Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Feasibility and Analysis of Bipolar Concentric Recording of Electrohysterogram with Flexible Active Electrode

Abstract

The conduction velocity and propagation patterns of the electrohysterogram (EHG) provide fundamental information on the electrophysiological condition of the uterus. However, the accuracy of these measurements can be impaired by both the poor spatial selectivity and sensitivity to the relative direction of the contraction propagation associated with conventional disc electrodes. Concentric ring electrodes could overcome these limitations. The aim of this study was to examine the feasibility of picking up surface EHG signals using a new flexible tripolar concentric ring electrode (TCRE), and to compare these signals with conventional bipolar recordings. Simultaneous recording of conventional bipolar signals and bipolar concentric EHG (BC-EHG) were carried out on 22 pregnant women. Signal bursts were characterized and compared. No significant differences were found between the channels in either duration or dominant frequency in the Fast Wave High frequency range. Nonetheless, the high pass filtering effect of the BC-EHG recordings gave lower frequency content between 0.1 and 0.2 Hz. Although the BC-EHG signal amplitude was about 5–7 times smaller than that of bipolar recordings, a similar signal-to-noise ratio was obtained. These results suggest that the flexible TCRE is able to pick up uterine electrical activity and could provide additional information for deducing the uterine electrophysiological condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

References

  1. 1.

    Alberola-Rubio, J., G. Prats-Boluda, Y. Ye-Lin, J. Valero, A. Perales, and J. Garcia-Casado. Comparison of non-invasive electrohysterographic recording techniques for monitoring uterine dynamics. Med. Eng. Phys. 35(12):1736–1743, 2013.

  2. 2.

    Besio, W. G., K. Koka, R. Aakula, and W. Dai. Tri-polar concentric ring electrode development for laplacian electroencephalography. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 53(5):926–933, 2006.

  3. 3.

    Devasahayam, S. R. Signals and Systems in Biomedical Engineering. Berlin: Springer, 2013.

  4. 4.

    Devedeux, D., C. Marque, S. Mansour, G. Germain, and J. Duchene. Uterine electromyography: a critical review. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 169(6):1636–1653, 1993.

  5. 5.

    Estrada, L., A. Torres, J. Garcia-Casado, G. Prats-Boluda, and R. Jane. Characterization of laplacian surface electromyographic signals during isometric contraction in biceps brachii. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng Med. Biol. Soc. 2013:535–538, 2013.

  6. 6.

    Euliano, T. Y., D. Marossero, M. T. Nguyen, N. R. Euliano, J. Principe, and R. K. Edwards. Spatiotemporal electrohysterography patterns in normal and arrested labor. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 200(1):54–57, 2009.

  7. 7.

    Farina, D., and C. Cescon. Concentric-ring electrode systems for noninvasive detection of single motor unit activity. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 48(11):1326–1334, 2001.

  8. 8.

    Fele-Zorz, G., G. Kavsek, Z. Novak-Antolic, and F. Jager. A comparison of various linear and non-linear signal processing techniques to separate uterine EMG records of term and pre-term delivery groups. Med. Biol. Eng Comput. 46(9):911–922, 2008.

  9. 9.

    Garfield, R. E., and W. L. Maner. Physiology and electrical activity of uterine contractions. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 18(3):289–295, 2007.

  10. 10.

    Garfield, R. E., W. L. Maner, L. B. Mackay, D. Schlembach, and G. R. Saade. Comparing uterine electromyography activity of antepartum patients vs. term labor patients. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 193(1):23–29, 2005.

  11. 11.

    Garfield, R. E., H. Maul, L. Shi, W. Maner, C. Fittkow, G. Olsen, and G. R. Saade. Methods and devices for the management of term and preterm labor. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 943(1):203–224, 2001.

  12. 12.

    Hassan, M., J. Terrien, C. Muszynski, A. Alexandersson, C. Marque, and B. Karlsson. Better pregnancy monitoring using nonlinear correlation analysis of external uterine electromyography. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 60(4):1160–1166, 2013.

  13. 13.

    Kaufer, M., L. Rasquinha, and P. Tarjan. Optimization of multi-ring sensing electrode set, Conference proceedings of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 1990, pp. 612–613.

  14. 14.

    Koka, K., and W. G. Besio. Improvement of spatial selectivity and decrease of mutual information of tri-polar concentric ring electrodes. J. Neurosci. Methods 165(2):216–222, 2007.

  15. 15.

    Lu, C.-C., and P. P. Tarjan. Pasteless, active, concentric ring sensors for directly obtained laplacian cardiac electrograms. J. Med. Biol. Eng. 22(4):199–203, 2002.

  16. 16.

    Lucovnik, M., W. L. Maner, L. R. Chambliss, R. Blumrick, J. Balducci, Z. Novak-Antolic, and R. E. Garfield. Noninvasive uterine electromyography for prediction of preterm delivery. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 204(3):228.e1–228.e10, 2011.

  17. 17.

    Maner, W. L., and R. E. Garfield. Identification of human term and preterm labor using artificial neural networks on uterine electromyography data. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 35(3):465–473, 2007.

  18. 18.

    Maner, W. L., R. E. Garfield, H. Maul, G. Olson, and G. Saade. Predicting term and preterm delivery with transabdominal uterine electromyography. Obstet. Gynecol. 101(6):1254–1260, 2003.

  19. 19.

    Marque, C., J. M. Duchene, S. Leclercq, G. S. Panczer, and J. Chaumont. Uterine EHG processing for obstetrical monitoring. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 33(12):1182–1187, 1986.

  20. 20.

    Marque, C. K., J. Terrien, S. Rihana, and G. Germain. Preterm labour detection by use of a biophysical marker: the uterine electrical activity. BMC. Pregnancy Childbirth. 7(Suppl1):S5, 2007.

  21. 21.

    Maul, H., W. L. Maner, G. Olson, G. R. Saade, and R. E. Garfield. Non-invasive transabdominal uterine electromyography correlates with the strength of intrauterine pressure and is predictive of labor and delivery. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 15(5):297–301, 2004.

  22. 22.

    Miles, A. M., M. Monga, and K. S. Richeson. Correlation of external and internal monitoring of uterine activity in a cohort of term patients. Am. J. Perinatol. 18(3):137–140, 2001.

  23. 23.

    Prats-Boluda, G., J. Garcia-Casado, J. L. Martinez-de-Juan, and Y. Ye-Lin. Active concentric ring electrode for non-invasive detection of intestinal myoelectric signals. Med. Eng. Phys. 33(4):446–455, 2010.

  24. 24.

    Prats-Boluda, G., Y. Ye-Lin, E. Garcia-Breijo, J. Ibañez, and J. Garcia-Casado. Active flexible concentric ring electrode for non-invasive surface bioelectrical recordings. Meas. Sci. Technol. 23(12):1–10, 2012.

  25. 25.

    Rabotti, C., M. Mischi, S. G. Oei, and J. W. Bergmans. Noninvasive estimation of the electrohysterographic action-potential conduction velocity. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 57(9):2178–2187, 2010.

  26. 26.

    Rabotti, C., S. G. Oei, H. J. van ‘t, and M. Mischi. Electrohysterographic propagation velocity for preterm delivery prediction. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 205(6):e9–e10, 2011.

  27. 27.

    Rooijakkers, M. J., S. Song, C. Rabotti, S. G. Oei, J. W. Bergmans, E. Cantatore, and M. Mischi. Influence of electrode placement on signal quality for ambulatory pregnancy monitoring. Comput. Math. Methods Med. 2014(1):960980, 2014.

  28. 28.

    Schlembach, D., W. L. Maner, R. E. Garfield, and H. Maul. Monitoring the progress of pregnancy and labor using electromyography. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 144(Suppl1):S33–S39, 2009.

  29. 29.

    Sikora, J., A. Matonia, R. Czabanski, K. Horoba, J. Jezewski, and T. Kupka. Recognition of premature threatening labour symptoms from bioelectrical uterine activity signals. Arch. Perinatal Med. 17(2):97–103, 2011.

  30. 30.

    Terrien, J., C. Marque, and B. Karlsson. Spectral characterization of human EHG frequency components based on the extraction and reconstruction of the ridges in the scalogram, Conference proceedings of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, 2007, pp. 1872–1875.

  31. 31.

    Terrien, J., C. Marque, T. Steingrimsdottir, and B. Karlsson. Evaluation of adaptive filtering methods on a 16 electrode electrohysterogram recorded externally in labor, 11th Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biomedical Engineering and Computing, 2007, Vol. 16, pp. 135–138.

  32. 32.

    U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to clinical preventive services: an assessment of the effectiveness of 169 interventions. Baltimore: Willams & Wilkins, 1989.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Obstetrics Unit of the Hospital Universitario La Fe de Valencia (Valencia, Spain), where the recording sessions were carried out. The work was supported in part by the Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología de España (TEC2010-16945), by the Universitat Politècnica de Valencia (PAID SP20120490) and Generalitat Valenciana (GV/2014/029) and by General Electric Healthcare.

Author information

Correspondence to Javier Garcia-Casado.

Additional information

Associate Editor Thurmon E. Lockhart oversaw the review of this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ye-Lin, Y., Alberola-Rubio, J., Prats-boluda, G. et al. Feasibility and Analysis of Bipolar Concentric Recording of Electrohysterogram with Flexible Active Electrode. Ann Biomed Eng 43, 968–976 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-014-1130-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Concentric ring electrode
  • Flexible electrode
  • Electrohysterogram