The Effect of Play Type and Collision Closing Distance on Head Impact Biomechanics
- 855 Downloads
Football accounts for 55% of concussions to collegiate athletes. In the National Football League, players are at a greater risk for concussion during kickoffs and punts compared to rushing and passing plays. The two primary purposes of this study were to determine if game-related special teams head impacts were greater in magnitude than head impacts sustained during offensive and defensive plays, and to better understand the effect closing distance between players (short vs. long) had on head impact magnitude. Collegiate football players were enrolled in a prospective cohort study assessing head impact biomechanics during special teams, offensive, and defensive collisions; long closing distance (≥10 yards) and short closing distance (<10 yards) impacts were also studied. Data were analyzed using random intercepts general linear mixed models. Long closing distance collisions generated more severe head impacts than short closing distances. Collisions occurring on special teams plays over long closing distances were most severe while collisions occurring on special teams and defensive plays over short closing distances resulted in the least severe impacts. Decreasing the impact severity of collisions in collegiate football may be accomplished by reducing the closing distance prior to impact.
KeywordsBiomechanics Concussion Helmet Injury threshold Mild traumatic brain injury
This study was supported in part by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Athletic Trainers’ Association Research & Education Foundation, and the National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment.
- 1.Broglio, S. P., B. Schnebel, J.J. Sosnoff, S. Shin, X. Feng, X. He, and J. Zimmerman. The biomechanical properties of concussions in high school football. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2010.Google Scholar
- 5.Collins, M. W., S. H. Grindel, M. R. Lovell, D. E. Dede, D. J. Moser, B. R. Phalin, S. Nogle, M. Wasik, D. Cordry, K. M. Daugherty, S. F. Sears, G. Nicolette, P. Indelicato, and D. B. McKeag. Relationship between concussion and neuropsychological performance in college football players. JAMA 282:964–970, 1999.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Dick, R., M. S. Ferrara, J. Agel, R. Courson, S. W. Marshall, M. J. Hanley, and F. Reifsteck. Descriptive epidemiology of collegiate men’s football injuries: national collegiate athletic association injury surveillance system, 1988–1989 through 2003–2004. J. Athl. Train. 42:221–233, 2007.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 13.Guskiewicz, K. M., J. P. Mihalik, V. Shankar, S. W. Marshall, D. H. Crowell, S. M. Oliaro, M. F. Ciocca, and D. N. Hooker. Measurement of head impacts in collegiate football players: relationship between head impact biomechanics and acute clinical outcome after concussion. Neurosurgery 61:1244–1252, 2007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Mueller, F. O., and B. Colgate. Annual Survey of Football Injury Research: 1931–2009. Chapel Hill, NC: National Center for Catastrophic Sport Injury Research, p. 30, 2010.Google Scholar
- 22.Pellman, E. J., J. W. Powell, D. C. Viano, I. R. Casson, A. M. Tucker, H. Feuer, M. Lovell, J. F. Waeckerle, and D. W. Robertson. Concussion in professional football: epidemiological features of game injuries and review of the literature—part 3. Neurosurgery 54:81–94, 2004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar