Development of a Tri-polar Concentric Ring Electrode for Acquiring Accurate Laplacian Body Surface Potentials

W. Besio; R. Aakula; K. Koka; W. Dai

doi:10.1007/s10439-005-9054-8

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

March 2006, Volume 34, Issue 3, pp 426–435 | Cite as

Development of a Tri-polar Concentric Ring Electrode for Acquiring Accurate Laplacian Body Surface Potentials

Authors
Authors and affiliations

W. BesioEmail author
R. Aakula
K. Koka
W. Dai

Article

First Online: 16 February 2006

Received: 03 May 2005

Accepted: 23 September 2005

4 Shares
272 Downloads
34 Citations

Abstract

Potentials recorded on the body surface from the heart are of a spatial and temporal function. The 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) provides a useful means of global temporal assessment; however, it yields limited spatial information due to the smoothing effect caused by the volume conductor. In an attempt to circumvent the smoothing problem, researchers have used the five-point method (FPM) to numerically estimate the analytical solution of the Laplacian with an array of monopolar electrodes. Researchers have also developed a bipolar concentric ring electrode system to estimate the analytical Laplacian, and others have used a quasi-bipolar electrode configuration. In a search to find an electrode configuration with a close approximation to the analytical Laplacian, development of a tri-polar concentric ring electrode based on the nine-point method (NPM) was conducted. A comparison of the NPM, FPM, and discrete form of the quasi-bipolar configuration was performed over a 400 × 400 mesh with 1/400 spacing by computer modeling. Different properties of bipolar, quasi-bipolar and tri-polar concentric ring electrodes were evaluated and compared, and verified with tank experiments. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc t-test and Bonferroni corrections were performed to compare the performance of the various methods and electrode configurations. It was found that the tri-polar electrode has significantly improved accuracy and local sensitivity. This paper also discusses the development of an active sensor using the tri-polar electrode configuration. A 1-cm active Laplacian tri-polar sensor based on the NPM was tested and deemed feasible for acquiring Laplacian cardiac surface potentials.

Keywords

ECG Nine-point method Quasi-bipolar electrode Tri-polar electrode Laplacian Active sensor

This is a preview of subscription content, to check access.

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank Louisiana Tech University Center for Entrepreneurship and Information Technology, Louisiana Board of Regents (grant # LEQSF (2003–05)-RD-B-05), and the NCIIA for financial support and our lab associates and Dr. Aijun Besio for their assistance in this research and manuscript.

APPENDIX

Since the proposed quasi-bipolar electrode shown in Fig. 2 has equal interelectrode distance, the analysis of the nine-point arrangement formed by points p ₁ through p ₈ and p ₀ of Fig. 1, with the same interpoint distance, is considered. Voltages v ₀ through v ₈ are the potentials at these points. Each potential in this nine-point arrangement can be written in the form of a Taylor series expansion as explained by Huiskamp.6

The average of the outer potentials v ₅, v ₆, v ₇, and v ₈ after the Taylor series expansion becomes

$$\frac{{v_5 + v_6 + v_7 + v_8 }}{4} = v_0 + r^2 \left. {\left( {\frac{{\partial ^2 v}}{{\partial x^2 }} + \frac{{\partial ^2 v}}{{\partial y^2 }}} \right)} \right|_{p_0 }\\ +\, \frac{{r^4 }}{3}\left. {\left( {\frac{{\partial ^4 v}}{{\partial x^4 }} + \frac{{\partial ^4 v}}{{\partial y^4 }}} \right)} \right|_{p_0 } + \cdots$$

(A.1)

The average of the potentials v ₁, v ₂, v ₃, and v ₄ after the Taylor series expansion becomes

$$\frac{{v_1 + v_2 + v_3 + v_4 }}{4} = v_0 + \frac{{r^2 }}{4}\left. {\left( {\frac{{\partial ^2 v}}{{\partial x^2 }} + \frac{{\partial ^2 v}}{{\partial y^2 }}} \right)} \right|_{p_0 }\\ +\, \frac{{r^4 }}{{48}}\left. {\left( {\frac{{\partial ^4 v}}{{\partial x^4 }} + \frac{{\partial ^4 v}}{{\partial y^4 }}} \right)} \right|_{p_0 } + \cdots$$

(A.2)

Adding v ₀ to both sides of (A.1) and then dividing by 2 gives

$$\frac{{\frac{1}{4}\sum\limits_{i = 5}^8 {v_i } + v_0 }}{2} = v_0 + \frac{{r^2 }}{2}\left. {\left( {\frac{{\partial ^2 v}}{{\partial x^2 }} + \frac{{\partial ^2 v}}{{\partial y^2 }}} \right)} \right|_{p_0 }\\ +\, \frac{{r^4 }}{6}\left. {\left( {\frac{{\partial ^4 v}}{{\partial x^4 }} + \frac{{\partial ^4 v}}{{\partial y^4 }}} \right)} \right|_{p_0 } + \cdots$$

(A.3)

Subtracting (A.2) from (A.3) results in

$$\frac{1}{2}\left( {\frac{1}{4}\sum\limits_{i = 5}^8 {\mathop v\nolimits_i } + \mathop v\nolimits_0 } \right) - \frac{1}{4}\sum\limits_{j = 1}^4 {\mathop v\nolimits_j } = \frac{{\mathop r\nolimits^2 }}{4}\left. {\left( {\frac{{\mathop \partial \nolimits^2 v}}{{\partial \mathop x\nolimits^2 }} + \frac{{\mathop \partial \nolimits^2 v}}{{\partial \mathop y\nolimits^2 }}} \right)} \right|_{P0}\\ + \frac{{7\mathop r\nolimits^4 }}{{48}}\left. {\left( {\frac{{\mathop \partial \nolimits^4 v}}{{\partial \mathop x\nolimits^4 }} + \frac{{\mathop \partial \nolimits^4 v}}{{\partial \mathop y\nolimits^4 }}} \right)} \right|_{\mathop p\nolimits_0 } + \ldots$$

(A.4)

From (A.4) the approximate solution for the Laplacian of the potential at p ₀ can be estimated. Therefore, the Laplacian at p ₀ is

$$\Delta p_0 = \left. {\left( {\frac{{\partial ^2 v}}{{\partial x^2 }} + \frac{{\partial ^2 v}}{{\partial y^2 }}} \right)} \right|_{p_0 } = \frac{4}{{r^2 }}\Bigg[ {\frac{1}{2}\left( {\frac{1}{4}\sum\limits_{i = 5}^8 {v_i + v_0 } } \right)}\\ {- \frac{1}{4}\sum\limits_{j = 1}^4 {v_j }} \Bigg] + O(r^2 )\ldots$$

(A.5)

where $O(r^2 ) = \frac{2}{{r^2 }}[O(r^4 )] = \frac{{7r^2 }}{{48}}\left. {\left( {\frac{{\partial ^4 v}}{{\partial x^4 }} + \frac{{\partial ^4 v}}{{\partial v^4 }}} \right)} \right|_{_{p_0 } } + \cdots$ is the truncation error.

Equation (A.5) can also be generalized to the quasi-bipolar concentric ring electrodes, neglecting the truncation error O(r ²). By applying a similar procedure as was used for the bipolar electrode configuration, performing the integral along a circle of radius r around point p ₀ of the Taylor expansion and defining X = r sin(θ) and Y = r cos(θ)6 result in (A.6), which is the potential on the middle ring.

$$\int\nolimits_0^{2\pi } {(v(r,\theta )} d\theta = \int\nolimits_0^{2\pi } {v_0 } \,d\theta + \frac{{r^2 }}{4}2\pi \Delta v_0\\ +\, \frac{{r^4 }}{{24}}\int\nolimits_0^{2\pi } {\sum\limits_{j = 0}^4 {(\sin \theta )^{4 - j} (\cos \theta )^j d\theta \left. {\left( {\frac{{\partial ^4 v}}{{\partial x^{4 - j} \partial y^j }}} \right)} \right|_{p_0 } } }\\ +\, \frac{{(2r)^6 }}{{6!}}\int\nolimits_0^{2\pi } {\sum\limits_{j = 0}^6 {(\sin \theta )^{6 - j} (\cos \theta )^j \theta \left. {\left( {\frac{{\partial ^6 v}}{{\partial x^{6 - j} \partial y^j }}} \right)} \right|_{p_0 } } }\\ +\, \cdots \cdots$$

(A.6)

Similarly performing the integral along a circle of radius 2r around p ₀ and defining X = 2r sin(θ) and Y = 2r cos(θ)6 result in (A.7), which is the potential on the outer ring.

$$\int\limits_0^{2\pi } {v(2r,\theta )} d\theta = \int\nolimits_0^{2\pi } {v_0 } d\theta + r^2 2\pi \Delta v_0\\ +\, \frac{{2r^4 }}{3}\int\nolimits_0^{2\pi } {\sum\limits_{j = 0}^4 {(\sin \theta )^{4 - j} (\cos \theta )^j d\theta \left. {\left( {\frac{{\partial ^4 v}}{{\partial x^{4 - j} \partial y^j }}} \right)} \right|_{p_0 } } }\\ +\, \frac{{(2r)^6 }}{{6!}}\int\nolimits_0^{2\pi } {\sum\limits_{j = 0}^6 {(\sin \theta )^{6 - j} (\cos \theta )^j d\theta \left. {\left( {\frac{{\partial ^6 v}}{{\partial x^{6 - j} \partial y^j }}} \right)} \right|_{p_0 } } }\\ +\, \cdots$$

(A.7)

Adding the potential of the disc, $\int\nolimits_0^{2\pi } {v_0 \,d\theta }$, to both sides of (A.7) and then dividing by 2 results in the average of outer ring and center disc potentials, representing the short in the quasi-bipolar method. This results in

$$\frac{{\int\nolimits_0^{2\pi } {(v(2r,\theta ) + v_0 )} d\theta }}{2} = \int\nolimits_0^{2\pi } {v_0 \,d\theta } + r^2 \pi \Delta v_0\\ +\, \frac{{r^4 }}{3}\int\nolimits_0^{2\pi } {\sum\limits_{j = 0}^4 {(\sin \theta )^{4 - j} (\cos \theta )^j d\theta \left. {\left( {\frac{{\partial ^4 v}}{{\partial x^{4 - j} \partial y^j }}} \right)} \right|_{p_0 } } }\\ +\, \cdots$$

(A.8)

Neglecting the truncation error and subtracting Equation (A.6) from (A.8) result in a proportionate approximation (A.9) to the Laplacian at point p ₀ using the quasi-bipolar concentric ring electrode.

$$\Delta v_0 \cong \frac{4}{{r^2 }}\Bigg( {\frac{{\frac{1}{{2\pi }}\int\limits_0^{2\pi } {(v(2r,\theta ) + v_0 )} d\theta }}{2} - \frac{1}{{2\pi }}\int\nolimits_0^{2\pi } {v(r,\theta )d\theta } } \Bigg)$$

(A.9)

where $\frac{1}{{2\pi }}\int\nolimits_0^{2\pi } {v(r,\theta )\,d\theta }$ and $\frac{1}{{2\pi }}\int\nolimits_0^{2\pi } {v(2r,\theta )d\theta }$ represent the average potentials on the middle ring and outer ring, respectively.

REFERENCES

1.
Besio, W., C. C. Lu, and P. P. Tarjan. A feasibility study for body surface cardiac propagation maps of humans from Laplacian moments of activation. Electromagnetics 21:621–632, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.
Fattorusso, V., and J. Tilmant. Exploration du champ electrique precordial a l’aide de deux electrodes circulaires, concentriques et rapprochees. Arch. Mal du Coeur. 42:452–455, 1949.Google Scholar
3.
He, B., and D. Wu. Laplacian electrocardiography. Crit. Rev. BME 27(3–5):285–338, 1999.Google Scholar
4.
He, B., and R. J. Cohen. Body surface Laplacian ECG mapping. IEEE Trans. BME 39(11):1179–1191, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.
He, B., and R. J. Cohen. Body surface Laplacian mapping in man. IEEE EMBS 13(2):784–786, 1991.Google Scholar
6.
Huiskamp, G. Difference formulas for the surface Laplacian on a triangulated surface. J. Comput. Phys. 95(2):477–496, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.
Lapidus, L., and G. F. Pinder. Numerical Solution of Partial Differential Equations in Science and Engineering. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,1982, 371–372.Google Scholar
8.
Lian, J., G. Li, J. Cheng, B. Avitall, and B. He. Body surface Laplacian mapping of atrial activation in normal subjects. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 40(6):650–659, 2002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.
Li, G., J. Lian, P. Salla, J. Cheng, P. Shaw, I. Ramachandra, B. Avitall, and B. He Body surface Laplacian mapping of ventricular depolarization in normal subjects. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 14(1):16–27, 2003.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.
Lu, C. C., and P. P. Tarjan. An ultra high common mode rejection ratio (CMRR) AC instrumentation amplifier for Laplacian electrocardiographic measurements. Biomed. Instr. Tech. 76–93, Jan–Feb, 1999.Google Scholar
11.
Oosterom, A. V., and J. Strackee. Computing the lead field of electrodes with axial symmetry. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 21:473–481, 1983.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.
Ames, W. F. Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations. New York: Barnes & Noble, Inc. 1969, 15–19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

Authors and Affiliations

W. Besio
- 1
- 2
Email author
R. Aakula
- 1
K. Koka
- 1
W. Dai
- 1

1.Department of Biomedical EngineeringLouisiana Tech UniversityRustonUSA
2.RustonUSA

Development of a Tri-polar Concentric Ring Electrode for Acquiring Accurate Laplacian Body Surface Potentials

Abstract

Keywords

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

REFERENCES

Copyright information

Authors and Affiliations

Personalised recommendations

Cite article