Advertisement

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

, Volume 40, Issue 7, pp 1530–1544 | Cite as

Development of a Finite Element Model for Blast Brain Injury and the Effects of CSF Cavitation

  • Matthew B. PanzerEmail author
  • Barry S. Myers
  • Bruce P. Capehart
  • Cameron R. Bass
Article

Abstract

Blast-related traumatic brain injury is the most prevalent injury for combat personnel seen in the current conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, yet as a research community, we still do not fully understand the detailed etiology and pathology of this injury. Finite element (FE) modeling is well suited for studying the mechanical response of the head and brain to blast loading. This paper details the development of a FE head and brain model for blast simulation by examining both the dilatational and deviatoric response of the brain as potential injury mechanisms. The levels of blast exposure simulated ranged from 50 to 1000 kPa peak incident overpressure and 1–8 ms in positive-phase duration, and were comparable to real-world blast events. The frontal portion of the brain had the highest pressures corresponding to the location of initial impact, and peak pressure attenuated by 40–60% as the wave propagated from the frontal to the occipital lobe. Predicted brain pressures were primarily dependent on the peak overpressure of the impinging blast wave, and the highest predicted brain pressures were 30% less than the reflected pressure at the surface of blast impact. Predicted shear strain was highest at the interface between the brain and the CSF. Strain magnitude was largely dependent on the impulse of the blast, and primarily caused by the radial coupling between the brain and deforming skull. The largest predicted strains were generally less than 10%, and occurred after the shock wave passed through the head. For blasts with high impulses, CSF cavitation had a large role in increasing strain levels in the cerebral cortex and periventricular tissues by decoupling the brain from the skull. Relating the results of this study with recent experimental blast testing suggest that a rate-dependent strain-based tissue injury mechanism is the source primary blast TBI.

Keywords

Finite element model Blast overpressure Blast injury Traumatic brain injury Injury mechanism CSF cavitation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work funded in part by the Multidisciplinary Research Initiative (MURI) program (W911MF-10-1-0526; University of Pennsylvania as prime institution) through the Army Research Office (ARO). We also acknowledge the support of the James H. McElhaney Biomechanics Fellowship for one of the authors (M.B. Panzer).

Supplementary material

Supplementary material 1 (AVI 1062 kb)

10439_2012_519_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.6 mb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 1653 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Ackerman, M. J. The visible human project. Proc. IEEE 86:504–511, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bain, A. C., and D. F. Meaney. Tissue-level thresholds for axonal damage in an experimental model of central nervous system white matter injury. J. Biomech. Eng. 122:615, 2000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bass, C. R., M. B. Davis, K. A. Rafaels, S. Rountree, et al. A methodology for assessing blast protection in explosive ordinance disposal bomb suits. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 11:347–361, 2005.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bass, C. R., M. B. Panzer, K. A. Rafaels, G. W. Wood, et al. Brain injuries from blast. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 40:185–202, 2012.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bass, C. R., K. A. Rafaels, and R. S. Salzar. Pulmonary injury risk assessment for short-duration blasts. J. Trauma 65:604–615, 2008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bazant, Z. P. Spurious reflection of elastic waves in nonuniform finite element grids. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 16:91–100, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bloomfield, I. G., I. H. Johnston, and L. E. Bilston. Effects of proteins, blood cells and glucose on the viscosity of cerebrospinal fluid. Pediatr. Neurosurg. 28:246–251, 1998.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bolander, R., B. Mathie, C. Bir, D. Ritzel, et al. Skull flexure as a contributing factor in the mechanism of injury in the rat when exposed to a shock wave. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 39:2550–2559, 2011.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chafi, M., G. Karami, and M. Ziejewski. Biomechanical assessment of brain dynamic responses due to blast pressure waves. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 38:490–504, 2010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Champion, H. R., J. B. Holcomb, and L. A. Young. Injuries from explosions: physics, biophysics, pathology, and required research focus. J. Trauma 66:1468–1477, 2009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cronin, D. S., C. P. Salisbury, J.-S. Binette, K. Williams, et al. Numerical modeling of blast loading to the head. Paper Presented at PASS, Brussels, Belgium, 2008.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elkin, B. S., and B. Morrison, III. Region-specific tolerance criteria for the living brain. Stapp Car Crash J. 51:127–138, 2007.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Frey, B., S. Franz, A. Sheriff, A. Korn, et al. Hydrostatic pressure induced death of mammalian cells engages pathways related to apoptosis or necrosis. Cell. Mol. Biol. 50:459–467, 2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Galford, J. E., and J. H. McElhaney. A viscoelastic study of scalp, brain, and dura. J. Biomech. 3:211–221, 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gordon, C. C., T. Churchill, C. E. Clauser, B. Bradtmiller, et al. Anthropometric Survey of US Army Personnel: Methods and Summary Statistics. Natick, MA: U.S. Army Natick Research Design and Engineering Center, Natick/TR-89/044, 1989.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gross, A. G. A new theory on the dynamics of brain concussion and brain injury. J. Neurosurg. 15:548–561, 1958.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hallquist, J. O. LS-DYNA Keyword User’s Manual. Livermore, CA: Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2007.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Herbert, E., S. Balibar, and F. Caupin. Cavitation pressure in water. Phys. Rev E. 74:041603, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Holland, C. M., E. E. Smith, I. Csapo, M. E. Gurol, et al. Spatial distribution of white-matter hyperintensities in alzheimer disease, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, and healthy aging. Stroke 39:1127–1133, 2008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hyde, D. W. Conwep 2.1.0.8, Conventional Weapons Effects Program. Vicksburg, MS: United States Army Corps of Engineers, 2004.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Iremonger, M. J. Physics of detonation and blast waves. In: Scientific Foundations of Trauma, edited by G. J. Cooper, and et al. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann, 1997, pp. 189–199.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kaster, T., I. Sack, and A. Samani. Measurement of the hyperelastic properties of ex vivo brain tissue slices. J. Biomech. 44:1158–1163, 2011.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kleiven, S., and W. N. Hardy. Correlation of an FE model of the human head with local brain motion-consequences for injury prediction. Stapp Car Crash J. 46:123–144, 2002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lubock, P., and W. Goldsmith. Experimental cavitation studies in a model head-neck system. J. Biomech. 13:1041–1052, 1980.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lynnerup, N., J. G. Astrup, and B. Sejrsen. Thickness of the human cranial diploe in relation to age, sex and general body build. Head Face Med. 1:1–13, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mahmadi, K., S. Itoh, T. Hamada, N. Aquelet, et al. Numerical studies of wave generation using spiral detonating cord. Mater. Sci. Forum 465–466:439–444, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Manas, P., and B. M. Mackey. Morphological and physiological changes induced by high hydrostatic pressure in exponential and stationary-phase cells of escherichia coli: relationship with cell death. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:1545–1554, 2004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    McElhaney, J. H. Dynamic response of bone and muscle tissue. J. Appl. Phys. 21:1231–1236, 1966.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    McElhaney, J. H., J. L. Fogle, J. W. Melvin, R. R. Haynes, et al. Mechanical properties on cranial bone. J. Biomech. 3:495–511, 1970.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Moore, D. F., A. Jerusalem, M. Nyein, L. Noels, et al. Computational biology—modeling of primary blast effects on the central nervous system. Neuroimage. 47:T10–T20, 2009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Moore, D. F., R. A. Radovitzky, L. Shupenko, A. Klinoff, et al. Blast physics and central nervous system injury. Future Neurol. 3:243–250, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Moss, W. C., M. J. King, and E. G. Blackman. Skull flexure from blast waves: a mechanism for brain injury with implications for helmet design. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103:108702, 2009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nelson, T. J., T. Clark, E. T. Stedje-Larsen, C. T. Lewis, et al. Close proximity blast injury patterns from improvised explosive devices in Iraq: a report of 18 cases. J. Trauma 65:212–217, 2008.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nicolle, S., M. Lounis, and R. Willinger. Shear properties of brain tissue over a frequency range relevant for automotive impact situations: new experimental results. Stapp Car Crash J. 48:239–258, 2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nusholtz, G. S., B. Wylie, and L. G. Glascoe. Cavitation/boundary effects in a simple head impact model. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 66:661–667, 1995.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nusholtz, G. S., E. B. Wylie, and L. G. Glascoe. Internal cavitation in simple head impact model. J. Neurotrauma 12:707–714, 1995.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nyein, M. K., A. M. Jason, L. Yu, C. M. Pita, et al. In silico investigation of intracranial blast mitigation with relevance to military traumatic brain injury. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107:20703–20708, 2010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Okie, S. Traumatic brain injury in the war zone. N. Engl J. Med. 352:2043–2047, 2005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Owens, B. D., J. F. Kragh, Jr., J. C. Wenke, J. Macaitis, et al. Combat wounds in operation Iraqi freedom and operation enduring freedom. J. Trauma 64:295–299, 2008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Panzer, M. B., C. R. Bass, and B. S. Myers. Numerical study of the role of helmet protection in blast brain injury. Paper presented at PASS, Quebec City, QC, 2010.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Panzer, M. B., B. S. Myers, and C. R. Bass. Mesh considerations for finite element blast modeling in biomechanics. Comput. Methods Biomech. 2012. doi: 10.1080/10255842.2011.629615.
  42. 42.
    Panzer, M. B., C. R. Bass, K. A. Rafaels, J. Shridharani, et al. Primary blast survival and injury risk assessment for repeated blast exposures. J. Trauma. 2012. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31821e8270.
  43. 43.
    Prange, M. T., D. F. Meaney, and S. S. Margulies. Defining brain mechanical properties: effects of region, direction, and species. Stapp Car Crash J. 44:205–213, 2000.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rafaels, K. A. Blast brain injury risk. Doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, 2011.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rafaels, K. A., C. R. Bass, R. S. Salzar, M. B. Panzer, et al. Survival risk assessment for primary blast exposures to the head. J. Neurotrauma 28:2319–2328, 2011.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Richmond, D. R., J. T. Yelverton, E. R. Fletcher, and Y. Y. Phillips. Physical correlates of eardrum rupture. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 140:35–41, 1989.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ruan, J. S., T. Khalil, and A. I. King. Human head dynamic response to side impact by finite element modeling. J. Biomech. Eng. 113:276–283, 1991.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sack, I., B. Beierbach, U. Hamhaber, D. Klatt, et al. Non invasive measurement of brain viscoelasticity using magnetic resonance elastography. NMR Biomed. 21:265–271, 2008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Schneiderman, A. I., E. R. Braver, and H. K. Kang. Understanding sequelae of injury mechanisms and mild traumatic brain injury incurred during the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan: persistent postconcussive symptoms and posttraumatic stress disorder. Am. J. Epidemiol. 167:1446–1452, 2008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Taylor, P. A., and C. C. Ford. Simulation of blast-induced early-time intracranial wave physics leading to traumatic brain injury. J. Biomech. Eng. 131:061007, 2009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Terrio, H., L. A. Brenner, B. J. Ivins, J. M. Cho, et al. Traumatic brain injury screening: preliminary findings in a US army brigade combat team. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 24:14–23, 2009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Valk, P. E., and W. P. Dillon. Radiation injury of the brain. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 12:45–62, 1991.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Warden, D. L. Military TBI during the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 21:398, 2006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wardlaw, A. and J. Goeller. Cavitation as a possible traumatic brain injury (TBI) damage mechanism. Paper presented, College Park, MD, 2010.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Wilkins, M. L. Use of artificial viscosity in multidimensional fluid dynamic calculations. J. Comput. Phys. 36:281–303, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Wood, G. W., M. B. Panzer, J. K. Shridharani, K. A. Matthews, et al. Attenuation of blast overpressure behind ballistic protective vest. Paper presented at PASS, Quebec City, QC, 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Biomedical Engineering Society 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew B. Panzer
    • 1
    Email author
  • Barry S. Myers
    • 1
  • Bruce P. Capehart
    • 2
    • 3
  • Cameron R. Bass
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.OEF/OIF Veterans Program and Mental Health Service LineDurham VA Medical CenterDurhamUSA
  3. 3.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesDuke University School of MedicineDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations