonstrable extent at the inferior level, A4—sagittal CT scan before the test, A5—sagittal CT scan after the test, and A6—photograph of the specimen in the sagittal plane after the test. Note that the CT images are more effective in showing the pathology in both planes.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoganandan, N., DeVogel, N., Moore, J. et al. Human Lumbar Spine Responses from Vertical Loading: Ranking of Forces Via Brier Score Metrics and Injury Risk Curves. Ann Biomed Eng 48, 79–91 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02363-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-019-02363-5

Keywords

Navigation