Laser Printing of Single Cells: Statistical Analysis, Cell Viability, and Stress
- 790 Downloads
- 99 Citations
Abstract
Methods to print patterns of mammalian cells to various substrates with high resolution offer unique possibilities to contribute to a wide range of fields including tissue engineering, cell separation, and functional genomics. This manuscript details experiments demonstrating that BioLP TM Biological Laser Printing, can be used to rapidly and accurately print patterns of single cells in a noncontact manner. Human osteosarcoma cells were deposited into a biopolymer matrix, and after 6 days of incubation, the printed cells are shown to be 100% viable. Printing low numbers of cells per spot by BioLPTM is shown to follow a Poisson distribution, indicating that the reproducibility for the number of cells per spot is therefore determined not by the variance in printed volume per drop but by random sampling statistics. Potential cell damage during the laser printing process is also investigated via immunocytochemical studies that demonstrate minimal expression of heat shock proteins by printed cells. Overall, we find that BioLPTM is able to print patterns of osteosarcoma cells with high viability, little to no heat or shear damage to the cells, and at the ultimate single cell resolution.
Keywords
BioLPTM Laser-induced forward transfer Tissue engineering Cell separation Cell seedingPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Azuma, N., N. Akasaka, H. Kito, M. Ikeda, V. Gahtan, T. Sasjima, and B. E. Sumpio. Role of p38 MAP kinase in endothelial cell alignment induced by fluid shear stress. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 280:H189–H197, 2001.Google Scholar
- 2.Bancroft, G. N., V. I. Sikavitsas, J. V. D. Dolder, T. L. Sheffield, C. G. Ambrose, J. A. Jansen, and A. G. Mikos. Fluid flow increases mineralization matrix deposition in 3D perfusion culture of marrow stromal osteoblasts in a dose-dependent manner Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 99:12600–12604, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Barron, J. A., P. K. Wu, H. D. Ladouceur, and B. R. Ringeisen. Biological laser printing: A novel technique for creating heterogeneous three-dimensional cell patterns Biomed. Microdev. 6:139–147, 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Barron, J. A., B. J. Spargo, and B. R. Ringeisen. Biological laser printing of three-dimensional cellular structures. App. Phys. A 79:1027–1030, 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Barron, J. A., R. Rosen, J. Jones-Meehan, B. J. Spargo, S. Belkin, and B. R. Ringeisen. Biological laser printing of genetically modified Escherichia coli for biosensor applications. Biosens. Bioelectr. 20:246–252, 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Buican, T. N., M. J. Smyth, H. A. Crissman, G. C. Salzman, C. C. Stewart, and J. C. Martin. Automated single-cell manipulation and sorting by light trapping. App. Optics 26:5311–5316, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Chrisey, D. B., R. A. McGill, J. S. Horwitz, A. Pique, B. R. Ringeisen, D. M. Bubb, and P. K. Wu. Laser deposition of polymer and biomaterial films. Chem. Rev. 103:553–576, 2003. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Darzynkiewicz, Z., E. Bedner, X. Li, W. Gorczyca, and M. R. Melamed. Laser-scanning cytometry: A new instrumentation with many applications. Exp. Cell Res. 249:1–12, 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Davey, H. M., and D. B. Kell. Flow cytometry and cell sorting of heterogeneous microbial populations: The importance of single-cell analyses. Microbiol. Rev. 60:641–661, 1996.Google Scholar
- 10.Freed, L. E., and G. Vunjak-Novakovic. Tissue culture bioreactors: Chondrogenesis as a model system. In: Principles of Tissue Engineering, edited by R. P. Lanza, W. Chick, and R. Langer. Austin: Landes, 1997, pp. 151–165.Google Scholar
- 11.Grover, S. C., A. G. Skirtach, R. C. Gauthier, and C. P. Grover. Automated single-cell sorting system based on optical trapping. J. Biomed. Optics 6:14–22, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Ikeda, K., V. P. Michelangeli, T. J. Martin, and D. M. Findlay. Type-I collagen substrate increases calcitonin and parathyroid-hormone receptor-mediated signal-transduction in UMR 106-06 osteoblast-like cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 156:130–137, 1993.Google Scholar
- 13.Jager, E. W. H., C. Immerstrand, K. H. Peterson, K. E. Magnusson, I. Lundstrom, and O. Inganas. The cell clinic: Closable microvials for single cell studies. Biomed. Micro. 4:177–187, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Jakab, K., A. Neagu, V. Mironov, R. R. Markwald, and G. Forgacs. Engineering biological structures of prescribed shape using self-assembling multicellular systems. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 101:2864–2869, 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Karaiskou, A., I. Zergioti, C. Fotakis, M. Kapsetaki, and D. Kafetzopoulos. Microfabrication of biomaterials by the sub-ps laser-induced forward transfer process. Appl. Surf. Sci. 208–209:245–249, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Kasili, R. M., B. M. Cullum, G. D. Griffin, and T. Vo-Dinh. Nanosensor for in vivo measurement of the carcinogen benzo[a]pyrene in a single cell. J. Nanosci. Nanotech. 2:653–658, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Katsuragi, T., and Y. Tani. Single-cell sorting of microorganisms by flow or slide-based (including laser scanning) cytometry. Acta Biotechnol. 21:99–115, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Langer, R., and J. P. Vacanti. Tissue engineering. Science 260:920, 1993.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Mather, J. P., and P. E. Roberts. Introduction to Cell and Tissue Culture. New York: Plenum Press, 1998, pp. 66–70.Google Scholar
- 20.Meyer, S. L. Data Analysis for Scientists and Engineers. New York: Wiley, 1975, pp. 202–222.Google Scholar
- 21.Mironov, V., T. Boland, T. Trusk, G. Forgacs, and R. R. Markwald. Organ printing: Computer-aided jet-based 3D tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol. 21:157–161, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Müller, T., G. Gradl, S. Howitz, S. Shirley, T. Schnelle, and G. Fuhr. A 3-D microelectrode system for handling and caging single cells and particles. Biosens. Bioelectron. 14:247–256, 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Nerem, R. M. Cellular engineering. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 19:529, 1991.Google Scholar
- 24.Nishizuka, S., L. Charboneau, L. Young, S. Major, W. C. Renhold, M. Waltham, H. Kouros-Mehr, K. J. Bussey, J. K. Lee, V. Espina, P. J. Munson, E. Petricoin III, L. A. Liotta, and J. N. Weinstein. Proteomic profiling of the NCI-60 cancer cell lines using new high-density reverse-phase lysate microarrays. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 100:14229–14234, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Odde, D. J., and M. J. Renn. Laser-guided direct writing for applications in biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 17:385–389, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Oishi, Y., K. Taniguchi, H. Matsumoto, A. Ishihara, Y. Ohira, and R. R. Roy. Differential responses of HSPs to heat stress in slow and fast regions of rat gastrocnemius muscle. Muscle Nerve 28:587–94, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Reichle, C., K. Sparbier, T. Müller, T. Schnelle, P. Walden, and G. Fuhr. Combined laser tweezers and dielectric field cage for the analysis of receptor-ligand interactions on single cells. Electrophoresis, 22:272–282, 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Ringeisen, B. R., D. B. Chrisey, A. Piqué, R. Modi, D. Young, M. Bucaro, J. Jones-Meehan, and B. J. Spargo. Generation of mesoscopic patterns of viable Escherichia coli by ambient laser transfer. Biomaterials 23:161–166, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Ringeisen, B. R., H. Kim, J. A. Barron, D. B. Krizman, D. B. Chrisey, S. Jackman, R. Y. C. Auyeung, and B. J. Spargo. Laser printing of pluripotent embryonal carcinoma cells. Tissue Eng. 10: 483–491, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 30.Ringeisen, B. R., P. K. Wu, H. Kim, A. Piqué, R. Y. C. Auyeung, D. Young, D. B. Chrisey, and D. B. Krizman. Picoliter-scale protein microarrays by laser direct write. Biotech. Prog. 18:1126–1129, 2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Rudensky, B., E. Paz, G. Altarescu, D. Raveh, E. Elstein, and A. Zimran. Fluorescent flow cytometric assay: A new diagnostic tool for measuring beta-glucocerebrosidase activity in Gaucher disease. Blood Cell Mol. Dis. 1:97–99, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Shapiro, H. H. Practical Flow Cytometry. New York: Wiley-Liss, 1995.Google Scholar
- 33.Tazi, K. A., E. Barriere, R. Moreau, J. Heller, P. Sogni, D. Pateron, O. Poirel, and D. Lebrec. Role of shear stress in aortic eNOS up-regulation in rats with biliary cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 122:1869–1877, 2002Google Scholar
- 34.Weaver, J. L. Introduction to flow cytometry. Methods 21:199–201, 2000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Wu, P. K., B. R. Ringeisen, J. Callahan, M. Brooks, D. M. Bubb, H. D. Young, A. Piqué, B. J. Spargo, R. A. McGill, and D. B. Chrisey. The deposition, structure, pattern deposition, and activity of biomaterial thin-films by matrix-assisted pulsed-laser evaporation (MAPLE) and MAPLE direct write. Thin Solid Films 398:607, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Wu, P. K., B. R. Ringeisen, D. B. Krizman, S. M. Hewitt, C. G. Frondoza, M. Brooks, D. M. Bubb, R. C. Y. Auyeung, H. Kim, A. Pique, J. M. Fitz-Gerald, B. J. Spargo, R. A. McGill, and D. B. Chrisey. Laser transfer of biomaterials: Matrix-assisted pulsed laser evaporation (MAPLE) and MAPLE Direct Write. Rev. Sci. Instr. 74:2546–2557, 2003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 37.Yoshida, S., E. Shimizu, T. Ogura, M. Takada, and S. Sone. Stimulatory effect of reconstituted basement membrane components (Matrigel) on the colony formation of a panel of human l ung cancer cell lines in soft agar. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 123:301–309, 1997CrossRefGoogle Scholar