Body-Worn Sensor Design: What Do Patients and Clinicians Want?
- 1.5k Downloads
User preferences need to be taken into account in order to be able to design devices that will gain acceptance both in a clinical and home setting. Sensor systems become redundant if patients or clinicians do not want to work with them. The aim of this systematic review was to determine both patients’ and clinicians’ preferences for non-invasive body-worn sensor systems. A search for relevant articles and conference proceedings was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Current Contents Connect, and EEEI explore. In total 843 papers were identified of which only 11 studies were deemed suitable for inclusion. A range of different clinically relevant user groups were included. The key user preferences were that a body-worn sensor system should be compact, embedded and simple to operate and maintain. It also should not affect daily behavior nor seek to directly replace a health care professional. It became apparent that despite the importance of user preferences, they are rarely considered and as such there is a lack of high-quality studies in this area. We therefore would like to encourage researchers to focus on the implications of user preferences when designing wearable sensor systems.
KeywordsWearable sensors User preferences Medical devices User-centered design MEMS Biosensors
- 3.Carter, J., and M. Rosen. Unobtrusive sensing of activities of daily living: a preliminary report. In: Proceedings of the First Joint BMES/EMBS Conference, Oct 13–16, 1999. IEEE Press, 1999, p. 678.Google Scholar
- 7.Fensli, R., and E. Boisen. Human factors affecting the patient’s acceptance of wireless biomedical sensors. In: Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies, edited by A. Fred, J. Filipe, and H. Gamboa. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2009, pp. 402–412.Google Scholar
- 8.Fensli, R., J. Dale, P. O’Reilly, J. O’Donoghue, D. Sammon, and T. Gundersen. Towards improved healthcare performance: examining technological possibilities and patient satisfaction with wireless body area networks. J. Med. Syst. 34(4):767–775, 2009.Google Scholar
- 10.Fraile, J., J. Bajo, J. Corchado, and A. Abraham. Applying wearable solutions in dependent environments. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 14(6):1459–1467, 2010.Google Scholar
- 12.Gemperle, F., C. Kasabach, J. Stivoric, M. Bauer, and R. Martin. Design for wearability. In: Digest of Papers Second International Symposium on Wearable Computers, 1998, pp. 116–122.Google Scholar
- 15.Haggard, P., and D. M. Wolpert. Disorders of body schema. In: Higher-order Motor Disorders: From Neuroanatomy and Neurobiology to Clinical Neurology, edited by H.-J. Freund. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, pp. 261–272.Google Scholar
- 16.Hong, X., C. Nugent, W. Liu, J. Ma, S. McClean, B. Scotney, et al. Uncertain information management for ADL monitoring in smart homes. In: Intelligent Patient Management, edited by S. McClean, P. Millard, E. El-Darzi, and C. Nugent. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2009, pp. 315–332.Google Scholar
- 17.Kumar, S., K. Kambhatla, F. Hu, M. Lifson, and Y. Xiao. Ubiquitous computing for remote cardiac patient monitoring: a survey. Int. J. Telemed. Appl. 2008:459185, 2008.Google Scholar
- 18.Kuper, A., L. Lingard, and W. Levinson. Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ. 337:a1035, 2008.Google Scholar
- 28.Sawyer, C. Do it by design: an introduction to human factors in medical devices. FDA, 1997. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm094957.htm.
- 31.Timmermans, A. A. A., H. A. M. Seelen, R. P. J. Geers, P. K. Saini, S. Winter, J. te Vrugt, et al. Sensor-based arm skill training in chronic stroke patients: results on treatment outcome, patient motivation, and system usability. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 18(3):284–292, 2010.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Wilson, S., R. Davies, T. Stone, J. Hammerton, P. Ware, S. Mawson, N. Harris, C. Eccleston, H. Zheng, N. Black, and G. Mountain. Developing a telemonitoring system for stroke rehabilitation. In: Proceedings of Ergonomics Society Annual Conference, 2007.Google Scholar