Three-dimensional Quantification of Femoral Head Shape in Controls and Patients with Cam-type Femoroacetabular Impingement
An objective measurement technique to quantify 3D femoral head shape was developed and applied to normal subjects and patients with cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). 3D reconstructions were made from high-resolution CT images of 15 cam and 15 control femurs. Femoral heads were fit to ideal geometries consisting of rotational conchoids and spheres. Geometric similarity between native femoral heads and ideal shapes was quantified. The maximum distance native femoral heads protruded above ideal shapes and the protrusion area were measured. Conchoids provided a significantly better fit to native femoral head geometry than spheres for both groups. Cam-type FAI femurs had significantly greater maximum deviations (4.99 ± 0.39 mm and 4.08 ± 0.37 mm) than controls (2.41 ± 0.31 mm and 1.75 ± 0.30 mm) when fit to spheres or conchoids, respectively. The area of native femoral heads protruding above ideal shapes was significantly larger in controls when a lower threshold of 0.1 mm (for spheres) and 0.01 mm (for conchoids) was used to define a protrusion. The 3D measurement technique described herein could supplement measurements of radiographs in the diagnosis of cam-type FAI. Deviations up to 2.5 mm from ideal shapes can be expected in normal femurs while deviations of 4–5 mm are characteristic of cam-type FAI.
KeywordsCam FAI Femur morphology Asphericity
Funding for the recruitment and CT scanning of cam-type FAI patients was received through NIH grant #R01AR053344. Procurement and CT scanning of the control femurs was done with funds from a U.S. Department of the Army Award #W81XWH-06-1-0574.
- 1.Almoussa, S., C. Barton, A. D. Speirs, W. Gofton, and P. E. Beaule. Computer-assisted correction of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement: a sawbones study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 93(Suppl 2):70–75, 2011.Google Scholar
- 12.Cerveri, P., A. Manzotti, and G. Baroni. Patient-specific acetabular shape modelling: comparison among sphere, ellipsoid and conchoid parameterisations. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2012. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2012.702765
- 14.Clohisy, J. C., J. C. Carlisle, P. E. Beaule, Y. J. Kim, R. T. Trousdale, R. J. Sierra, M. Leunig, P. L. Schoenecker, and M. B. Millis. A systematic approach to the plain radiographic evaluation of the young adult hip. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 90(Suppl 4):47–66, 2008.Google Scholar
- 15.Clohisy, J. C., L. P. Zebala, J. J. Nepple, and G. Pashos. Combined hip arthroscopy and limited open osteochondroplasty for anterior femoroacetabular impingement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 92:1697–1706, 2010.Google Scholar
- 19.Eijer, H., M. Leunig, N. Mahomed, and R. Ganz. Cross table lateral radiographs for screening of anterior femoral head-neck offset in patients with femoro-acetabular impingement. Hip Int. 11:37–41, 2001.Google Scholar
- 23.Ito, K., M. A. Minka, 2nd, M. Leunig, S. Werlen, and R. Ganz. Femoroacetabular impingement and the cam-effect. A MRI-based quantitative anatomical study of the femoral head-neck offset. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 83:171–176, 2001.Google Scholar
- 24.Kapron, A. L., A. E. Anderson, S. K. Aoki, L. G. Phillips, D. J. Petron, R. Toth, and C. L. Peters. Radiographic prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement in collegiate football players: Aaos exhibit selection. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 93:e111(111-110), 2011.Google Scholar
- 27.Lavigne, M., M. Kalhor, M. Beck, R. Ganz, and M. Leunig. Distribution of vascular foramina around the femoral head and neck junction: relevance for conservative intracapsular procedures of the hip. Orthop. Clin. N. Am. 36(2):171–176, viii, 2005.Google Scholar
- 28.Mardones, R. M., C. Gonzalez, Q. Chen, M. Zobitz, K. R. Kaufman, and R. T. Trousdale. Surgical treatment of femoroacetabular impingement: evaluation of the effect of the size of the resection. Surgical technique. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 88(Suppl 1 Pt 1):84–91, 2006.Google Scholar
- 32.Metz, C. T. Digitally Reconstructed Radiographs. Utrecht: Utrecht University, p. 79, 2005.Google Scholar
- 35.Notzli, H. P., T. F. Wyss, C. H. Stoecklin, M. R. Schmid, K. Treiber, and J. Hodler. The contour of the femoral head-neck junction as a predictor for the risk of anterior impingement. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 84:556–560, 2002.Google Scholar