Football Helmet Drop Tests on Different Fields Using an Instrumented Hybrid III Head
- 442 Downloads
An instrumented Hybrid III head was placed in a Schutt ION 4D football helmet and dropped on different turfs to study field types and temperature on head responses. The head was dropped 0.91 and 1.83 m giving impacts of 4.2 and 6.0 m/s on nine different football fields (natural, Astroplay, Fieldturf, or Gameday turfs) at turf temperatures of −2.7 to 23.9 °C. Six repeat tests were conducted for each surface at 0.3 m (1′) intervals. The Hybrid III was instrumented with triaxial accelerometers to determine head responses for the different playing surfaces. For the 0.91-m drops, peak head acceleration varied from 63.3 to 117.1 g and HIC15 from 195 to 478 with the different playing surfaces. The lowest response was with Astroplay, followed by the engineered natural turf. Gameday and Fieldturf involved higher responses. The differences between surfaces decreased in the 1.83 m tests. The cold weather testing involved higher accelerations, HIC15 and delta V for each surface. The helmet drop test used in this study provides a simple and convenient means of evaluating the compliance and energy absorption of football playing surfaces. The type and temperature of the playing surface influence head responses.
KeywordsProtective headgear Recreation and sport Concussion Helmets Sport equipment
- 2.Baker, S. W., and M. J. Bell. The laying characteristics on natural turf and synthetic turf surfaces for association football. J. Sports Turf Res. Inst. 62:9–37, 1989.Google Scholar
- 4.Birch, P. Thirty Games a Week—A Study of the Use of Artificial Grass Pitches in Islington and Hackney, Vol. 33. London: The Sports Council, 1975.Google Scholar
- 8.Ekstrand, J., M. Hägglund, and C. W. Fuller. Comparison of injuries sustained on artificial turf and grass by male and female elite football players. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports. 2010. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01118.x. [Epub ahead of print].
- 11.Fuller, C. W., R. W. Dick, J. Corlette, and R. Schmalz. Comparison of the incidence, nature and cause of injuries sustained on grass and new generation artificial turf by male and female football players. Part 1: Match injuries. Br. J. Sports Med. 41(Suppl. 1):i20–i26, 2007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Fuller, C. W., R. W. Dick, J. Corlette, and R. Schmalz. Comparison of the incidence, nature and cause of injuries sustained on grass and new generation artificial turf by male and female football players. Part 2: Training injuries. Br. J. Sports Med. 41(Suppl. 1):i27–i32, 2007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.SAE J1733. Sign convention for vehicle crash testing. Surface Vehicle Information Report, Society of Automotive Engineers, December 1994.Google Scholar
- 28.SAE J211-1. Instrumentation for impact test. Part 1. Electronic Instrumentation. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers, March 1995.Google Scholar
- 29.SAE J855. Human tolerance to impact conditions as related to motor vehicle design. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers, April 1980.Google Scholar
- 32.Shorten, M. R., and J. A. Himmelsbach. Sports surfaces and the risk of traumatic brain injury. In: Sports Surfaces, edited by B. M. Nigg, G. K. Cole, and D. J. Stefanyshyn. Calgary, AB: University of Calgary, 2003.Google Scholar
- 33.Soligard, T., R. Bahr, and T. E. Andersen. Injury risk on artificial turf and grass in youth tournament football. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 2010. [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar