Mechanical Modeling of Stents Deployed in Tapered Arteries
Abstract
The biomechanical interaction of stents and the arteries into which they are deployed is a potentially important consideration for long-term success. Adverse arterial reactions to excessive stress and the resulting damage have been linked to the development of restenosis. Complex geometric features often encountered in these procedures can confound treatment. In some cases, it is desirable to deploy a stent across a region in which the diameter decreases significantly over the length of the stent. This study aimed to assess the final arterial diameter and circumferential stress in tapered arteries into which two different stents were deployed (one stiff and one less stiff). The artery wall was assumed to be made of a strain stiffening material subjected to large deformations, with a 10% decrease in diameter over the length of the stent. A commercially available finite element code was employed to solve the contact problem between the two elastic bodies. The stiffer stent dominated over arterial taper, resulting in a nearly constant final diameter along the length of the stent, and very high stresses, particularly at the distal end. The less stiff stent followed more closely the tapered contour of the artery, resulting in lower artery wall stresses. More compliant stents should be considered for tapered artery applications, perhaps even to the exclusion of tapered stents.
Keywords
Stress Restenosis Vascular interventions Stent Finite element analysisNotes
Acknowledgment
This research was supported by NIH Grant No. R01 EB000115.
References
- 1.Bedoya J., Stent Design and Arterial Mechanics: Parameterization Tools Using the Finite Element Method, 2005. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University: College Station, TX. Google Scholar
- 2.Bedoya J., et al., Effects of stent design parameters on normal artery wall mechanics. J. Biomech. Eng. 128(5):757–765, 2006. doi: 10.1115/1.2246236 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Berry J.L., et al., Hemodynamics and wall mechanics of a compliance matching stent: in vitro and in vivo analysis. J. Vasc. Inter. Radiol. 13(1):97–105, 2002. doi: 10.1016/S1051-0443(07)60015-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Bosiers M., et al., Carotid artery stenting: which stent for which lesion? Vascular 13(4):205–210, 2005. doi: 10.2310/6670.2005.50072 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Cheng C.P., et al., In vivo MR angiographic quantification of axial and twisting deformations of the superficial femoral artery resulting from maximum hip and knee flexion. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 17(6):979–987, 2006PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Ding Z., M.H. Friedman, Quantification of 3-D coronary arterial motion using clinical biplane cineangiograms. Int. J. Card. Imaging. 16(5):331–346, 2000. doi: 10.1023/A:1026590417177 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Farb A., et al., Morphological predictors of restenosis after coronary stenting in humans. Circulation 105(25):2974–2980, 2002. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000019071.72887.BD PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Holzapfel G.A., M. Stadler, C.A. Schulze-Bauer, A layer-specific three-dimensional model for the simulation of balloon angioplasty using magnetic resonance imaging and mechanical testing. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 30(6):753–767, 2002. doi: 10.1114/1.1492812 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Humphrey, J.D. Cardiovascular Solid Mechanics: Cells, Tissues, and Organs. New York: Springer verlag, 2002Google Scholar
- 10.Humphrey J.D., et al., Computer-aided vascular experimentation: a new electromechanical test system. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 21(1):33–43. 1993, doi: 10.1007/BF02368162 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Indolfi C., et al., Rat carotid artery dilation by PTCA balloon catheter induces neointima formation in presence of IEL rupture. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 283(2):H760–H767, 2002PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Kastrati A., et al., Restenosis after coronary placement of various stent types. Am. J. Cardiol. 87(1):34–39, 2001. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01268-6 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Lally C., F. Dolan, P.J. Prendergast, Cardiovascular stent design and vessel stresses: a finite element analysis [erratum appears in J. Biomech. 2006;39(9):1760]. J. Biomech. 38(8):1574–1581, 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.07.022 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Migliavacca F., et al., Mechanical behavior of coronary stents investigated through the finite element method. J. Biomech. 35(6):803–811, 2002. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00033-7 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Milnor W., Hemodynamics, 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1989Google Scholar
- 16.Rogers C., et al., Balloon-artery interactions during stent placement: a finite element analysis approach to pressure, compliance, and stent design as contributors to vascular injury. Circ. Res. 84(4):378–383, 1999PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 17.Rosamond W., et al., Heart disease and stroke statistics–2007 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation 115(5):e69–171, 2007. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.179918 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Serruys P.W., N. Kukreja, Late stent thrombosis in drug-eluting stents: return of the ‘VB syndrome’. Nat. Clin. Pract. Cardiovasc. Med.. 3(12):637, 2006. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio0722 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Timmins L.H., et al., Stented artery biomechanics and device design optimization. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 45(5):505–513, 2007. doi: 10.1007/s11517-007-0180-3 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Zubaid M., C. Buller, G.B. Mancini, Normal angiographic tapering of the coronary arteries. Can. J. Cardiol. 18(9):973–980, 2002PubMedGoogle Scholar