Annals of Biomedical Engineering

, Volume 35, Issue 9, pp 1608–1616 | Cite as

An Indentation Technique to Characterize the Mechanical and Viscoelastic Properties of Human and Porcine Corneas

  • Mark Ahearne
  • Ying Yang
  • Kong Y. Then
  • Kuo-Kang Liu
Article

Abstract

Cornea is a load-bearing tissue whose mechanical and viscoelastic characteristics are not well understood, due to the challenge associated with most of the measurements. A novel indentation technique has been developed for mechanical characterization of human and porcine corneal tissue, using a tailored depth-sensing microindentation instrument. During indentation, the corneas were suspended by clamping the edges of the cornea, thus allowing depth-sensing measurement free from the complication of the backing substrate. The deformation displacement and the amount of force applied by the indenter were used to obtain hysteresis and stress relaxation data for both human and porcine corneas. Optical coherence tomography was used to measure the thickness of the cornea. Simple theoretical analyses have been undertaken to explain the loading–unloading and the stress relaxation data. The effect of swelling on the mechanical properties of the cornea was also examined. Porcine corneas appeared to be less stiff and to demonstrate more linear response than human corneas under loading. More importantly, it is shown that swelling reduced the strength of the corneas. Our results demonstrate that this new indentation system can be used to characterize the mechanical and viscoelastic properties of corneas.

Keywords

Instrumentation Stress relaxation Hysteresis Biomechanics 

References

  1. 1.
    Ahearne M., Yang Y., El Haj A. J., Then K. Y., Liu K. K. (2005) Characterizing the viscoelastic properties of thin hydrogel-based constructs for tissue engineering applications. J. R. Soc. Interface 2:455–463PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson K., El-Sheikh A., Newson T. (2004) Application of structural analysis to the mechanical behaviour of the cornea. J. R. Soc. Interface 1:3–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andreassen T. T., Simonsen A. H., Oxlund H. (1980) Biomechanical properties of keratoconus and normal corneas. Exp. Eye Res. 31:435–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Begley M. R., Mackin T. J. (2004) Spherical indentation of freestanding circular thin films in the membrane regime. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 52:2005–2023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Borene M. L., Barocas V. H., Hubel A. (2004) Mechanical and cellular changes during compaction of a collagen-sponge-based corneal stromal equivalent. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 32:274–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fung Y. C. (1993) Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues, 2nd. ed. Springer Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gauthier O., Müller R., von Stechow D., Lamy B., Weiss P., Bouler J., Aguado E., Daculsi G. (2005) In vivo bone regeneration with injectable calcium phosphate biomaterial: A three-dimensional micro-computed tomographic, biomechanical and SEM study. Biomaterials 26:5444–5453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grabner G., Eilmsteiner R., Steindl C., Ruckhofer J., Mattioli R., Husinsky W. (2005) Dynamic corneal imaging. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 31:163–174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hay, J. L. and G. M. Pharr. Instrumented indentation testing. In: ASM Handbook Volume 8, Mechanical Testing and Evaluation, edited by H. Kuhn and D. Medlin. 10th ed. Materials Park, OH: ASM International, 2000, pp. 232–243.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hjortdal J. Ø., Møller-Pedersen T., Ivarsen A., Ehlers N. (2005) Corneal power, thickness, and stiffness: Results of a prospective randomized controlled trial of PRK and LASIK for myopia. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 31:21–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hoeltzel D. A., Altman P., Buzard K., Choe K. (1992) Strip extensiometry for comparison of the mechanical response of bovine, rabbit, and human corneas. J. Biomech. Eng. 114:202–215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ju B. F., Liu K. K., Ling S. F., Ng W. H. (2002) A novel technique for characterizing elastic properties of thin biological membrane. Mech. Mater. 34:749–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ju B. F., Wan K. T., Liu K. K. (2004) Indentation of a square elastomeric thin film by a flat-ended cylindrical punch in the presence of long-range intersurface forces. J. Appl. Phys. 96:6159–6163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kampmeier J., Radt B., Birngruber R., Brinkmann R. (2000) Thermal and biomechanical parameters of porcine cornea. Cornea 19:355–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kasprzak H. T., Sultanova N. G. (1994) Simple holographic interferometric method of investigating the Poisson coefficient and elasticity moduli. Opt. Eng. 33:194–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kobayashi A. S., Staberg L. G., Schlegel W. A. (1973) Viscoelastic properties of human cornea. Exp. Mech. 13:497–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Luce D. A. (2005) Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 31:156–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mandell R. B., Polse K. A., Brand R. J., Vastine D., Demartini D., Flom R. (1989) Corneal hydration control in Fuchs’ dystrophy. Invest Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 30:845–852PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Maurice D. M. (1988) Mechanics of the Cornea. In: Cavanagh H. D. (ed) The Cornea: Transactions of the World Congress on the Cornea III. Raven Press, New York, pp. 187–193Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Muller L. J., Pels E., Vrensen G. F. (2001) The effects of organ-culture on the density of keratocytes and collagen fibers in human corneas. Cornea 20:86–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Muscat S., McKay N., Parks S., Kemp E., Keating D. (2002) Repeatability and reproducibility of corneal thickness measurements by optical coherence tomography. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 43:1791–1795PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Orwin E. J., Borene M. L., Hubel A. (2003) Biomechanical and optical characteristics of a corneal stromal equivalent. J. Biomech. Eng. 125:439–444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reichlin T., Wild A., Dürrenberger M., Daniels A. U., Aebi U., Hunziker P. R., Stolz M. (2005) Investigating native coronary artery endothelium in situ and in cell culture by scanning force microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 152:52–65PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Shin T. J., Vito R. P., Johnson L. W., McCarey B. E. (1997) The distribution of strain in the human cornea. J. Biomech. 30:497–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Seiler T., Matallana M., Sendler S., Bende T. (1992) Does Bowman’s layer determine the biomechanical properties of the cornea?. Refract. Corneal Surg. 8:139–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stewart W. C., Jenkins J. N., Stewart J. A. (2005) Corneal thickness after refractive surgery. Ophthalmology 112:1637PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Storm C., Pastore J. J., MacKintosh F. C., Lubensky T. C., Janmey P. A. (2005) Nonlinear elasticity in biological gels. Nature 435:191–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Walkenbach R. J., Boney F., Ye G. S. (1992) Corneal function after storage in dexsol or optisol. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 33:2454–2458PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wan K. T. (1999) Fracture mechanics of a shaft loaded blister test-transition from a bending plate to a stretching membrane. J. Adhesion 70:209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wan K. T., Liao K. (1999) Measuring mechanical properties of thin flexible films by a shaft-loaded blister test. Thin Solid Films 352:167–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wan K. T., Mai Y. W. (1995) Fracture mechanics of a shaft loaded blister of thin flexible membrane on rigid substrate. Int. J. Fract. 74:181–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wang H., Prendiville P. L., McDonnell P. J., Chang W. V. (1996) An ultrasonic technique for the measurement of the elastic moduli of human cornea. J. Biomech. 29:1633–1636PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yang F. (2003) Thickness effect on the indentation of an elastic layer. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 358:226–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zeng Y., Yang J., Huang K., Lee Z., Lee X. (2001) A comparison of biomechanical properties between human and porcine cornea. J. Biomech. 34:533–537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Biomedical Engineering Society 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark Ahearne
    • 1
  • Ying Yang
    • 1
  • Kong Y. Then
    • 2
  • Kuo-Kang Liu
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Science and Technology in Medicine, School of MedicineKeele UniversityStoke-on-TrentUK
  2. 2.Birmingham and Midland Eye CentreCity HospitalBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations