In Vivo Validation of Numerical Prediction for Turbulence Intensity in an Aortic Coarctation
- 571 Downloads
This paper compares numerical predictions of turbulence intensity with in vivo measurement. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was carried out on a 60-year-old female with a restenosed aortic coarctation. Time-resolved three-directional phase-contrast (PC) MRI data was acquired to enable turbulence intensity estimation. A contrast-enhanced MR angiography (MRA) and a time-resolved 2D PCMRI measurement were also performed to acquire data needed to perform subsequent image-based computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling. A 3D model of the aortic coarctation and surrounding vasculature was constructed from the MRA data, and physiologic boundary conditions were modeled to match 2D PCMRI and pressure pulse measurements. Blood flow velocity data was subsequently obtained by numerical simulation. Turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) was computed from the resulting CFD data. Results indicate relative agreement (error ≈10%) between the in vivo measurements and the CFD predictions of TKE. The discrepancies in modeled vs. measured TKE values were within expectations due to modeling and measurement errors.
KeywordsComputational fluid dynamics Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging Turbulent kinetic energy Blood flow
The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the support of the Fulbright Commission, the Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation, the Swedish Brain Foundation, the Swedish Research Council and the Center for Industrial Information Technology.
- 1.Boussel, L., V. Rayz, A. Martin, G. Acevedo-Bolton, M. T. Lawton, R. Higashida, W. S. Smith, W. L. Young, and D. Saloner. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements in intracranial aneurysms in vivo of flow patterns, velocity fields, and wall shear stress: comparison with computational fluid dynamics. Magn. Reson. Med. 61(2):409–417, 2009.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Deissler, R. G. Turbulent Fluid Motion. Philadelphia: Taylor and Francis, 1998.Google Scholar
- 3.Dyverfeldt, P., R. Gardhagen, A. Sigfridsson, M. Karlsson, and T. Ebbers. On MRI turbulence quantification. Magn. Reson. Med. 27(7):913–922, 2009.Google Scholar
- 7.Firmin, D. N., P. D. Gatehouse, J. P. Konrad, G. Z. Yang, P. J. Kilner, and D. B. Longmore. Rapid 7-dimensional imaging of pulsatile flow. In: Proceedings in Computers in Cardiology, 1993.Google Scholar
- 8.Ford, M. D., H. N. Nikolov, J. S. Milner, S. P. Lownie, E. M. DeMont, W. Kalata, F. Loth, D. W. Holdsworth, and D. A. Steinman. Virtual angiography for visualization and validation of computational models of aneurysm hemodynamics. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 24(12):1586–1592, 2005PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Kim, H. J., C. A. Figueroa, T. J. R. Hughes, K. E. Jansen, and C. A. Taylor. Augmented lagrangian method for constraining the shape of velocity profiles at outlet boundaries for three-dimensional finite element simulations of blood flow. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 198(45–46):3551–3566, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Kung, E. O., A. S. Les, C. A. Figueroa, F. Medina, K. Arcaute, R. B. Wicker, M. V. McConnell, and C. A. Taylor. In vitro validation of finite element analysis of blood flow in deformable models. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 39:1947–1960, 2011.Google Scholar
- 19.LaDisa, J. F., Jr., R. J. Dholakia, C. A. Figueroa, I. E. Vignon-Clementel, F. P. Chan, M. M. Samyn, J. R. Cava, C. A. Taylor, and J. A. Feinstein. Computational simulations demonstrate altered wall shear stress in aortic coarctation patients previously treated by resection with end-to-end anastomosis. Congenit. Heart Dis. 6(5):432–443, 2011.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Les, A. S., S. C. Shadden, C. A. Figueroa, J. M. Park, M. M. Tedesco, R. J. Herfkens, R. L. Dalman, and C. A. Taylor. Quantification of hemodynamics in abdominal aortic aneurysms during rest and exercise using magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 38:1288–1313, 2010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Nichols, W. W., and M. F. O’Rourke. McDonald’s Blood Flow in Arteries: Theoretical, Experimental and Clinical Principles. London: Hodder Arnold Publication, 2005.Google Scholar
- 26.Papathanasopoulou, P., S. Zhao, U. Kohler, M. B. Robertson, Q. Long, P. Hoskins, X. Y. Xu, and I. Marshall. MRI measurement of time-resolved wall shear stress vectors in a carotid bifurcation model, and comparison with CFD predictions. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 17(2):153–162, 2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar