The Appropriate Use of Approximate Entropy and Sample Entropy with Short Data Sets
- 4k Downloads
Approximate entropy (ApEn) and sample entropy (SampEn) are mathematical algorithms created to measure the repeatability or predictability within a time series. Both algorithms are extremely sensitive to their input parameters: m (length of the data segment being compared), r (similarity criterion), and N (length of data). There is no established consensus on parameter selection in short data sets, especially for biological data. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to examine the robustness of these two entropy algorithms by exploring the effect of changing parameter values on short data sets. Data with known theoretical entropy qualities as well as experimental data from both healthy young and older adults was utilized. Our results demonstrate that both ApEn and SampEn are extremely sensitive to parameter choices, especially for very short data sets, N ≤ 200. We suggest using N larger than 200, an m of 2 and examine several r values before selecting your parameters. Extreme caution should be used when choosing parameters for experimental studies with both algorithms. Based on our current findings, it appears that SampEn is more reliable for short data sets. SampEn was less sensitive to changes in data length and demonstrated fewer problems with relative consistency.
KeywordsStep length Step width Step time Nonlinear analysis Entropy Gait
Standard error of the difference
Funding was provided by the NASA Nebraska Space Grant & EPSCoR, Patterson Fellowship through the University of Nebraska Medical Center and NIH/NIA (R01AG034995).
- 2.Bar-Yam, Y. Dynamics of Complex Systems. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2003.Google Scholar
- 10.Gell-Mann, M. The Quark and the Jaguar: Adventures in the Simple and the Complex. New York: Owl Books, 1994.Google Scholar
- 14.Kaipust, J. P., J. M. Huisinga, M. Filipi, and N. Stergiou. Gait variability measures reveal differences between multiple sclerosis patients and healthy controls. Mot. Control 16:229–244, 2012.Google Scholar
- 36.Sarlabous, L., A. Torres, J. A. Fiz, J. Gea, J. Martinez-Llorens, J. Morera, and R. Jane. Interpretation of the approximate entropy using fixed tolerance values as a measure of amplitude variations in biomedical signals. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 5967–5970:2010, 2010.Google Scholar