Laboratory Evaluation of the gForce Tracker™, a Head Impact Kinematic Measuring Device for Use in Football Helmets
- 854 Downloads
This study sought to compare a new head impact-monitoring device, which is not limited to specific helmet styles, against reference accelerometer measurements. Laboratory controlled impacts were delivered using a linear pneumatic impactor to a Hybrid III headform (HIII) fitted with a football helmet and the impact monitoring device (gForce Tracker-GFT) affixed to the inside of the helmet. Linear regression analyses and absolute mean percent error (MAPE) were used to compare the head impact kinematics measured by the GFT to a reference accelerometer located at the HIII’s center of mass. The coefficients of determination were strong for the peak linear acceleration, peak rotational velocity, and HIC15 across all impact testing locations (r 2 = 0.82, 0.94, and 0.70, respectively), but there were large MAPE for the peak linear acceleration and HIC15 (MAPE = 49 ± 21% and 108 ± 58%). The raw GFT was accurate at measuring the peak rotational velocity at the center of mass of the HIII (MAPE = 9%). Results from the impact testing were used to develop a correction algorithm. The coefficients of determination for all impact parameters improved using the correction algorithm for the GFT (r 2 > 0.97), and the MAPE were less than 14%. The GFT appears to be a suitable impact-monitoring device that is not limited to specific styles of football helmets, however, correction algorithms will need to be developed for each helmet style.
KeywordsConcussion mTBI Head acceleration Head impact biomechanics Impact monitoring Helmet sensors
The authors would like to thank Artaflex Inc. for providing the gForce Tracker equipment used in this study. The authors would also like to thank the efforts of Chris Withnall and Michael Wonnacott at Biokinetics & Associates, Ltd., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, for their assistance and expertise during data collection. A NSERC Engage Grant supported this study. None of the authors have any financial interest in any of the systems used in this study.
- 1.Allison M. A., Y. S. Kang, M. R. Maltese, J. H. T. Bolte, and K. B. Arbogast. Measurement of hybrid III head impact kinematics using an accelerometer and gyroscope system in ice hockey helmets. Ann. Biomed. Eng., 2014.Google Scholar
- 5.Cichos D., D. de Vogel, M. Otto, O. Schaar, and S. Zölsch. Crash analysis criteria description. In: Workgroup Data Processing Vehicle Safety, 2006.Google Scholar
- 6.Cobb B. R., A. MacAlister, T. J. Young, A. R. Kemper, S. Rowson, and S. M. Duma. Quantitative comparison of hybrid III and National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment headform shape characteristics and implications on football helmet fit. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part P 1754337114548245, 2014.Google Scholar
- 7.DiMasi F. Transformation of nine-accelerometer-package (nap) data for replicating headpart kinematics and dynamic loading. Technical Report, 1995.Google Scholar
- 15.McAllister, T. W., J. C. Ford, L. A. Flashman, A. Maerlender, R. M. Greenwald, J. G. Beckwith, R. P. Bolander, T. D. Tosteson, J. H. Turco, R. Raman, and S. Jain. Effect of head impacts on diffusivity measures in a cohort of collegiate contact sport athletes. Neurology 82:63–69, 2014.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 18.National Committee on Standards for Athletic E. Nocsae standard linear impactor test method and equipment used in evaluating the performance characteristics of protective headgear and faceguards. Document #: 1–6, 2006.Google Scholar
- 20.Pellman E. J., D. C. Viano, A. M. Tucker, I. R. Casson, and N. F. L. Committee on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Concussion in professional football: location and direction of helmet impacts-Part 2. Neurosurgery 53: 1328–1340; discussion 1340–1321, 2003.Google Scholar
- 23.Rowson, S., S. M. Duma, R. M. Greenwald, J. G. Beckwith, J. J. Chu, K. M. Guskiewicz, J. P. Mihalik, J. J. Crisco, B. J. Wilcox, T. W. McAllister, A. C. Maerlender, S. P. Broglio, B. Schnebel, S. Anderson, and P. G. Brolinson. Can helmet design reduce the risk of concussion in football? J. Neurosurg. 120:919–922, 2014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 26.Takhounts, E. G., S. A. Ridella, V. Hasija, R. E. Tannous, J. Q. Campbell, D. Malone, K. Danelson, J. Stitzel, S. Rowson, and S. Duma. Investigation of traumatic brain injuries using the next generation of simulated injury monitor (SIMon) finite element head model. Stapp Car Crash J. 52(52):1–31, 2008.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Versace, J. A Review of the Severity Index. Warrendale: SAE, pp. 771–796, 1971.Google Scholar
- 30.Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE). Instrumentation for Impact Test Part 1: Electronic Instrumentation, SAE J211/1. SAE, 2007.Google Scholar