Advertisement

Annals of Biomedical Engineering

, Volume 34, Issue 2, pp 232–238 | Cite as

Undergraduate Biomedical Imaging Education

  • Cynthia B. PaschalEmail author
  • Kathy R. Nightingale
  • Kristina M. Ropella
Whitaker Foundation White Paper
  • 143 Downloads

INTRODUCTION

Biomedical engineers, with their training in the life sciences as well as engineering, mathematics and physical sciences, are uniquely poised to both support and advance biomedical imaging technologies, which noninvasively capture the structure and function of living organisms. Biomedical imaging, born of Roentgen's 1895 discovery of X-rays, now incorporates a wide variety of modalities that produce images reflecting the distribution and interaction of energy with the body's tissues. Such images are acquired and used in many different ways including traditional medical imaging for diagnosis, therapy planning and assessment. Biomedical engineers also acquire and use images in the forms of standard videos to study gait analysis, endoscopic videos to guide therapeutic interventions, and still camera optical images to quantify biometrics and to read DNA microarrays. Strong undergraduate imaging curricula are critical to developing the essential human infrastructure needed to...

Keywords

Single Photon Emission Compute Tomography Point Spread Function Modulation Transfer Function Biomedical Engineering Biomedical Imaging 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Bransford, J., A. Brown, and R. Cockings (Eds.). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000 (also http://www.nap.edu/html/howpeople1/).
  2. 2.
    Budinger, T. F. Biological and Biomedical Imaging. The Whitaker Foundation Biomedcial Engineeering Summit, 2000, http://summit.whitaker.org/white/imaging.html.
  3. 3.
    DeLuca, P. M., M. M. Goodsitt, and W. R. Hendee Point/Counterpoint: Educational programs for imaging physicists should emphasize the science of imaging rather than the technology of imaging. Med. Phys. 31(10):2727–2729, 2004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jan, S., G. Santin, D. Strul, S. Staelens, K. Assie, D. Autret, S. Avner, R. Barbier, M. Bardies, P. M. Bloomfield, D. Brasse, V. Breton, P. Bruyndnckx, I. Buvat, A. F. Chatziioannou, Y. Choi, Y. H. Chung, C. Comtat, D. Dnnarieix, L. Ferrer, S. J. Glick, C J. Groselle, D. Guez, P.-F. Hnore, S. Kerhoas-Cavata, A. S. Kirov, V. Kohli, M. Koole, M. Krieguer, D. J. va der Laan, F. lamare, G. Largeron, C. Lartizie, D. Lazaro, M. C. Maas, L. Maigne, F. Mayet, F. Melot, C. Merheb, E. Pennacchio, J. Perez, U. Pietrzyk, F. R. Rannou, M. Rey, D. R. Schaart, C. R. Schmidtlein, L. Simon, T. Y. Sng, J.-M. Vieira, D. Visviki, R. Van deWalle, E. Wieers and C. Morel. GATE: A simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT. Phys. Med. Biol. 49(19):4543–4561, 2004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nguyen, J. D., and C. B. Paschal. Development of online ultrasound instructional module and comparison to traditional teaching methods. J. Eng. Educ. 91(3):275–283, 2002.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paschal, C. B. The need for effective biomedical imaging education. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Mag. 22(4):88–91, 2003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Paschal, C. B., S. P. Brophy, and S. S. Klein. A comparison of active lecture vs. hands-on learning of magnification and penumbra in X-ray imaging. In: Biomedical Engineering Society Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, PA, October 2004.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schwartz, D., S. Brophy, X. Lin, and J. Bransford. Software for managing complex learning: Examples from an educational psychology course. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 47(2):39–59, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shevin, R., R. J. Zambon, S. S. Klein, and C. B. Paschal. Safe alternatives for hands on learning of X-ray imaging principles (conference paper). In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference and Exposition of the American Society for Engineering Education, Session 2209, Nashville, TN, June 2003, pp. 133–140.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sprawls, P. Web-based resources for Imaging physics and technology education. Med. Phys. 31(6):1793–1794, 2004.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sprawls, P. Physics of medical imaging open education resources. Med. Phys. 29(6):1276–1276, 2002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cynthia B. Paschal
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 6
    Email author
  • Kathy R. Nightingale
    • 4
  • Kristina M. Ropella
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of EngineeringVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Radiology and Radiological SciencesVanderbilt University School of MedicineNashvilleUSA
  3. 3.Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging ScienceNashvilleUSA
  4. 4.Department of Biomedical EngineeringDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  5. 5.Department of Biomedical EngineeringMarquette UniversityMilwaukeeUSA
  6. 6.Vanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations