Advertisement

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

, Volume 40, Issue 9, pp 1895–1902 | Cite as

Kidney Stone Erosion by Micro Scale Hydrodynamic Cavitation and Consequent Kidney Stone Treatment

  • Osman Yavuz Perk
  • Muhsincan Şeşen
  • Devrim Gozuacik
  • Ali KoşarEmail author
Article

Abstract

The objective of this study is to reveal the potential of micro scale hydrodynamic bubbly cavitation for the use of kidney stone treatment. Hydrodynamically generated cavitating bubbles were targeted to the surfaces of 18 kidney stone samples made of calcium oxalate, and their destructive effects were exploited in order to remove kidney stones in in vitro experiments. Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) solution was used as the working fluid under bubbly cavitating conditions in a 0.75 cm long micro probe of 147 μm inner diameter at 9790 kPa pressure. The surface of calcium oxalate type kidney stones were exposed to bubbly cavitation at room temperature for 5 to 30 min. The eroded kidney stones were visually analyzed with a high speed CCD camera and using SEM (scanning electron microscopy) techniques. The experiments showed that at a cavitation number of 0.017, hydrodynamic bubbly cavitation device could successfully erode stones with an erosion rate of 0.31 mg/min. It was also observed that the targeted application of the erosion with micro scale hydrodynamic cavitation may even cause the fracture of the kidney stones within a short time of 30 min. The proposed treatment method has proven to be an efficient instrument for destroying kidney stones.

Keywords

Hydrodynamic cavitation Microchannel Cavitation damage Kidney Stone Erosion 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Sabancı University Internal Grant for Research Program under Grant IACF09-00642 and TUBITAK (The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey) Support Program for Scientific and Technological Research Projects Grant, 111M621. Devrim Gozuacik is a recipient of “EMBO” Strategical Development and Installation Grant. The authors would like to thank Prof. M. A. Gulgun (Sabanci University) and M. Tosun (Ecole Polytechnique Federale de Lausanne) for their help in analysis of kidney stones. They are also thankful to Prof. Hakkı Perk from Demetevler Oncology Hospital for providing kidney stone samples. Undergraduate and graduate student support from Faculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering of Sabancı University and equipment utilization support from Sabanci University Nanotechnology Research and Applications Center (SUNUM) is also gratefully appreciated.

References

  1. 1.
    Brennen, C. E. Cavitation and Bubble Dynamics. London, UK: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brennen, C. E. Fundamentals of Multiphase Flow. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chong, X. Subsonic choked flow in the microchannel. Phys. Fluids 18:127104, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Coe, F. L., A. Evan, and E. Worcester. Kidney stone disease. J. Clin. Investig. 115:2598–2608, 2005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crowe, C. T. Multiphase Flow Handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2006.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dales, L. G., G. D. Friedman, E. M. Hunkeler, and R. A. Hiatt. Frequency of urolithiasis in a prepaid medical care program. Am. J. Epidemiol. 115:255–265, 1982.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    DiSario, J., R. Chuttani, J. Croffie, et al. Flow visualization of cavitating flows through a rectangular slot micro-orifice ingrained in a microchannel. Gastrointest. Endosc. 65:750–756, 2007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eisenberg, P. Cavitation Damage, Hydronautics. Incorporated Washington, DC, AD No. 602833, 1963.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Evan, A. P. Physiopathology and etiology of stone formation in the kidney and the urinary tract. Pediatr. Nephrol. J. 25:831–841, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Evan, A. P., and J. A. McAteer. Q-effects of shock wave lithotripsy. In: Kidney Stones: Medical and Surgical Management, Chap. 23, edited by F. L. Coe, M. J. Favus, C. Y. C. Pak, J. H. Parks, and G. M. Preminger. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996, pp. 549–560.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Evan, A. P., and L. R. Willis. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: complications. In: Smith’s Textbook on Endourology, Chap. 41, edited by A. D. Smith, G. H. Badlani, D. H. Bagley, R. V. Clayman, and S. G. Docimo. Hamilton, ON: Decker, Inc., 2007, pp. 353–365.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Evan, A. P., L. R. Willis, J. E. Lingeman, et al. Renal trauma and the risk of long-term complications in shock wave lithotripsy. Nephron 78:1–8, 1998.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heimbach, D., R. Munver, P. Zhong, J. Jacobs, A. Hesse, S. C. Mülles, and G. M. Preminger. Acoustic and mechanical properties of artificial stones in comparison to natural kidney stones. J. Urol. 164:537–544, 2000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Koşar, A., M. Şeşen, O. Oral, Z. Itah, and D. Gozuacik. Bubbly cavitating flow generation and investigation of its erosional nature for biomedical applications. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 58:1337–1346, 2011.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McAteer, J. A., and A. P. Evan. The acute and long-term adverse effects of shock wave lithotripsy. Semin. Nephrol. 28:200, 2008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mishra, C., and Y. Peles. Flow visualization of cavitating flows through a rectangular slot micro-orifice ingrained in a microchannel. Phys. Fluids 17:113602–113615, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sheldon, G. L., and L. Finnie. The mechanism of material removal in the erosive cutting of brittle materials. ASME J. Eng. Ind. 88B:393–400, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Singh, S. K., M. M. Agarwal, and S. Sharma. Medical therapy for calculus disease. Br. J. Urol. Int. 107:356–368, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Skim, S., K. J. Lee, and Y. Seo. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) surface functionalization by low-energy ion-beam irradiation under a reactive O2 environment and its effect on the PEEK/Copper adhesives. Langmuir 20:157–163, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tan, E. C., K. H. Tung, R. Kwok, and K. T. Foo. Percutaneous ultrasonic lithotripsy—its role in the management of renal and upper ureteric stones. Singap. Med. J. 30:45–47, 1989.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wilson, D. M., W. M. O’Fallon, R. S. Malek, L. T. Kurland, and C. M. Johnson. Renal stone epidemiology: a 25-year study in Rochester, Minnesota. Kidney Int. J. 16:624–631, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Biomedical Engineering Society 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Osman Yavuz Perk
    • 1
  • Muhsincan Şeşen
    • 1
  • Devrim Gozuacik
    • 2
  • Ali Koşar
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Mechatronics Engineering Program, Faculty of Engineering and Natural SciencesSabancı UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  2. 2.Biological Sciences and Bioengineering Program, Faculty of Engineering and Natural SciencesSabancı UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations