# On the Compressibility of Arterial Tissue

- 680 Downloads
- 16 Citations

## Abstract

Arterial tissue is commonly assumed to be incompressible. While this assumption is convenient for both experimentalists and theorists, the compressibility of arterial tissue has not been rigorously investigated. In the current study we present an experimental-computational methodology to determine the compressibility of aortic tissue and we demonstrate that specimens excised from an ovine descending aorta are significantly compressible. Specimens are stretched in the radial direction in order to fully characterise the mechanical behaviour of the tissue ground matrix. Additionally biaxial testing is performed to fully characterise the anisotropic contribution of reinforcing fibres. Due to the complexity of the experimental tests, which entail non-uniform finite deformation of a non-linear anisotropic material, it is necessary to implement an inverse finite element analysis scheme to characterise the mechanical behaviour of the arterial tissue. Results reveal that ovine aortic tissue is highly compressible; an effective Poisson’s ratio of 0.44 is determined for the ground matrix component of the tissue. It is also demonstrated that correct characterisation of material compressibility has important implications for the calibration of anisotropic fibre properties using biaxial tests. Finally it is demonstrated that correct treatment of material compressibility has significant implications for the accurate prediction of the stress state in an artery under *in vivo* type loading.

## Keywords

Compressibility Anisotropy Hyperelasticity Arterial tissue Mechanical properties## Notes

### Acknowledgments

The authors wish to acknowledge funding from Science Foundation Ireland under project SFI-12/IP/1723. Furthermore we acknowledge funding from the Irish Research Council and the College of Engineering and Informatics at NUI, Galway. The authors wish to thank Noel Reynods and Prof. Michel Destrade for insightful discussions on this topic.

## References

- 1.Anderson, T. L. Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications. Boca Raton: CRC press, 2005.Google Scholar
- 2.Boutouyrie, P., D. P. Germain, A.-I. Tropeano, B. Laloux, F. Carenzi, M. Zidi, X. Jeunemaitre, and S. Laurent. Compressibility of the carotid artery in patients with pseudoxanthoma elasticum.
*Hypertension*. 38:1181–1184, 2001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar - 3.Canham, P. B., H. M. Finlay, J. G. Dixon, D. R. Boughner, and A. Chen. Measurements from light and polarised light microscopy of human coronary arteries fixed at distending pressure.
*Cardiovasc. Res.*23:973–982, 1989.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar - 4.Carew, T. E., R. N. Vaishnav, and D. J. Patel. Compressibility of the arterial wall.
*Circ. Res.*23:61–68, 1968.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar - 5.Chuong, C., and Y. Fung. Three-dimensional stress distribution in arteries.
*J. Biomech. Eng.*105:268–274, 1983.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar - 6.Chuong, C., and Y. Fung. Compressibility and constitutive equation of arterial wall in radial compression experiments.
*J. Biomech.*17:35–40, 1984.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar - 7.Conway, C., F. Sharif, J. McGarry, and P. McHugh. A computational test-bed to assess coronary stent implantation mechanics using a population-specific approach.
*Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol.*3:374–387, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 8.Di Puccio, F., S. Celi, and P. Forte. Review of experimental investigations on compressibility of arteries and introduction of a new apparatus.
*Exp. Mech.*52:895–902, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 9.Dobrin, P., and A. Rovick. Static elastic properties of dog carotid arterial wall.
*Fed. Proc.*26:439, 1967.Google Scholar - 10.Dobrin, P. B. Biaxial anisotropy of dog carotid artery: estimation of circumferential elastic modulus.
*J. Biomech.*19:351–358, 1986.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar - 11.Elliott, D. M., and L. A. Setton. Anisotropic and inhomogeneous tensile behavior of the human anulus fibrosus: experimental measurement and material model predictions.
*J. Biomech. Eng.*123:256–263, 2001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar - 12.Finlay, H., L. McCullough, and P. Canham. Three-dimensional collagen organization of human brain arteries at different transmural pressures.
*J. Vasc. Res.*32:301–312, 1995.PubMedGoogle Scholar - 13.Finlay, H. M., P. Whittaker, and P. B. Canham. Collagen organization in the branching region of human brain arteries.
*Stroke*29: 1595–1601, 1998.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar - 14.Gasser, T. C., R. W. Ogden, and G. A. Holzapfel. Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations.
*J. R. Soc. Interface*3:15–35, 2006.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar - 15.Ghriallais, R. N., and M. Bruzzi. Effects of knee flexion on the femoropopliteal artery: a computational study.
*Med. Eng. Phys.*35: 1620–1628, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 16.Hayashi, K., H. Handa, S. Nagasawa, A. Okumura, and K. Moritake. Stiffness and elastic behavior of human intracranial and extracranial arteries,
*J. Biomech.*13:175–184, 1980.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar - 17.Holzapfel, G. A. Nonlinear solid mechanics: a continuum approach for engineers. Wiley: Chichester, 2000.Google Scholar
- 18.Holzapfel, G. A., and R. W. Ogden. On planar biaxial tests for anisotropic nonlinearly elastic solids. A continuum mechanical framework.
*Math. Mech. Solids*14:474–489, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 19.Holzapfel, G. A., T. C. Gasser, and R. W. Ogden. A new constitutive framework for arterial wall mechanics and a comparative study of material models.
*J. Elast. Phys. Sci. Solids*61:1–48, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 20.Huang, C.-Y., A. Stankiewicz, G. A. Ateshian, and V. C. Mow. Anisotropy, inhomogeneity, and tension–compression nonlinearity of human glenohumeral cartilage in finite deformation.
*J. Biomech.*38:799–809, 2005.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar - 21.Humphrey, J., D. Vawter, and R. Vito. Pseudoelasticity of excised visceral pleura.
*J. Biomech. Eng.*109:115–120, 1987.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar - 22.Humphrey, J. D. Cardiovascular solid mechanics: cells, tissues, and organs. Springer: New York, 2002.Google Scholar
- 23.Lagarias, J., J. Reeds, M. Wright, and P. Wright. Convergence properties of the nelder–mead simplex method in low dimensions.
*SIAM J. Optim.*9:112–147, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 24.Lawton, R. W. The thermoelastic behavior of isolated aortic strips of the dog.
*Circ. Res.*2:344–353, 1954.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar - 25.Misra, J., and S. Chakravarty. Study of compressibility in vascular rheology.
*Rheol. Acta*19:381–388, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 26.Nelder, J. A., and R. Mead. A simplex method for function minimization.
*Comput. J.*7:308–313, 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 27.Nolan, D., and J. McGarry. On the correct interpretation of measured force and calculation of material stress in biaxial tests.
*J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.*2015. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.08.019.PubMedGoogle Scholar - 28.Nolan, D., A. Gower, M. Destrade, R. Ogden, and J. McGarry. A robust anisotropic hyperelastic formulation for the modelling of soft tissue.
*J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.*39:48–60, 2014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar - 29.Peña, E., A. P. Del Palomar, B. Calvo, M. Martínez, and M. Doblaré. Computational modelling of diarthrodial joints. physiological, pathological and pos-surgery simulations.
*Arch. Comput. Methods Eng.*14:47–91, 2007.Google Scholar - 30.Raghavan, M., and D. A. Vorp. Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability.
*J. Biomech.*33:475–482, 2000.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar - 31.Raghavan, M., S. Trivedi, A. Nagaraj, D. McPherson, and K. Chandran. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of residual stress in arteries.
*Ann. Biomed. Eng.*, 32, 257–263, 2004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar - 32.Sacks, M. S. Biaxial mechanical evaluation of planar biological materials.
*J. Elast. Phys. Sci. Solids*61:199–246, 2000.Google Scholar - 33.Schneider, C. A., W. S. Rasband, and K. W. Eliceiri. NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis.
*Nat. Methods*9:671–675, 2012.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar - 34.Silver, F., D. Christiansen, and C. Buntin. Mechanical properties of the aorta: a review.
*Crit. Rev. Biomed. Eng.*17:323–358, 1988.Google Scholar - 35.Silver, F. H., P. B. Snowhill, and D. J. Foran. Mechanical behavior of vessel wall: a comparative study of aorta, vena cava, and carotid artery.
*Ann. Biomed. Eng.*31:793–803, 2003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar - 36.Smith, H. E., T. J. Mosher, B. J. Dardzinski, B. G. Collins, C. M. Collins, Q. X. Yang, V. J. Schmithorst, and M. B. Smith. Spatial variation in cartilage t2 of the knee.
*J. Magn. Reson. Imaging*14:50–55, 2001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar - 37.Sokolis, D. P., E. M. Kefaloyannis, M. Kouloukoussa, E. Marinos, H. Boudoulas, and P. E. Karayannacos. A structural basis for the aortic stress–strain relation in uniaxial tension.
*J. Biomech.*39:1651–1662, 2006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar - 38.Storåkers, B. On material representation and constitutive branching in finite compressible elasticity.
*J. Mech. Phys. Solids*34:125–145, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 39.Sun, W., and M. S. Sacks. Finite element implementation of a generalized fung-elastic constitutive model for planar soft tissues.
*Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol.*4:190–199, 2005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar - 40.Takamizawa, K., and K. Hayashi. Strain energy density function and uniform strain hypothesis for arterial mechanics.
*J. Biomech.*20:7–17, 1987.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar - 41.Tickner, E. G., and A. H. Sacks. A theory for the static elastic behavior of blood vessels.
*Biorheology*4:151, 1967.PubMedGoogle Scholar - 42.Vaishnav, R. N., and J. Vossoughi. Residual stress and strain in aortic segments.
*J. Biomech.*20:235–239, 1987.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar - 43.Vilarta, R., and B. D. C. Vidal. Anisotropic and biomechanical properties of tendons modified by exercise and denervation: aggregation and macromolecular order in collagen bundles.
*Matrix*9:55–61, 1989.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar - 44.Volokh, K. Compressibility of arterial wall in ring-cutting experiments.
*Mol. Cell. Biomech.*3:35, 2006.PubMedGoogle Scholar - 45.Vorp, D. A., M. Raghavan, and M. W. Webster. Mechanical wall stress in abdominal aortic aneurysm: influence of diameter and asymmetry.
*J. Vasc. Surg.*27:632–639, 1998.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar - 46.Yosibash, Z., I. Manor, I. Gilad, and U. Willentz. Experimental evidence of the compressibility of arteries.
*J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.*39:339–354, 2014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar