Porous Implants Modulate Healing and Induce Shifts in Local Macrophage Polarization in the Foreign Body Reaction
- 1.8k Downloads
The foreign body reaction (FBR) to implanted materials is of critical importance when medical devices require biological integration and vascularization to support their proper function (e.g., transcutaneous devices, implanted drug delivery systems, tissue replacements, and sensors). One class of materials that improves FBR outcomes is made by sphere-templating, resulting in porous structures with uniform, interconnected 34 μm pores. With these materials we observe reduced fibrosis and increased vascularization. We hypothesized that improved healing is a result of a shift in macrophage polarization, often measured as the ratio of M1 pro-inflammatory cells to M2 pro-healing cells. In this study, macrophage polarity of 34 μm porous implants was compared to non-porous and 160 μm porous implants in subcutaneous mouse tissue. Immunohistochemistry revealed that macrophages in implant pores displayed a shift towards an M1 phenotype compared to externalized cells. Macrophages in 34 μm porous implants had up to 63% greater expression of M1 markers and up to 85% reduction in M2 marker expression (p < 0.05). Macrophages immediately outside the porous structure, in contrast, showed a significant enrichment in M2 phenotypic cells. This study supports a role for macrophage polarization in driving the FBR to implanted materials.
KeywordsM1 M2 Vascularization Foreign body capsule Sphere-templated porous scaffolds
These studies were funded by University of Washington Engineered Biomaterials (UWEB21). Materials support was from RTM who is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.
- 12.Dunne, A., and L. A. J. O’Neill. The interleukin-1 receptor/toll-like receptor superfamily: signal transduction during inflammation and host defense. Sci. STKE 2003:re3, 2003.Google Scholar
- 16.Jones, J. A., D. T. Chang, H. Meyerson, E. Colton, I. K. Kwon, T. Matsuda, and J. M. Anderson. Proteomic analysis and quantification of cytokines and chemokines from biomaterial surface-adherent macrophages and foreign body giant cells. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 83:585–596, 2007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Kigerl, K. A., J. C. Gensel, D. P. Ankeny, J. K. Alexander, D. J. Donnelly, and P. G. Popovich. Identification of two distinct macrophage subsets with divergent effects causing either neurotoxicity or regeneration in the injured mouse spinal cord. J. Neurosci. 29:13435–13444, 2009.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Malik, A. F., R. Hoque, X. Ouyang, A. Ghani, E. Hong, K. Khan, L. B. Moore, G. Ng, F. Munro, R. A. Flavell, Y. Shi, T. R. Kyriakides, and W. Z. Mehal. Inflammasome components Asc and caspase-1 mediate biomaterial-induced inflammation and foreign body response. PNAS 108:20095–20100, 2011.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Rodriguez, A., H. Meyerson, and J. M. Anderson. Quantitative in vivo cytokine analysis at synthetic biomaterial implant sites. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 89A:152–159, 2009.Google Scholar