Development of a Finite Element Model for Blast Brain Injury and the Effects of CSF Cavitation
- 2.1k Downloads
Blast-related traumatic brain injury is the most prevalent injury for combat personnel seen in the current conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, yet as a research community, we still do not fully understand the detailed etiology and pathology of this injury. Finite element (FE) modeling is well suited for studying the mechanical response of the head and brain to blast loading. This paper details the development of a FE head and brain model for blast simulation by examining both the dilatational and deviatoric response of the brain as potential injury mechanisms. The levels of blast exposure simulated ranged from 50 to 1000 kPa peak incident overpressure and 1–8 ms in positive-phase duration, and were comparable to real-world blast events. The frontal portion of the brain had the highest pressures corresponding to the location of initial impact, and peak pressure attenuated by 40–60% as the wave propagated from the frontal to the occipital lobe. Predicted brain pressures were primarily dependent on the peak overpressure of the impinging blast wave, and the highest predicted brain pressures were 30% less than the reflected pressure at the surface of blast impact. Predicted shear strain was highest at the interface between the brain and the CSF. Strain magnitude was largely dependent on the impulse of the blast, and primarily caused by the radial coupling between the brain and deforming skull. The largest predicted strains were generally less than 10%, and occurred after the shock wave passed through the head. For blasts with high impulses, CSF cavitation had a large role in increasing strain levels in the cerebral cortex and periventricular tissues by decoupling the brain from the skull. Relating the results of this study with recent experimental blast testing suggest that a rate-dependent strain-based tissue injury mechanism is the source primary blast TBI.
KeywordsFinite element model Blast overpressure Blast injury Traumatic brain injury Injury mechanism CSF cavitation
This work funded in part by the Multidisciplinary Research Initiative (MURI) program (W911MF-10-1-0526; University of Pennsylvania as prime institution) through the Army Research Office (ARO). We also acknowledge the support of the James H. McElhaney Biomechanics Fellowship for one of the authors (M.B. Panzer).
Supplementary material 1 (AVI 1062 kb)
- 11.Cronin, D. S., C. P. Salisbury, J.-S. Binette, K. Williams, et al. Numerical modeling of blast loading to the head. Paper Presented at PASS, Brussels, Belgium, 2008.Google Scholar
- 15.Gordon, C. C., T. Churchill, C. E. Clauser, B. Bradtmiller, et al. Anthropometric Survey of US Army Personnel: Methods and Summary Statistics. Natick, MA: U.S. Army Natick Research Design and Engineering Center, Natick/TR-89/044, 1989.Google Scholar
- 17.Hallquist, J. O. LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual. Livermore, CA: Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2007.Google Scholar
- 20.Hyde, D. W. Conwep 188.8.131.52, Conventional Weapons Effects Program. Vicksburg, MS: United States Army Corps of Engineers, 2004.Google Scholar
- 21.Iremonger, M. J. Physics of detonation and blast waves. In: Scientific Foundations of Trauma, edited by G. J. Cooper, and et al. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann, 1997, pp. 189–199.Google Scholar
- 28.McElhaney, J. H. Dynamic response of bone and muscle tissue. J. Appl. Phys. 21:1231–1236, 1966.Google Scholar
- 40.Panzer, M. B., C. R. Bass, and B. S. Myers. Numerical study of the role of helmet protection in blast brain injury. Paper presented at PASS, Quebec City, QC, 2010.Google Scholar
- 41.Panzer, M. B., B. S. Myers, and C. R. Bass. Mesh considerations for finite element blast modeling in biomechanics. Comput. Methods Biomech. 2012. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2011.629615.
- 42.Panzer, M. B., C. R. Bass, K. A. Rafaels, J. Shridharani, et al. Primary blast survival and injury risk assessment for repeated blast exposures. J. Trauma. 2012. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31821e8270.
- 44.Rafaels, K. A. Blast brain injury risk. Doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 2011.Google Scholar
- 46.Richmond, D. R., J. T. Yelverton, E. R. Fletcher, and Y. Y. Phillips. Physical correlates of eardrum rupture. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 140:35–41, 1989.Google Scholar
- 49.Schneiderman, A. I., E. R. Braver, and H. K. Kang. Understanding sequelae of injury mechanisms and mild traumatic brain injury incurred during the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan: persistent postconcussive symptoms and posttraumatic stress disorder. Am. J. Epidemiol. 167:1446–1452, 2008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 54.Wardlaw, A. and J. Goeller. Cavitation as a possible traumatic brain injury (TBI) damage mechanism. Paper presented, College Park, MD, 2010.Google Scholar
- 56.Wood, G. W., M. B. Panzer, J. K. Shridharani, K. A. Matthews, et al. Attenuation of blast overpressure behind ballistic protective vest. Paper presented at PASS, Quebec City, QC, 2010.Google Scholar