BioInnovate Ireland—Fostering Entrepreneurial Activity Through Medical Device Innovation Training
- 405 Downloads
In the midst of a rich environment for medical device development and manufacturing, universities can play a critical role by developing relevant training programs to produce entrepreneurs who can be efficient and successful in creating early stage companies by understanding deeply the issues involved in creating a useful device, how to raise money, designing early clinical studies and locating manufacturing partners.
KeywordsMedical devices Innovation Educational programmes
M. S. Bruzzi is the program Director of BioInnovate Ireland. J. H. Linehan has been an advisor from the conception of the program and is currently a member of the BioInnovate Advisory Board. BioInnovate Ireland is a partnership between the National University of Ireland Galway, University of Limerick, University College Cork and Dublin City University. The program is supported by Enterprise Ireland, the Irish Medical Device Association and industry sponsors acknowledged in www.bioinnovate.ie.
- 1.Best, M. H., P. Ryan, S. Das, O. Tulum, and M. Giblin. Capabilities & competitiveness: A methodological approach for understanding Irish economic transformation. The Lucerna Project Report. 2010, Centre for Innovation and Structural Change, NUI Galway.Google Scholar
- 2.BioInnovate Ireland. www.bioinnovate.ie. Accessed 20 Nov 2012.
- 3.Bowen, H. K., and C. Purrington. Center for Integration of Medicine and Innovative Technology (CIMIT) case study. Harvard Business Review, 2007. http://www.cimit.org/. Accessed 20 Nov 2012.
- 4.Brown, T. Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review 86(84–92):141, 2008.Google Scholar
- 5.Cassak, D. Israel’s device community: opportunities and challenges ahead. Medtech Insight 11(2), 2009.Google Scholar
- 6.Cassak, D. Ireland’s Medtech Explosion. In Vivo 29(8), 2011.Google Scholar
- 7.Centre for Technology in Medicine and Health. http://www.ctmh.se/. Accessed 20 Nov 2012.
- 8.Dorf, R. C., and T. H. Byers. Technology Ventures: From Idea to Enterprise. San Francisco: McGraw Hill, 2005.Google Scholar
- 10.Future Skills Needs of the Irish Medical Devices Sector: 2007–2013, 2008.Google Scholar
- 11.Innovation Task Force Report. Dublin, Ireland, 2010.Google Scholar
- 12.Irish Medical Device Asscoiation. www.imda.ie. Accessed 20 Nov 2012.
- 13.Johns Hopkins University, Centre of Bioengineering Innovaion and Design. http://cbid.bme.jhu.edu/. Accessed 20 Nov 2012.
- 14.Kelly, T. The Art of Innovation. New York: Doubleday, 2001.Google Scholar
- 15.Pietzsch, J. B., M. E. Pate-Cornell, P. G. Yock, L. M. Aquino, and J. H. Linehan. Stage-gate process for the development of medical devices. J. Med. Devices 021004-1–021004-15, 2009.Google Scholar
- 16.Stanford Bodesign. http://biodesign.stanford.edu/bdn/index.jsp. Accessed 20 Nov 2012.
- 17.Ten Years On. Confirming impacts from research investment: a case study focusing on the direct commercial and economic impacts from exchequer investment into centres and initiatives supported by the Programme for Research in Third Level Institutions (PRTLI), 2000–2006.Google Scholar
- 18.Wallace H. Coulter Founation. http://www.whcf.org/. Accessed 20 Nov 2012
- 19.Yock, P. G., T. J. Brinton, and S. A. Zenios. Teaching biomedical technology innovation as a discipline. Sci. Transl. Med. 3(92):1–5, 2012.Google Scholar
- 20.Zenios, S., J. Makower, and P. Yock. Biodesign: The Process of Innovating Medical Technologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar