Accelerometry Reveals Differences in Gait Variability Between Patients with Multiple Sclerosis and Healthy Controls
Variability of movement reflects important information for the maintenance of the health of the system. For pathological populations, changes in variability during gait signal the presence of abnormal motor control strategies. For persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS), extensive gait problems have been reported including changes in gait variability. While previous studies have focused on footfall variability, the present study used accelerometers on the trunk to measure variability during walking. Thus, the purpose of this study was to examine the variability of the acceleration pattern of the upper and lower trunk in PwMS compared to healthy controls. We extracted linear and nonlinear measures of gait variability from 30 s of steady state walking for 15 PwMS and 15 age-matched healthy controls. PwMS had altered variability compared to controls with greater Lyapunov exponent in the ML (p < 0.001) and AP (p < 0.001) directions, and greater frequency dispersion in the ML direction (p = 0.034). PwMS also demonstrated greater mean velocity in the ML direction (p = 0.045) and lower root mean square of acceleration in the AP direction (p = 0.040). These findings indicate that PwMS have altered structure of variability of the trunk during gait compared to healthy controls and agree with previous findings related to changes in gait variability in PwMS.
KeywordsNonlinear Trunk Steady state Lyapunov exponent
This study was funded by the National Multiple Sclerosis Society’s Rehabilitation Research Training Grant and the Medical Research Foundation of Oregon’s Early Clinical Investigator Award.
Conflict of interest
The authors certify that no party having a direct interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit on us or on any organization with which we are associated.
- 2.Benedetti, M. G., R. Piperno, L. Simoncini, P. Bonato, A. Tonini, and S. Giannini. Gait abnormalities in minimally impaired multiple sclerosis patients. Mult. Scler. (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) 5:363, 1999.Google Scholar
- 5.Cattaneo, D., and J. Jonsdottir. Sensory impairments in quiet standing in subjects with multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) 15:59, 2009.Google Scholar
- 8.Chiari, L., L. Rocchi, and A. Cappello. Stabilometric parameters are affected by anthropometry and foot placement. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 17:666, 2002.Google Scholar
- 11.Crenshaw, S.J., T.D. Royer, J.G. Richards, and D.J. Hudson. Gait variability in people with multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) 12:613, 2006.Google Scholar
- 16.Hausdorff, J. M., P. L. Purdon, C. K. Peng, Z. Ladin, J. Y. Wei, and A. L. Goldberger. Fractal dynamics of human gait: stability of long-range correlations in stride interval fluctuations. J. Appl. Physiol. (Bethesda, Md.: 1985) 80:1448, 1996.Google Scholar
- 19.Huisinga, J. M., M. Filipi, and N. Stergiou. Supervised resistance training results in changes in postural control in multiple sclerosis patients. Mot. Control 16:50–63, 2011.Google Scholar
- 24.Kaipust, J. P., J. M. Huisinga, M. Filipi, and N. Stergiou. Gait variability measures reveal differences between multiple sclerosis patients and healthy controls. Mot. Control 16:229–244, 2012.Google Scholar
- 38.Moe-Nilssen, R. A new method for evaluating motor control in gait under real-life environmental conditions. Part 2: gait analysis. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 13:328–335, 1998.Google Scholar
- 39.Newell, K. M. Applications of nonlinear dynamics to developmental process modeling. In: Degrees of Freedom and the Development of Center of Pressure Profiles, edited by K. M. Newell and P. M. C. Molenaar. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1997, p. 63.Google Scholar
- 43.Pincus, S. M. Approximate entropy as a measure of system complexity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 88:2297, 1991.Google Scholar
- 48.Shumway-Cook, A., and M. H. Woollacott. Motor Control: Theory and Practical Applications. New York, NY: Lippincott Willliams & Wilkins, 2001.Google Scholar
- 50.Sosnoff, J. J., B. M. Sandroff, and R. W. Motl. Quantifying gait abnormalities in persons with multiple sclerosis with minimal disability. Gait Posture 2012.Google Scholar
- 51.Spain, R. I., R. J. St George, A. Salarian, M. Mancini, J. M. Wagner, F. B. Horak, and D. Bourdette. Body-worn motion sensors detect balance and gait deficits in people with multiple sclerosis who have normal walking speed. Gait Posture 2012.Google Scholar
- 52.Stergiou, N., U. H. Buzzi, M. J. Kurz, and J. Heidel. Nonlinear tools in human movement. In: Innovative analyses for human movement, edited by N. Stergiou. Human Kinetics, Champaign: IL, 2004, pp. 63–90.Google Scholar
- 55.Wilhelmsen, K., S. H. Nordahl, and R. Moe-Nilssen. Attenuation of trunk acceleration during walking in patients with unilateral vestibular deficiencies. J. Vestib. Res. Equilib. Orientat. 20:439–446, 2010.Google Scholar
- 57.Wurdeman, S. R., J. M. Huisinga, M. Filipi, and N. Stergiou. Multiple sclerosis affects the frequency content in the vertical ground reaction forces during walking. Clin. Biomech. (Bristol, Avon) 26:207–212, 2011.Google Scholar