Advertisement

Mechanical Interlocking of Engineered Cartilage to an Underlying Polymeric Substrate: Towards a Biohybrid Tissue Equivalent

  • Lisa Romito
  • Guillermo A. Ameer
Article

Abstract

This study investigates the feasibility of engineering a biohybrid cartilage equivalent (BCE) with the long-term goal of restoring the mechanical integrity and interfacial characteristics of severely damaged cartilage. The BCE depends on the successful adhesion, via mechanical interlocking, of a cartilage layer to a nondegradable composite scaffold or prosthesis. The model scaffold, consisting of a nonwoven mesh bonded to a solid core, was seeded with bovine articular chondrocytes. High molecular weight poly(l-lactic acid), which has a slow degradation time, was used to model the nondegradable polymer. Biochemical and histological analysis demonstrate that the BCE can support the growth of a cartilaginous matrix for at least 6 weeks in culture. Mechanical testing of the BCE showed cartilage adhesion strength increased from 19.27±1.62 to 43.79±3.88 kPa between 35 and 50 days in culture. Nonmechanically interlocked cartilage achieved less than 5% of this adhesion strength. For the first time, atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used to characterize surface topography of tissue-engineered cartilage. Surface roughness of constructs after 8 and 10 weeks ranged from 153 to 171 nm, falling within the range of native cartilage (100–600 nm). This study demonstrates the feasibility of creating a biohybrid cartilage equivalent by mechanically interlocking a cartilaginous layer to an underlying polymeric matrix.

