Mechanical and Structural Contribution of Non-Fibrillar Matrix in Uniaxial Tension: A Collagen-Agarose Co-Gel Model
- 811 Downloads
The mechanical role of non-fibrillar matrix and the nature of its interaction with the collagen network in soft tissues remain poorly understood, in part because of the lack of a simple experimental model system to quantify these interactions. This study’s objective was to examine mechanical and structural properties of collagen-agarose co-gels, utilized as a simplified model system, to understand better the relationships between the collagen network and non-fibrillar matrix. We hypothesized that the presence of agarose would have a pronounced effect on microstructural reorganization and mechanical behavior. Samples fabricated from gel solutions containing 1.0 mg/mL collagen and 0, 0.125, or 0.25% w/v agarose were evaluated via scanning electron microscopy, incremental tensile stress-relaxation tests, and polarized light imaging. While the incorporation of agarose did not dramatically alter collagen network morphology, agarose led to concentration-dependent changes in mechanical and structural properties. Specifically, resistance of co-gels to volume change corresponded with differences in fiber reorientation and elastic/viscoelastic mechanics. Results demonstrate strong relationships between tissue properties and offer insight into behavior of tissues of varying Poisson’s ratio and fiber kinematics. Results also suggest that non-fibrillar material may have significant effects on properties of artificial and native tissues even in tension, which is generally assumed to be collagen dominated.
KeywordsNon-fibrillar matrix Fiber-matrix interactions Collagen gel Agarose Soft tissue analog Mechanical and structural properties
The authors thank Victor Lai, Xiao Zhong, and Sadie Doggett for help with SEM acquisition, mechanical testing, and data analysis, respectively. We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of NIH Grants R01-EB005813 and F32-EB012352, and the NSF’s support of the University of Minnesota’s Characterization Facility.
Conflict of Interest
No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.
- 3.Buckwalter, J. A. Musculoskeletal soft tissues. In: Orthopaedic Surgery: The Essentials, edited by M. Baratz, A. D. Watson, and J. E. Imbriglia. New York, NY: Thieme, 1999.Google Scholar
- 15.Lake, S. P. Anisotropic, Inhomogeneous and Nonlinear Structure-Function of Human Supraspinatus Tendon. Department of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 2009.Google Scholar
- 16.Lake, S. P. et al. Evaluation of affine fiber kinematics in human supraspinatus tendon using quantitative projection plot analysis. Biomech. Model Mechanobiol. 2011 (in press).Google Scholar
- 19.Lund, A. W., et al. Osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in defined protein beads. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B 87(1):213–221, 2008.Google Scholar
- 21.Malvern, L. E. Introduction to the Mechanics of a Continuous Medium. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1969.Google Scholar
- 30.Stylianopoulos, T., and V. H. Barocas. Volume-averaging theory for the study of the mechanics of collagen networks. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 196(31–32):2981–2990, 2007.Google Scholar
- 36.Weiss, J. A., B. N. Maker, and S. Govindjee. Finite element implementation of incompressible, transversely isotropic hyperelasticity. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 135:107–128, 1996.Google Scholar
- 38.Yeh, G., and J. L. Esterhai. Orthopaedics. In: The Surgical Review: An Integrated Basic and Clinical Science Guide, edited by D. Kreisal, A. S. Krupnick, and L. R. Kaiser. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2000.Google Scholar