Needle-tract seeding refers to the implantation of tumor cells by contamination when instruments, such as biopsy needles, are employed to examine, excise, or ablate a tumor. The incidence of this iatrogenic phenomenon is low but it entails serious consequences. Here, as a new method for preventing neoplasm seeding, it is proposed to cause electrochemical reactions at the instrument surface so that a toxic microenvironment is formed. In particular, the instrument shaft would act as the cathode, and the tissues would act as the electrolyte in an electrolysis cell. By employing numerical models and experimental observations reported by researchers on Electrochemical Treatment of tumors, it is numerically showed that a sufficiently toxic environment of supraphysiological pH can be created in a few seconds without excessive heating. Then, by employing an ex vivo model consisting of meat pieces, validity of the conclusions provided by the numerical model concerning pH evolution is confirmed. Furthermore, a simplified in vitro model based on bacteria, instead of tumor cells, is implemented for showing the plausibility of the method. Depending on the geometry of the instrument, suitable current densities will probably range from about 5 to 200 mA/cm2, and the duration of DC current delivery will range from a few seconds to a few minutes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Lluis Mir, director of the laboratory UMR 8203 of the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (Villejuif, France), provided comments and suggestions that helped to improve the quality of the manuscript. AI’s research is currently supported by a Ramón y Cajal fellowship from the Spanish Ministry for Science and Innovation.
Castillo, O. A., and G. Vitagliano. Port site metastasis and tumor seeding in oncologic laparoscopic urology. Urology 71:372–378, 2008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davalos, R. V., B. Rubinsky, and L. M. Mir. Theoretical analysis of the thermal effects during in vivo tissue electroporation. Bioelectrochemistry 61:99–107, 2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dromi, S. A., J. Locklin, and B. J. Wood. Radiofrequency cauterization: an alternative to reduce post-biopsy hemorrhage. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 28:681–682, 2005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finch, J. G., B. Fosh, A. Anthony, E. Slimani, M. Texler, D. P. Berry, A. R. Dennison, and G. J. Maddern. Liver electrolysis: pH can reliably monitor the extent of hepatic ablation in pigs. Clin. Sci. (Lond.) 102:389–395, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, C., S. Gabriel, and E. Corthout. The dielectric properties of biological tissues: I. Literature survey. Phys. Med. Biol. 41:2231–2249, 1996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gravante, G., S. L. Ong, M. S. Metcalfe, N. Bhardwaj, G. J. Maddern, D. M. Lloyd, and A. R. Dennison. Experimental application of electrolysis in the treatment of liver and pancreatic tumours: principles, preclinical and clinical observations and future perspectives. Surg. Oncol. 2009. doi:10.1016/j.suronc.2009.12.002.
Ivorra, A. Tissue electroporation as a bioelectric phenomenon: basic concepts. In: Irreversible Electroporation, edited by B. Rubinsky. Berlin: Springer, 2010, pp. 23–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotnik, T., D. Miklavcic, and L. M. Mir. Cell membrane electropermeabilization by symmetrical bipolar rectangular pulses. Part II. Reduced electrolytic contamination. Bioelectrochemistry 54:91–95, 2001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwo, S., and J. C. Grotting. Does stereotactic core needle biopsy increase the risk of local recurrence of invasive breast cancer? Breast J. 12:191–193, 2006.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laeseke, P. F., T. C. Winter, III, C. L. Davis, K. R. Stevens, C. D. Johnson, F. J. Fronczak, J. G. Webster, and F. T. Lee, Jr. Postbiopsy bleeding in a porcine model: reduction with radio-frequency ablation—preliminary results. Radiology 227:493–499, 2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y. W., C. L. Chen, Y. S. Chen, C. C. Wang, S. H. Wang, and C. C. Lin. Needle tract implantation of hepatocellular carcinoma after fine needle biopsy. Dig. Dis. Sci. 52:228–231, 2007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moritz, A. R., and F. C. Henriques. Studies of thermal injury: II. The relative importance of time and surface temperature in the causation of cutaneous burns. Am. J. Pathol. 23:695–720, 1947.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, E., and E. Fontes. Mathematical modelling of physicochemical reactions and transport processes occurring around a platinum cathode during the electrochemical treatment of tumours. Bioelectrochemistry 53:213–224, 2001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilsson, E., H. von Euler, J. Berendson, A. Thorne, P. Wersall, I. Naslund, A. S. Lagerstedt, K. Narfstrom, and J. M. Olsson. Electrochemical treatment of tumours. Bioelectrochemistry 51:1–11, 2000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, B., S. Furman, and D. J. W. Escher. Input signals to pacemakers in a hospital environment. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 167:823–834, 1969.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, R. N., and G. E. Meharg. Electrolysis: observations from 13 years and 140,000 hours of experience. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 33:662–666, 1995.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saulis, G., R. Lape, R. Praneviciute, and D. Mickevicius. Changes of the solution pH due to exposure by high-voltage electric pulses. Bioelectrochemistry 67:101–108, 2005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, M. A., B. Hegab, C. Hyde, B. Guo, J. A. Buckels, and D. F. Mirza. Needle track seeding following biopsy of liver lesions in the diagnosis of hepatocellular cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut 57:1592–1596, 2008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigliano, R., L. Marelli, D. Yu, N. Davies, D. Patch, and A. K. Burroughs. Seeding following percutaneous diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for hepatocellular carcinoma. What is the risk and the outcome? Seeding risk for percutaneous approach of HCC. Cancer Treat. Rev. 33:437–447, 2007.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takamori, R., L. L. Wong, C. Dang, and L. Wong. Needle-tract implantation from hepatocellular cancer: is needle biopsy of the liver always necessary? Liver Transpl. 6:67–72, 2000.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Vijh, A. K. Electrochemical treatment (ECT) of cancerous tumours: necrosis involving hydrogen cavitation, chlorine bleaching, pH changes, electroosmosis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 29:663–665, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
von Euler, H., E. Nilsson, J. M. Olsson, and A. S. Lagerstedt. Electrochemical treatment (EChT) effects in rat mammary and liver tissue. In vivo optimizing of a dose-planning model for EChT of tumours. Bioelectrochemistry 54:117–124, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woitzik, J., and J. K. Krauss. Polyethylene sheath device to reduce tumor cell seeding along the needle tract in percutaneous biopsy. Surg. Endosc. 17:311–314, 2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xin, Y., F. Xue, B. Ge, F. Zhao, B. Shi, and W. Zhang. Electrochemical treatment of lung cancer. Bioelectromagnetics 18:8–13, 1997.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar