A Biodegradable Slotted Tube Stent Based on Poly(l-lactide) and Poly(4-hydroxybutyrate) for Rapid Balloon-Expansion
- 765 Downloads
Safe vascular stent application requires rapid expansion of the stent to minimize the risk of procedural ischemia. While high expansion speeds can be achieved with metallic stents, they are not necessarily feasible with biodegradable polymeric stents due to the viscoelastic material behavior. This study reports on a novel biodegradable polymer blend material based on poly(l-lactide) (PLLA) and poly(4-hydroxybutyrate) (P4HB), and describes the mechanical properties and in vitro degradation behavior of a balloon-expandable slotted tube stent concept. The stent prototypes with nominal dimensions of 6.0 × 25 mm were manufactured by laser machining of solution cast PLLA/P4HB tubes (I.D. = 2.8 mm, d = 300 μm). The stents were expanded within 1 min by balloon inflation to 8 bar, after 5 min preconditioning in 37 °C water. Recoil and collapse pressure were 4.2% and 1.1 bar, respectively. During in vitro degradation collapse pressure initially increased to a maximum at 4 w and then decreased thereafter. After 48 w, molecular weight was decreased by 82%. In summary, the PLLA/P4HB slotted tube stents allowed for rapid balloon-expansion and exhibited adequate mechanical scaffolding properties suitable for a broad range of vascular and non-vascular applications.
KeywordsPLLA P4HB Recoil Collapse Laser machining Mechanical properties Degradation
The authors wish to express their appreciation to Dipl.-Ing. Peter Behrens and Dr.-Ing. Wolfram Schmidt, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Rostock, for sharing their expertise in stent testing. Dipl.-Ing. Steffen Mews, Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University of Rostock, is gratefully acknowledged for his technical support during the stent degradation study.
- 2.Biamino, G. Biodegradable stents in the sfa: are they the answer? International Symposium on Endovascular Therapy 2006Google Scholar
- 3.Bünger, C. M., N. Grabow, K. Sternberg, M. Goosmann, K. P. Schmitz, H. J. Kreutzer, H. Ince, S. Klische, C. A. Nienaber, D. P. Martin, S. F. Williams, E. Klar, and W. Schareck. A biodegradable stent based on poly(l-lactide) and poly(4-hydroxybutyrate) for peripheral vascular application: preliminary experience in the pig. J. Endovasc. Ther. to appear October 2007Google Scholar
- 4.Bünger C. M., N. Grabow, K. Sternberg, L. Ketner, C. Kröger, B. Lorenzen, K. Hauenstein, K. P. Schmitz, H. J. Kreutzer, D. Lootz, H. Ince, C. A. Nienaber, E. Klar, W. Schareck 2006 Iliac anastomotic stenting with a biodegradable poly-l-lactide stent: A preliminary study after 1 and 6 weeks. J. Endovasc. Ther. 13:539–548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Grabow N., C. Bunger, K. Sternberg, S. Mews, K. Schmohl, K. P. Schmitz 2007 Mechanical properties of a biodegradable balloon-expandable stent from poly(l-lactide) for peripheral vascular applications. ASME J. Med. Dev. 1:84–88Google Scholar
- 9.Grabow N., S. Mews, K. Schmohl, K. Sternberg, C. M. Bünger, K. P. Schmitz 2006 Long-term in vitro degradation study for a biodegradable PLLA stent. Biomaterialien (München) 7:154Google Scholar
- 11.Herzog C., C. Grebe, A. Mahnken, J. O. Balzer, M. G. Mack, S. Zangos, H. Ackermann, S. Schaller, T. Seifert, B. Ohnesorge, T. J. Vogl 2005 Peripheral artery stent visualization and in-stent stenosis analysis in 16-row computed tomography: An in-vitro evaluation. Eur. Radiol. 15:2276–2283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Isotalo T. M., J. P. Nuutine, A. Vaajanen, P. M. Martikainen, M. Laurila, P. Tormala, M. Talja, T. L. Tammela 2006 Biocompatibility properties of a new braided biodegradable urethral stent: a comparison with a biodegradable spiral and a braided metallic stent in the rabbit urethra. BJU Int. 97:856–859PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Schmidt W., K. P. Schmitz. Devices. In: Lanzer P., editor. Mastering of Endovascular Techniques – a Guide to Excellence. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006, pp. 114–135Google Scholar
- 25.Tanimoto, S., P. W. Serruys, L. Thuesen, D. Dudek, B. de Bruyne, B. Chevalier, and J. A. Ormiston. Comparison of in vivo acute stent recoil between the bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent and the everolimus-eluting cobalt chromium coronary stent: insights from the ABSORB and SPIRIT trials. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2007Google Scholar