Evaluation of Three Animal Models for Concussion and Serious Brain Injury
Three animal models were evaluated in this study involving head impacts of the rat, including the Marmarou drop-weight and two momentum-exchange techniques. In series 1, 36 Wistar rats were hit on the side of the free-moving head using Marmarou’s 450 g impact mass at 4.4, 5.4, and 6.3 m/s. Head acceleration was measured and injuries were observed. The 6.3-m/s side impact resulted in no deaths, no skull fractures, infrequent contusions, and some injuries consistent with diffuse axonal injury. In series 2, 57 Marmarou drop-weight tests were conducted to study head biomechanical responses. Marmarou’s technique involves a head impact followed by prolonged loading into a foam pad under the animal. Based on the literature, the 2 m (6.3 m/s) Marmarou drop causes death, skull fracture, brain and spinal cord contusions, and diffuse axonal injury. These injuries are more severe than that occurring with impact of similar mass and velocity to the free-moving head. Impacts to the free-moving head provide more realistic animal models to study concussion and severe brain injury.
KeywordsConcussion Brain injury Head impact Traumatic brain injury Animal models
Funding for this research was provided by the National Football League and NFL Charities, which is funded by the NFL Players Association and the League. The authors gratefully appreciate their support.
- 8.Dixon, C. E., P. M. Kochanek, H. Q. Yan, J. K. Schiding, R. G. Griffith, E. Baum, D. W. Marion, and S. T. DeKosky. One-year study of spatial memory performance, brain morphology, and cholinergic markers after moderate controlled cortical impact in rats. J. Neurotrauma 16(2):109–122, 1999.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Gurdjian, E. S., V. R. Hodgson, L. M. Thomas, and L. M. Patrick. Significance of relative movements of scalp, skull, and intracranial contents during impact injury of the head. J. Neurosurg. 29(1):70–72, 1968.Google Scholar
- 17.Gurdjian, E. S. Impact Head Injury: Mechanistic, Clinical and Preventative Correlations. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas Publisher, 1975; (Library of Congress No. 74 13844).Google Scholar
- 19.Gurgjian, E. S., H. R. Lissner, F. R. Latimer, B. F. Haddad, and J. E. Webster. Quantitative determination of acceleration and intracranial pressure in experimental head injury; preliminary report. Neurology 3(6):417–423, 1953.Google Scholar
- 20.Gurgjian, E. S., H. R. Lissner, J. E. Webster, F. R. Latimer, and B. F. Haddad. Studies on experimental concussion. Neurology 4:674–681, 1954.Google Scholar
- 26.Kochanek, P. M., D. W. Marion, W. Zhang, J. K. Schiding, M. White, A. M. Palmer, R. S. Clark, M. E. O’Malley, S. D. Styren, C. Ho, et al. Severe controlled cortical impact in rats: assessment of cerebral edema, blood flow, and contusion volume. J. Neurotrauma 12(6):1015–1025, 1995.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Meyer, J. S., and D. Denny-Brown. Studies of cerebral circulation in brain injury. II. Cerebral concussion. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. Suppl. 7(4):529–544, 1955.Google Scholar
- 36.Meyer, J. S., and D. Denny-Brown. Studies of cerebral circulation in brain injury. I. Validity of combined local cerebral electropolarography, thermometry and steady potentials as an indicator of local circulatory and functional changes. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. Suppl. 7(4):511–528, 1955.Google Scholar
- 37.Meyer, J. S. Studies of cerebral circulation in brain injury. III. Cerebral contusion, laceration and brain stem injury. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. Suppl. 8(1):107–116, 1956.Google Scholar
- 38.Morris, R. Developments of a water-maze procedure for studying spatial learning in the rat. J. Neurosci. Methods 11(1):47–60, 1984.Google Scholar
- 51.Viano, D. C., and I. V. Lau. A viscous tolerance criterion for soft tissue injury assessment. J. Biomech. 21(5):387–399, 1988.Google Scholar