The Effect of Visual and Sensory Performance on Head Impact Biomechanics in College Football Players
- 1.6k Downloads
The development of prevention strategies is critical to address the rising prevalence of sport-related concussions. Visual and sensory performance may influence an individual’s ability to interpret environmental cues, anticipate opponents’ actions, and create appropriate motor responses limiting the severity of an impending head impact. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between traditional and visual sensory reaction time measures, and the association between visual and sensory performance and head impact severity in college football players. Thirty-eight collegiate football players participated in the study. We used real-time data collection instrumentation to record head impact biomechanics during games and practices. Our findings reveal no significant correlations between reaction time on traditional and visual sensory measures. We found a significant association between head impact severity and level of visual and sensory performance for multiple assessments, with low visual and sensory performers sustaining a higher number of severe head impacts. Our findings reveal a link between level of visual and sensory performance and head impact biomechanics. Future research will allow clinicians to have the most appropriate testing batteries to identify at-risk athletes and create interventions to decrease their risk of injurious head impacts.
KeywordsConcussion Football Injury prevention Kinematics Mild traumatic brain injury Sports biomechanics Vision
This study was supported in part by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment. None of the authors have any financial interest in any of the systems used for this study. We thank Nike for the provision of equipment used in this study.
- 1.2010–11 High School Athletics Participation Survey, 2011, The National Federation of State High School Associations. pp. 51–66.Google Scholar
- 2.Bailes, J. E., and R. C. Cantu. Head injury in athletes. Neurosurgery 48:26–45; discussion 45–46, 2001.Google Scholar
- 4.Bracken, N. NCAA® Sports Sponsorship and Participation Rates Report, 2007. Indianapolis: The National Collegiate Athletic Association.Google Scholar
- 6.Dick, R., M. S. Ferrara, J. Agel, R. Courson, S. W. Marshall, M. J. Hanley, and F. Reifsteck. Descriptive epidemiology of collegiate men’s football injuries: National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance System, 1988–1989 through 2003–2004. J. Athl. Train. 42:221–233, 2007.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 14.Holbourn, A. H. S. The mechanics of brain injuries. Br. Med. Bull. 3:147–149, 1945.Google Scholar
- 18.McCrory, P., W. Meeuwisse, K. Johnston, J. Dvorak, M. Aubry, M. Molloy, and R. Cantu. Consensus Statement on Concussion in Sport—The 3rd International Conference on Concussion in Sport Held in Zurich, November 2008. PM R, Vol. 1, pp. 406–420, 2009Google Scholar
- 21.Ocwieja, K. E., J. P. Mihalik, S. W. Marshall, J. D. Schmidt, S. C. Trulock, and K. M. Guskiewicz. The effect of play type and collision closing distance on head impact biomechanics. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2011.Google Scholar
- 28.van der Kamp, J. Exploring the merits of perceptual anticipation in the soccer penalty kick. Mot. Control 15:342–358, 2011.Google Scholar
- 32.Zimmerman, A. B., K. L. Lust, and M. A. Bullimore. Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity testing for sports vision. Eye Contact Lens, 2011.Google Scholar