Keywords

Cartilage Tissue engineering Cell functionalization Biolayer Prosthesis Lubrication Cell adhesion Chondrocytes 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by the AO Research Foundation. We thank Dr. Gajendra Shekhawat for his help in obtaining AFM images as well as Evanston Hospital and Northwestern Memorial Hospital for histological sectioning and staining expertise. We also thank Swissland Packing Co. for donating the bovine knees.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Ahsan, T., and R. L. Sah. Biomechanics of integrative cartilage repair. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 7:29–40, 1999.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alsberg, E., E. E. Hill, and D. J. Mooney. Craniofacial tissue engineering. Crit. Rev. Oral. Biol. Med. 12:64–75, 2001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amstutz, H. C., P. Campbell, N. Kossovsky, and I. C. Clarke. Mechanism and clinical significance of wear debris-induced osteolysis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 276:7–18, 1992.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boynton, E. L., M. Henry, J. Morton, and J. P. Waddell. The inflammatory response to particulate wear debris in total hip arthroplasty. Can. J. Surg. 38:507–515, 1995.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buma, P., N. N. Ramrattan, T. G. van Tienen, and R. P. Veth. Tissue engineering of the meniscus. Biomaterials 25:1523–1532, 2004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Farndale, R. W., D. J. Buttle, and A. J. Barrett. Improved quantitation and discrimination of sulphated glycosaminoglycans by use of dimethylmethylene blue. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 883:173–177, 1986.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Felix, N. A., and L. E. Paulos. Current status of meniscal transplantation. Knee 10:13–17, 2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Freed, L. E., A. P. Hollander, I. Martin, J. R. Barry, R. Langer, and G. Vunjak-Novakovic. Chondrogenesis in a cell-polymer-bioreactor system. Exp. Cell Res. 240:58–65, 1998.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gao, J., J. E. Dennis, L. A. Solchaga, A. S. Awadallah, V. M. Goldberg, and A. I. Caplan. Tissue-engineered fabrication of an osteochondral composite graft using rat bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue Eng. 7:363–371, 2001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hailey, J. L., J. Fisher, D. Dowson, S. A. Sampath, R. Johnson, and M. Elloy. A tribological study of a series of retrieved accord knee explants. Med. Eng. Phys. 16:223–228, 1994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hansson, U., G. Blunn, and L. Ryd. Histologic reactions to particulate wear debris in different mesenchymal tissues: Studies on the nonreplaced compartment from revised uni-knees. J. Arthroplasty 19:481–487, 2004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hills, B. A., and R. W. Crawford. Normal and prosthetic synovial joints are lubricated by surface-active phospholipid: A hypothesis. J. Arthroplasty 18:499–505, 2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoemann, C. D., J. Sun, V. Chrzanowski, and M. D. Buschmann. A multivalent assay to detect glycosaminoglycan, protein, collagen, RNA, and DNA content in milligram samples of cartilage or hydrogel-based repair cartilage. Anal. Biochem. 300:1–10, 2002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hollander, A. P., I. Pidoux, A. Reiner, C. Rorabeck, R. Bourne, and A. R. Poole. Damage to type II collagen in aging and osteoarthritis starts at the articular surface, originates around chondrocytes, and extends into the cartilage with progressive degeneration. J. Clin. Invest. 96:2859–2869, 1995.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hung, C. T., et al. Anatomically shaped osteochondral constructs for articular cartilage repair. J. Biomech. 36:1853–1864, 2003. [Erratum appears in J. Biomech., 2004 December;37(12):1953. Note: Taki, Erica (corrected to Takai, Erica)].PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jurvelin, J. S., D. J. Muller, M. Wong, D. Studer, A. Engel, and E. B. Hunziker. Surface and subsurface morphology of bovine humeral articular cartilage as assessed by atomic force and transmission electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 117:45–54, 1996.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Keene, D. R., J. T. Oxford, and N. P. Morris. Ultrastructural localization of collagen types II, IX, and XI in the growth plate of human rib and fetal bovine epiphyseal cartilage: Type XI collagen is restricted to thin fibrils. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 43:967–979, 1995.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim, Y. J., R. L. Sah, J. Y. Doong, and A. J. Grodzinsky. Fluorometric assay of DNA in cartilage explants using Hoechst 33258. Anal. Biochem. 174:168–176, 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lewis, P. L., N. T. Brewster, and S. E. Graves. The pathogenesis of bone loss following total knee arthroplasty. Orthop. Clin. N Am. 29:187–197, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mercuri, L. G. Considering total temporomandibular joint replacement. Cranio 17:44–48, 1999.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nizegorodcew, T., G. Gasparini, G. Maccauro, A. Todesca, and E. De Santis. Massive osteolysis induced by high molecular weight polyethylene wear debris. Int. Orthop. 21:14–18, 1997.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Patel, R. V., and J. J. Mao. Microstructural and elastic properties of the extracellular matrices of the superficial zone of neonatal articular cartilage by atomic force microscopy. Front. Biosci. 8:a18–a25, 2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Pickard, J. E., J. Fisher, E. Ingham, and J. Egan. Investigation into the effects of proteins and lipids on the frictional properties of articular cartilage. Biomaterials 19:1807–1812, 1998.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Randolph, M. A., K. Anseth, and M. J. Yaremchuk. Tissue engineering of cartilage. Clin. Plast. Surg. 30:519–537, 2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sachlos, E., and J. T. Czernuszka. Making tissue engineering scaffolds work. Review: The application of solid freeform fabrication technology to the production of tissue engineering scaffolds. Eur. Cell Mater. 5:29–39, 2003 [discussion 39–40].PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sah, R. L., Y. J. Kim, J. Y. Doong, A. J. Grodzinsky, A. H. Plaas, and J. D. Sandy. Biosynthetic response of cartilage explants to dynamic compression. J. Orthop. Res. 7:619–636, 1989.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Santavirta, S. Compatibility of the totally replaced hip. Reduction of wear by amorphous diamond coating. Acta Orthop. Scand. Suppl. 74:1–19, 2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schaefer, D., et al. In vitro generation of osteochondral composites. Biomaterials 21:2599–2606, 2000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schaefer, D., et al. Tissue-engineered composites for the repair of large osteochondral defects. Arthritis Rheum. 46:2524–2534, 2002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schek, R. M., J. M. Taboas, S. J. Segvich, S. J. Hollister, and P. H. Krebsbach. Engineered osteochondral grafts using biphasic composite solid free-form fabricated scaffolds. Tissue Eng. 10:1376–1385, 2004.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sharma, B. E., and J. H. Elisseeff. Engineering structurally organized cartilage and bone tissues. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 32:148–159, 2004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sherwood, J. K., et al. A three-dimensional osteochondral composite scaffold for articular cartilage repair. Biomaterials 23:4739–4751, 2002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Suciu, A. N., T. Iwatsubo, and M. Matsuda. Theoretical investigation of an artificial joint with micro-pocket-covered component and biphasic cartilage on the opposite articulating surface. J. Biomech. Eng. 125:425–433, 2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tienen, T. G., et al. Prosthetic replacement of the medial meniscus in cadaveric knees—Does the prosthesis mimic the functional behavior of the native meniscus? Am. J. Sports Med. 32:1182–1188, 2004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Vunjak-Novakovic, G., B. Obradovic, I. Martin, P. M. Bursac, R. Langer, and L. E. Freed. Dynamic cell seeding of polymer scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. Biotechnol. Prog. 14:193–202, 1998.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Waldman, S. D., M. D. Grynpas, R. M. Pilliar, and R. A. Kandel. The use of specific chondrocyte populations to modulate the properties of tissue-engineered cartilage. J. Orthop. Res. 21:132–138, 2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Woessner, J. F. Jr., The determination of hydroxyproline in tissue and protein samples containing small proportions of this imino acid. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 93:440–447, 1961.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wolford, L. M., D. A. Cottrell, and C. H. Henry. Temporomandibular joint reconstruction of the complex patient with the Techmedica custom-made total joint prosthesis. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 52:2–10, 1994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wolford, M. Temporomandibular joint devices: Treatment factors and outcomes. Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol. Endod. 83:143–149, 1997.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Biomedical Engineering Society 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biomedical Engineering DepartmentNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biomedical EngineeringNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations