Annals of Biomedical Engineering

, Volume 46, Issue 5, pp 726–735 | Cite as

UROKIN: A Software to Enhance Our Understanding of Urogenital Motion

  • Catriona S. Czyrnyj
  • Michel R. Labrosse
  • Ryan B. Graham
  • Linda McLean
Article
  • 68 Downloads

Abstract

Transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) allows for objective quantification of mid-sagittal urogenital mechanics, yet current practice omits dynamic motion information in favor of analyzing only a rest and a peak motion frame. This work details the development of UROKIN, a semi-automated software which calculates kinematic curves of urogenital landmark motion. A proof of concept analysis, performed using UROKIN on TPUS video recorded from 20 women with and 10 women without stress urinary incontinence (SUI) performing maximum voluntary contraction of the pelvic floor muscles. The anorectal angle and bladder neck were tracked while the motion of the pubic symphysis was used to compensate for the error incurred by TPUS probe motion during imaging. Kinematic curves of landmark motion were generated for each video and curves were smoothed, time normalized, and averaged within groups. Kinematic data yielded by the UROKIN software showed statistically significant differences between women with and without SUI in terms of magnitude and timing characteristics of the kinematic curves depicting landmark motion. Results provide insight into the ways in which UROKIN may be useful to study differences in pelvic floor muscle contraction mechanics between women with and without SUI and other pelvic floor disorders. The UROKIN software improves on methods described in the literature and provides unique capacity to further our understanding of urogenital biomechanics.

Keywords

Stress urinary incontinence Pelvic floor muscles Maximum voluntary contraction Urogenital kinematics 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Kevin Varette, P.T. for his contributions to the data acquisition. This work was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR-IRSC 0076433) and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC 05256).

References

  1. 1.
    Abrams, P., K. Avery, N. Gardener, and J. Donovan. The international consultation on incontinence modular questionnaire: www.iciq.net. J. Urol. 175(3):1063–1066, 2006.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00348-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Costantini, S., F. Esposito, C. Nadalini, et al. Ultrasound imaging of the female perineum: the effect of vaginal delivery on pelvic floor dynamics. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 27(2):183–187, 2006.  https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.2663.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    DeLancey, J. O. L. Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: the hammock hypothesis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 170(6):1713–1723, 1994.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(94)70346-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Delancey, J. O., and J. A. Ashton-miller. Pathophysiology of adult urinary incontinence. Gastroenterology. 126(6):S23–S32, 2004.  https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.080.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    DeLancey, J. O. L., J. M. Miller, R. Kearney, et al. Vaginal birth and de novo stress incontinence. Obstet. Gynecol. 110(2, Part 1):354–362, 2007.  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000270120.60522.55.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dietz, H. P., M. J. Bernardo, A. Kirby, and K. L. Shek. Minimal criteria for the diagnosis of avulsion of the puborectalis muscle by tomographic ultrasound. Int. Urogynecol. J. 22(6):699–704, 2011.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-010-1329-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dietz, H. P., B. Clarke, and P. Herbison. Bladder neck mobility and urethral closure pressure as predictors of genuine stress incontinence. Int. Urogynecol. J. 13(5):289–293, 2002.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s001920200063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dietz, H. P., A. Kirby, K. L. Shek, and P. J. Bedwell. Does avulsion of the puborectalis muscle affect bladder function? Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 20(8):967–972, 2009.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-009-0882-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dietz, H. P., and K. L. Shek. The quantification of levator muscle resting tone by digital assessment. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 19(11):1489–1493, 2008.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-008-0682-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dietz, H. P., and C. Shek. Levator avulsion and grading of pelvic floor muscle strength. Int. Urogynecol. J. 19(5):633–636, 2008.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-007-0491-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dietz, H. P., and A. B. Steensma. The prevalence of major abnormalities of the levator ani in urogynaecological patients. BJOG An Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 113(2):225–230, 2006.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00819.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Digesu, G. A., D. Robinson, L. Cardozo, and V. Khullar. Three-dimensional ultrasound of the urethral sphincter predicts continence surgery outcome. Neurourol. Urodyn. 28(1):90–94, 2009.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20566.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dumoulin, C., D. Bourbonnais, M. Morin, D. Gravel, and M. C. Lemieux. Predictors of success for physiotherapy treatment in women with persistent postpartum stress urinary incontinence. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 91(7):1059–1063, 2010.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2010.03.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoyte, L., L. Schierlitz, K. Zou, G. Flesh, and J. R. Fielding. Two- and 3-dimensional MRI comparison of levator ani structure, volume, and integrity in women with stress incontinence and prolapse. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 185(1):11–19, 2001.  https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.116365.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huang, W. C., S. H. Yang, and J. M. Yang. Anatomical and functional significance of urogenital hiatus in primary urodynamic stress incontinence. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 27(1):71–77, 2006.  https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.2649.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Laycock, J., and D. Jerwood. Pelvic floor muscle assessment: The PERFECT Scheme. Physiotherapy. 87(12):631–642, 2001.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9406(05)61108-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lovegrove Jones, R. C., Q. Peng, M. Stokes, V. F. Humphrey, C. Payne, and C. E. Constantinou. Mechanisms of pelvic floor muscle function and the effect on the urethra during a cough. Eur. Urol. 57(6):1101–1110, 2010.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.06.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Madill, S. J., and L. McLean. Relationship between abdominal and pelvic floor muscle activation and intravaginal pressure during pelvic floor muscle contractions in healthy continent women. Neurourol. Urodyn. 25(7):722–730, 2006.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.20285.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Madill, S. J., S. Pontbriand-Drolet, A. Tang, and C. Dumoulin. Changes in urethral sphincter size following rehabilitation in older women with stress urinary incontinence. Int. Urogynecol. J. 26(2):277–283, 2015.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2507-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McLean, L., S. Thibault-Gagnon, K. Brooks, C. Goldfinger, C. Pukall, and S. Chamberlain. Differences in pelvic morphology between women with and without provoked vestibulodynia. J. Sex. Med. 13(6):963–971, 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.04.066.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McLean, L., K. Varette, E. Gentilcore-Saulnier, M.-A. Harvey, K. Baker, and E. Sauerbrei. Pelvic floor muscle training in women with stress urinary incontinence causes hypertrophy of the urethral sphincters and reduces bladder neck mobility during coughing. Neurourol. Urodyn. 32(8):1096–1102, 2013.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.22343.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Morgan, D. M., W. Umek, K. E. Guire, H. K. Morgan, A. Garabrant, and J. O. L. DeLancey. Urethral sphincter morphology and function with and without stress incontinence. J. Urol. 182(1):203–209, 2009.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.129.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Peng, Q., R. C. Jones, and C. E. Constantinou. 2D ultrasound image processing in identifying responses of urogenital structures to pelvic floor muscle activity. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 34(3):477–493, 2006.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-005-9059-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peng, Q., R. C. Jones, K. Shishido, and C. E. Constantinou. Ultrasound evaluation of dynamic responses of female pelvic floor muscles. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 33(3):342–352, 2007.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2006.08.020.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Persu, C., C. R. Chapple, V. Cauni, S. Gutue, and P. Geavlete. Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POP-Q)—a new era in pelvic prolapse staging. J. Med. Life. 4(1):75–81, 2011.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Peschers, U. M., D. B. Voduek, G. Fanger, G. N. Schaer, J. O. L. Delancey, and B. Schuessler. Pelvic muscle activity in nulliparous volunteers. Neurourol. Urodyn. 20(3):269–275, 2001.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nau.1004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pirpiris, A., K. L. Shek, and H. P. Dietz. Urethral mobility and urinary incontinence. Ultrasound Obs. Gynecol. 36:507–511, 2010.  https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.7658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pregazzi, R., A. Sartore, P. Bortoli, E. Grimaldi, L. Troiano, and S. Guaschino. Perineal ultrasound evaluation of urethral angle and bladder neck mobility in women with stress urinary incontinence. BJOG An. Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 109(7):821–827, 2002.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01163.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Reddy, A. P., J. O. L. DeLancey, L. M. Zwica, and J. A. Ashton-Miller. On-screen vector-based ultrasound assessment of vesical neck movement. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 185(1):65–70, 2001.  https://doi.org/10.1067/mob.2001.116373.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shek, K. L., and H. P. Dietz. The urethral motion profile: a novel method to evaluate urethral support and mobility. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 48(3):337–342, 2008.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2008.00877.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stafford, R. E., G. Coughlin, N. J. Lutton, and P. W. Hodges. Validity of estimation of pelvic floor muscle activity from transperineal ultrasound imaging in men. PLoS ONE. 10(12):e0144342, 2015.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0144342.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Thibault-Gagnon, S., C. Auchincloss, R. Graham, and L. McLean. The temporal relationship between activity of the pelvic floor muscles and motion of selected urogenital landmarks in healthy nulliparous women. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 2017(38):126–135, 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelekin.2017.11.012.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Truijen, G., J. J. Wyndaele, and J. Weyler. Original article conservative treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: who will benefit? Int. Urogynecol. J. 12(6):386–390, 2001.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s001920170018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Winter, D. A. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement (3rd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley, 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Biomedical Engineering Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  3. 3.School of Human KineticsUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  4. 4.School of Rehabilitation SciencesUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations