Numerical Solution of Ocular Fluid Dynamics in a Rabbit Eye: Parametric Effects

  • Satish Kumar
  • Sumanta Acharya
  • Roger Beuerman
  • Arto Palkama
Article

Numerical calculations of the aqueous humor dynamics in the anterior chamber of a rabbit's eye are presented to delineate the basic flow mechanisms. The calculations are based on a geometrical model of the eye, which represents the Trabecular meshwork (TM) as a multilayered porous zone of specified pore sizes and void fraction. The outer surface of the cornea is assumed to be at a fixed temperature (corresponding to the ambient temperature), while the iris surface is assumed to be at the core body temperature. Results are obtained for both the horizontal upward-facing orientation of the eye, and the vertical orientation of the eye. Parameters varied include: the temperature difference between the iris and the cornea to underscore the important role of buoyancy in driving the aqueous humor flow; and, the pupil size reflecting different levels of ambient light. Buoyancy is observed to be the dominant driving mechanism for the convective motion in both orientations of the eye. Variations in the pupil size appear to have little influence on the IOP or flow distribution in view of the dominant role of buoyancy in controlling the flow motion. The study provides distributions of the shear stress and flow patterns and delineates the important role of the eye-orientation on these results.

Keywords

Aqueous humor Fluid dynamics Trabecular meshwork 

Notes

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by a grant from the Louisiana Board of Regents under a Health Excellence Support Fund program. Their support is gratefully acknowledged.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Canning, C. R., J. N. Dewynne, A. D. Fitt, and M. J. Greaney. Fluid flow in the anterior chamber of a human eye. IMA J. Math. Appl. Med. Biol. 19:31–60, 2002.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Doormal, J. P., and G. D. Raithby. Enhancements of the SIMPLE method for predicting incompressible fluid flow. Numer. Heat Transf. 7:147–163, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Epstein, D. L., T. F. Freddo, P. J. Anderson, M. M. Patterson, and S. B. Chu. Experimental obstruction to aqueous outflow by pigment particles in living monkeys. Invest. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 27:387–395, 1986.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ergun, S. Fluid flow through packed columns. Chem. Eng. Prog. 48(2):89–94, 1952.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ethier, C. R., M. F. Coloma, A. W. Kater, and R. R. Allingham, Retroperfusion studies of the aqueous outflow system. Invest. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 34:(2):385–394, 1992.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ethier, C. R., R. D. Kamm, M. Johnson, A. F. Pavoo, and P. J. Anderson, Further studies on the flow of aqueous humor through microporous filters. Invest. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 30:739–746, 1989.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ethier, C. R., R. D. Kamm, B. A. Palaszewski, M. C. Johnson, and T. M. Richardson. Calculations of flow resistance in the juxtacanalicular meshwork. Invest. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 27:1741–1750, 1986.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gerlach, J. C., G. Hentschel, K. Zeilinger, M. D. Smith, and P. Neuhas. Cell detachment during sinusoidal reperfusion after liver preservation, in vitro model. Transplantation 64:907–912, 1997.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grant, W. M., Experimental aqueous perfusion in enucleated human eyes. Arch. Ophthalmol. 69(6):783–801, 1963.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heys, J. J., and V. H. Barocas. Computaional evaluation of the role of accommodation in pigmentary glaucoma. Invest. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 43:700–708, 2002.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Heys, J. J., and V. H. Barocas. A boussinesq model of natural convection in the human eye and the formation of Krukenberg's spindle. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 30:392–401, 2002.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heys, J. J., V. H. Barocas, and M. J. Taravella. Modeling passive mechanical interaction between aqueous humor and iris. J. Biomech. Eng. 123:540–546, 2001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huillier, J. P., and G. A. Sbirlea, T. B. Martonen. Morphology of the human eye: Glaucoma physiology and laser iridectomy. In: Medical Applications of Computer Modelling: Cardiovascular and Ocular Systems, edited by WIT, United Kingdom, pp. 225–242, 2000.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Johnson, M. C., and R. D. Kamm. The role of Schlemm's canal in aqueous outflow from the human eye. Invest. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 24:320–325, 1983.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Johnson, M. C., R. D. Kamm, W. M. Grant, D. L. Epstein, and D. Gasterland. The flow of aqueous humor through micro-porous filters. Invest. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 27:92–97, 1986.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. Johnson, A. Shaprio, C. R. Ethier, and R. D. Kamm. Modulation of outflow resistance by the pores of the inner wall endothelium. Invest. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 33:1670–1675, 1992.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kocak, I., S. Orgul, and J. Flammer. Variability in the measurement of corneal temperature using a non-contact infrared thermometer. Ophthalmologica 213(6):345–349, 1999.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lindenmayer, J. M., M. G. Kahn, E. Hertzman, and D. L. Epstein. Morphology and function of the aqueous outflow system in monkey eyes perfused with sulfhydryl agents. Invest. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 24:710, 1983.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lehto, I., P. Ruusuvaara, and K. Setala. Corneal endothelim in pigmentary glaucoma and pigment dispersion syndrome. Ophthalmologica 68:703–709, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mallinson, G. D., and G. D. V. Davis. Three-dimensional natural convection in a box: A numerical study. J. Fluid Mech. 83(1):1–31, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McEwen, W., Application of Poiseuilles's law to aqueous outflow. Arch. Ophthalmol. 60(2):290–294, 1958.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Mclaren, J. W., S. D. Trocme, S. Relf, and R. F. Brubaker. Rate of flow of aqueous humor determined from measurements of aqueous flare. Invest. Opthalmol. Vis. Sci. 31(2):339–346, 1990.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Mori, A., Y. Oguchi, Y. Okusawa, M. Ono, H. Fyhusguna, and K. Tsubota. Fujishima, and use of high-speed, high-resolution thermography to evaluate the tear film layer. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 124:729–735, 1997.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mullenax, C. A., “Doctoral Research Prospectus,” available at (http://www.studentweb.Tulane.edu/~cmullen/documents.html), pp. 6.
  25. 25.
    Okuno, T. Thermal effect of infra-red radiation on the eye: A study based on a model. Ann. Ocuup. Hyg. 35:1–12, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Palkama, A., and R. Beureman. Ocular fluid dynamics measured with vivo confocal microscopy and microbeads. Ophthalmology, 2001.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Scott, J. A. The computation of temperature rises in the human eye induced by infrared radiation. Phys. Med. Biol. 33:243–257, 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Scott, J. A., A finite element model of heat transport in the human eye. Phys. Med. Biol. 33:227–241, 1988.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tripathi, R. C., and B. J. Tripathi. Anatomy of the Human Eye, Orbit, and Adnexa. In: The Eye, Vol. 1a, Vegetative Physiology and Biochemistry, edited by Hugh Davson. New York: Academic, pp. 1–268, 1984.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yedder, R. B., and E. Bilgen. Laminar natural convection in inclined enclosures bounded by a solid wall. Heat Mass Transf. 32:455–462, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Satish Kumar
    • 1
  • Sumanta Acharya
    • 1
    • 3
  • Roger Beuerman
    • 2
  • Arto Palkama
    • 2
  1. 1.Mechanical EngineeringLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA
  2. 2.Department of Ophthalmology, LSU Eye CenterNew OrleansUSA
  3. 3.Mechanical EngineeringLouisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations