Annals of Biomedical Engineering

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 651–660 | Cite as

A Dynamic Heart System to Facilitate the Development of Mitral Valve Repair Techniques

  • Andrew L. Richards
  • Richard C. Cook
  • Gil Bolotin
  • Gregory D. BucknerEmail author


Objective: The development of a novel surgical tool or technique for mitral valve repair can be hampered by cost, complexity, and time associated with performing animal trials. A dynamically pressurized model was developed to control pressure and flowrate profiles in intact porcine hearts in order to quantify mitral regurgitation and evaluate the quality of mitral valve repair. Methods: A pulse duplication system was designed to replicate physiological conditions in explanted hearts. To test the capabilities of this system in measuring varying degrees of mitral regurgitation, the output of eight porcine hearts was measured for two different pressure waveforms before and after induced mitral valve failure. Four hearts were further repaired and tested. Measurements were compared with echocardiographic images. Results: For all trials, cardiac output decreased as left ventricular pressure was increased. After induction of mitral valve insufficiencies, cardiac output decreased, with a peak regurgitant fraction of 71.8%. Echocardiography clearly showed increases in regurgitant severity from post-valve failure and with increased pressure. Conclusions: The dynamic heart model consistently and reliably quantifies mitral regurgitation across a range of severities. Advantages include low experimental cost and time associated with each trial, while still allowing for surgical evaluations in an intact heart.


Dynamic heart model Mitral regurgitation Mitral valve repair 



This work was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Grant Number 1 R01 HL075489-03A1. The authors would like to thank Dr. Teresa DeFrancesco for her expertise in acquiring echocardiographic images, William Griffin for his assistance with the design of the system, and Molly Purser for her aid in experimental trials.


  1. 1.
    15. Araki Y, Usui A, Kawaguchi O, Saito S, Song MH, Akita T, Ueda Y. 2005. Pressure-volume relationship in isolated working heart with crystalloid perfusate in swine and imaging the valve motion. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 28(3):435–42. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.06.015 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    13. Arita M, Tono S, Kasegawa H, Umezu M. 2004. Multiple purpose simulator using a natural porcine mitral valve. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 12(4):350–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Braunwald E, Welch GH, Jr., Sarnoff SJ. Hemodynamic effects of quantitatively varied experimental mitral regurgitation. Circ Res. 1957;5(5):539–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    5. Carpentier AF, Lessana A, Relland JY, Belli E, Mihaileanu S, Berrebi AJ, Palsky E, Loulmet DF. The “physio-ring”: An advanced concept in mitral valve annuloplasty. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;60(5):1177,85; discussion 1185–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    2. Chinchoy E, Soule CL, Houlton AJ, Gallagher WJ, Hjelle MA, Laske TG, Morissette J, Iaizzo PA, 2000. Isolated four-chamber working swine heart model. Ann Thorac Surg. 70(5):1607–14. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(00)01977-9 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    7. Enriquez-Sarano M, Miller FA,Jr., Hayes SN, Bailey KR, Tajik AJ, Seward JB. 1995. Effective mitral regurgitant orifice area: Clinical use and pitfalls of the proximal isovelocity surface area method. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1;25(3):703–9. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00434-R PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    8. Enriquez-Sarano M, Sinak LJ, Tajik AJ, Bailey KR, Seward JB. Changes in effective regurgitant orifice throughout systole in patients with mitral valve prolapse. A clinical study using the proximal isovelocity surface area method. Circulation. 1995 15;92(10):2951–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    12. Espino DM, Hukins DW, Shepherd DE, Buchan KG, 2006. Mitral valve repair: An in vitro comparison of the effect of surgical repair on the pressure required to cause mitral valve regurgitation. J Heart Valve Dis. 15(3):375–81.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    11. Espino DM, Hukins DW, Shepherd DE, Watson MA, Buchan K. 2006. Determination of the pressure required to cause mitral valve failure. Med Eng Phys. 28(1):36–41. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.04.011 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    6. Feigenbaum, HB, Armstrong, WG, Ryan, TP. Feigenbaum’s echocardiography. Philadelphia : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, c2005.; 2005. 790 p.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    14. He S, Fontaine AA, Schwammenthal E, Yoganathan AP, Levine RA. 1997. Integrated mechanism for functional mitral regurgitation: Leaflet restriction versus coapting force: In vitro studies. Circulation. 16;96(6):1826–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    16. Hill AJ, Laske TG, Coles JA, Jr., Sigg DC, Skadsberg ND, Vincent SA, Soule CL, Gallagher WJ, Iaizzo PA, 2005. In vitro studies of human hearts. Ann Thorac Surg. 79(1):168–77 Medline. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.06.080 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    4. Kaplan SR, Bashein G, Sheehan FH, Legget ME, Munt B, Li XN, Sivarajan M, Bolson EL, Zeppa M, Arch MZ, Martin RW. 2000. Three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of annular shape changes in the normal and regurgitant mitral valve. Am Heart J. 139(3):378–87. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8703(00)90077-2 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    10. Katoh T, Ikeda N, Nishi K, Gohra H, Hamano K, Noda H, Fujimura Y, Esato K, 1999. A newly designed adapter for testing an ex vivo mitral valve apparatus. Artif Organs. 23(10):920–3. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1594.1999.06293.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    9. Moulopoulos, SD. Cardiomechanics. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas; 1963. 193 p.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    3. Rosenstrauch D, Akay HM, Bolukoglu H, Behrens L, Bryant L, Herrera P, Eya K, Tuzun E, Clubb FJ,Jr., Radovancevic B, Frazier OH, Kadipasaoglu KA. Ex vivo resuscitation of adult pig hearts. Tex Heart Inst J. 2003;30(2):121–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Biomedical Engineering Society 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew L. Richards
    • 1
  • Richard C. Cook
    • 2
  • Gil Bolotin
    • 3
  • Gregory D. Buckner
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.Division of Cardiovascular SurgeryUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  3. 3.Department of Cardiac SurgeryRambam Medical CenterHaifaIsrael
  4. 4.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleigh USA

Personalised recommendations