Annals of Biomedical Engineering

, Volume 38, Issue 7, pp 2237–2251 | Cite as

Are We Studying What Matters? Health Priorities and NIH-Funded Biomedical Engineering Research

  • Jessica B. Rubin
  • A. David Paltiel
  • W. Mark Saltzman


With the founding of the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) in 1999, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) made explicit its dedication to expanding research in biomedical engineering. Ten years later, we sought to examine how closely federal funding for biomedical engineering aligns with U.S. health priorities. Using a publicly accessible database of research projects funded by the NIH in 2008, we identified 641 grants focused on biomedical engineering, 48% of which targeted specific diseases. Overall, we found that these disease-specific NIH-funded biomedical engineering research projects align with national health priorities, as quantified by three commonly utilized measures of disease burden: cause of death, disability-adjusted survival losses, and expenditures. However, we also found some illnesses (e.g., cancer and heart disease) for which the number of research projects funded deviated from our expectations, given their disease burden. Our findings suggest several possibilities for future studies that would serve to further inform the allocation of limited research dollars within the field of biomedical engineering.


National Institutes of Health Research priorities Disease-specific research NIBIB Statistical analysis Public health 


  1. 1.
    American Association for the Advancement of Science. Table. NIH Budgets by Institute and Funding Mechanism. AAAS, 2008. Available at: Accessed 8 March 2010.
  2. 2.
    Biomedical Engineering Source. Available at: Accessed 8 March 2010
  3. 3.
    Black, D. A., and J. D. Pole. Priorities in biomedical research: indices of burden. Brit. J. Prevent. Soc. Med. 29:222–227, 1975.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bronzino, J. D. Introduction and preface. In: The Biomedical Engineering Handbook, 2nd edn, edited by J. Bronzino. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cohen, J. W., and N. A. Krauss. Spending and service use among people with fifteen most costly medical conditions. Health Aff. 22(2):129–138, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Committee on NIH Research Priority-Setting Process. Scientific Opportunities and Public Needs: Improving Priority Setting and Public Input at the National Institutes of Health. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    FY 2005 Budget in Brief: National Institutes of Health. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2004.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Griffith, L. G., and A. J. Grodzinsky. Advances in biomedical engineering. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 285(5):556–561, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gross, C. P., G. F. Anderson, and N. R. Powe. The relation between funding by the National Institutes of Health and the burden of disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 340(24):1881–1887, 1999.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hendee, W. R., S. Chien, C. D. Maynard, et al. The National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering: history, status, and potential impact. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 30:2–10, 2002.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kirschstein, R. Disease-specific Estimates of Direct and Indirect Costs of Illness and NIH Support: Fiscal Year 2000 Update. National Institutes of Health, Office of the Director, 2000.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moses, III, H., E. R. Dorsey, D. H. Matheson, and S. O. Thier. Financial anatomy of biomedical research. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 294(11):1333–1342, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    The National Institutes of Health. Institutes, Centers, and Offices. NIH, 2008. Available at: Accessed 8 March 2010.
  14. 14.
    The NIH Task Force of the Bioengineering Division, Basic Engineering Group, Council on Engineering. Position Statement on the FY 2006 Budget Request for the National Institutes of Health. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Council on Engineering, 2005.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Neumann, P. J., A. B. Rosen, D. Greenberg, et al. Can we better prioritize resources for cost-utility research? Med. Decis. Mak. 25(4):429–436, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Steinbrook, R. Health care and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. N. Engl. J. Med. 360:1057–1060, 2009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Success Rates for all NIH Competing Grant Applications by NIH Institutes/Centers, Grant Mechanism, and Activity Codes. NIH Office of Extramural Research: Fiscal Year 2008.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Working Group on Priority Setting. Setting research priorities at the National Institutes of Health. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, 1997.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    World Health Organization. The World Health Report 2002: Reducing Risks, Promoting Healthy Life. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Biomedical Engineering Society 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jessica B. Rubin
    • 1
    • 2
  • A. David Paltiel
    • 1
  • W. Mark Saltzman
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Public HealthYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biomedical EngineeringYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations