Design Optimisation of Coronary Artery Stent Systems
- 653 Downloads
In recent years, advances in computing power and computational methods have made it possible to perform detailed simulations of the coronary artery stenting procedure and of related virtual tests of performance (including fatigue resistance, corrosion and haemodynamic disturbance). Simultaneously, there has been a growth in systematic computational optimisation studies, largely exploiting the suitability of surrogate modelling methods to time-consuming simulations. To date, systematic optimisation has focussed on stent shape optimisation and has re-affirmed the complexity of the multi-disciplinary, multi-objective problem at hand. Also, surrogate modelling has predominantly involved the method of Kriging. Interestingly, though, optimisation tools, particularly those associated with Kriging, haven’t been used as efficiently as they could have been. This has especially been the case with the way that Kriging predictor functions have been updated during the search for optimal designs. Nonetheless, the potential for future, carefully posed, optimisation strategies has been suitably demonstrated, as described in this review.
Key termsComputational Modelling Kriging Multi-objective optimization
The authors would like to thank Medtronic Inc. (Minnesota, USA) for their unrestricted support.
- 5.Blouza, A., L. Dumas and I. M’Baye. Multiobjective optimization of a stent in a fluid-structure context. Proceedings of the 2008 GECCO Conference Companion on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 2055–2060, 2008.Google Scholar
- 7.Bozsak, F., D. Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Z. Sternberger, P. Belitz, T. Bewley, J-M. Chomaz, and A. I. Barakat. Optimization of drug delivery by drug-eluting stents. PLoS One 10(6):e0130182, 2015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130182.
- 8.Caixeta, A., P. Genereux, G. Dangas, and R. Mehran. In-stent restenosis in the drug-eluting stent era. In: Chapter 28 in Oxford Textbook of Interventional Cardiology, edited by S. Redwood, N. Curzen, and M. Thomas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
- 13.Deb, K., M. Mohan and S. Mishra. A fast multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for finding well-spread pareto-optimal solutions. KanGAL Report Number 2003002, 2003.Google Scholar
- 16.FDA. Non-clinical engineering tests and recommended labeling for intravascular stents and associated delivery systems. http://www.fda.gov/medicaldevices/deviceregulationandguidance/guidancedocuments/ucm071863.htm. 2010. Accessed 1st April 2015.
- 20.Gundert, T. J., A. L. Marsden, W. Yang, and J. F. LaDisa, Jr. Optimization of cardiovascular stent design using computational fluid dynamics. J. Biomech. Eng. 134:011002-1–011002-8, 2012.Google Scholar
- 21.Harewood, F., R. Thornton and P. Sharp. Step change in design: exploring sixty stent design variations overnight. www.altairproductdesign.com, 2011.
- 22.Harold, J. G., T. A. Bass, T. M. Bashore, et al. ACCF/AHA/SCAI, Update of the clinical competence statement on coronary artery interventional procedures. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 128:436–472, 2013.Google Scholar
- 26.Krige, D. G. A statistical approach to some basic mine valuation problems on the Wit-watersrand. J. Chem. Metall. Miner. Soc. SA 52(6):119–139, 1951.Google Scholar
- 27.Levine, G. N., E. R. Bates, J. C. Blankenship, et al. ACCF/AHA/SCAI guideline for percutaneous coronary intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 58:e44–e122, 2011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Li, H., T. Qiu, B. Zhu, J. Wu, and X. Wang. Design optimization of coronary stent based on finite element models. Sci. World J. 2013:630243, 2013.Google Scholar
- 30.Lophaven, S., H. Nielsen and J. Søndergaard. DACE—A MATLAB Kriging Toolbox Version 2.0, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Technical Report IMM-TR-2002-12, 2002.Google Scholar
- 33.Morice, M.-C., P. Serruys, J. Sousa, J. Fajadet, E. Ban Hayashi, M. Perin, A. Colombo, G. Schuler, P. Barragan, G. Guagliumi, et al. The RAVEL Study Group. A randomized comparison of a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization. N. Engl. J. Med. 346:1773–1780, 2002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.Moses, J., M. Leon, J. Popma, P. Fitzgerald, D. Holmes, C. O’Shaughnessy, R. Caputo, D. Kereiakes, D. Williams, P. Teirstein, et al. The SIRIUS Investigators. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery. N. Engl. J. Med. 349:1315–1323, 2003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar