Evaluation of Cartilage Repair by Mesenchymal Stem Cells Seeded on a PEOT/PBT Scaffold in an Osteochondral Defect
The main objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-seeded polyethylene-oxide-terephthalate/polybutylene-terephthalate (PEOT/PBT) scaffold for cartilage tissue repair in an osteochondral defect using a rabbit model. Material characterisation using scanning electron microscopy indicated that the scaffold had a 3D architecture characteristic of the additive manufacturing fabrication method, with a strut diameter of 296 ± 52 μm and a pore size of 512 ± 22 μm × 476 ± 25 μm × 180 ± 30 μm. In vitro optimisation revealed that the scaffold did not generate an adverse cell response, optimal cell loading conditions were achieved using 50 μg/ml fibronectin and a cell seeding density of 25 × 106 cells/ml and glycosaminoglycan (GAG) accumulation after 28 days culture in the presence of TGFβ3 indicated positive chondrogenesis. Cell-seeded scaffolds were implanted in osteochondral defects for 12 weeks, with cell-free scaffolds and empty defects employed as controls. On examination of toluidine blue staining for chondrogenesis and GAG accumulation, both the empty defect and the cell-seeded scaffold appeared to promote repair. However, the empty defect and the cell-free scaffold stained positive for collagen type I or fibrocartilage, while the cell-seeded scaffold stained positive for collagen type II indicative of hyaline cartilage and was statistically better than the cell-free scaffold in the blinded histological evaluation. In summary, MSCs in combination with a 3D PEOT/PBT scaffold created a reparative environment for cartilage repair.
KeywordsAdditive manufacturing 3D scaffold PEOT/PBT Mesenchymal stem cells Cartilage repair
This work was supported by Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) Strategic Research Cluster (SRC), Grant No. SFI: 09/SRC B1794, Wellcome Trust Biomedical Vacation Scholarships Grant Number WTD004448, the European Union’s 7th Framework Programme under Grant Agreement No. HEALTH-2007-B-223298 (PurStem).
- 3.Christensen, B. B., C. B. Foldager, O. M. Hansen, A. A. Kristiansen, D. Q. S. Le, A. D. Nielsen, J. V. Nygaard, C. E. Bünger, and M. Lind. A novel nano-structured porous polycaprolactone scaffold improves hyaline cartilage repair in a rabbit model compared to a collagen type I/III scaffold: in vitro and in vivo studies. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. Off. J. ESSKA 20:1192–1204, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Emans, P. J., E. J. P. Jansen, D. van Iersel, T. J. M. Welting, T. B. F. Woodfield, S. K. Bulstra, J. Riesle, L. W. van Rhijn, and R. Kuijer. Tissue-engineered constructs: the effect of scaffold architecture in osteochondral repair. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med., 2012. doi: 10.1002/term.1477.
- 6.Hoemann, C., R. Kandel, S. Roberts, D. B. F. Saris, L. Creemers, P. Mainil-Varlet, S. Méthot, A. P. Hollander, and M. D. Buschmann. International cartilage repair society (ICRS) recommended guidelines for histological endpoints for cartilage repair studies in animal models and clinical trials. Cartilage 2:153–172, 2011.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Hurtig, M. B., M. D. Buschmann, L. A. Fortier, C. D. Hoemann, E. B. Hunziker, J. S. Jurvelin, P. Mainil-Varlet, C. W. McIlwraith, R. L. Sah, and R. A. Whiteside. Preclinical studies for cartilage repair recommendations from the international cartilage repair society. Cartilage 2:137–152, 2011.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Jansen, E. J. P., J. Pieper, M. J. J. Gijbels, N. A. Guldemond, J. Riesle, L. W. Van Rhijn, S. K. Bulstra, and R. Kuijer. PEOT/PBT based scaffolds with low mechanical properties improve cartilage repair tissue formation in osteochondral defects. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 89:444–452, 2009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Maehara, H., S. Sotome, T. Yoshii, I. Torigoe, Y. Kawasaki, Y. Sugata, M. Yuasa, M. Hirano, N. Mochizuki, M. Kikuchi, K. Shinomiya, and A. Okawa. Repair of large osteochondral defects in rabbits using porous hydroxyapatite/collagen (HAp/Col) and fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2). J. Orthop. Res. Off. Publ. Orthop. Res. Soc. 28:677–686, 2010.Google Scholar
- 20.Matsiko, A., T. J. Levingstone, F. J. O’Brien, and J. P. Gleeson. Addition of hyaluronic acid improves cellular infiltration and promotes early-stage chondrogenesis in a collagen-based scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 11:41–52, 2012.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Moroni, L., J. R. de Wijn, and C. A. van Blitterswijk. Three-dimensional fiber-deposited PEOT/PBT copolymer scaffolds for tissue engineering: influence of porosity, molecular network mesh size, and swelling in aqueous media on dynamic mechanical properties. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 75:957–965, 2005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Valonen, P. K., F. T. Moutos, A. Kusanagi, M. G. Moretti, B. O. Diekman, J. F. Welter, A. I. Caplan, F. Guilak, and L. E. Freed. In vitro generation of mechanically functional cartilage grafts based on adult human stem cells and 3D-woven poly(epsilon-caprolactone) scaffolds. Biomaterials 31:2193–2200, 2010.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar