Annals of Biomedical Engineering

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 95–103 | Cite as

Fluid Shifts Due to Microgravity and Their Effects on Bone: A Review of Current Knowledge



Bone loss during long-term space flight is potentially a significant problem. Bone mineral density measurements show that bone is lost at a rate of about 1% per month from the lumbar spine, and 1.5% per month from the hip. Bone density changes are not uniform throughout the skeleton, and there is accumulating evidence that the distribution of bone density changes may be related to fluid shifts observed in microgravity. The paper summarises the data relating fluid shift of bone density changes in microgravity. In addition, microgravity and ground-based experiment were carried out to investigate the effects of interstitial fluid flow on bone formation. Data from these experiments were interpreted in light of the review data relating fluid shift to bone density changes in microgravity. Both experiments assessed the effect of an external pneumatic venous tourniquet on bone distal to the tourniquet. In the first experiment, a pneumatic tourniquet was designed to be placed around one ankle of a single astronaut on a 180-day mission on the MIR space station. Ultrasound measurements of both calcanei were made during the mission, and dual energy x-ray densitometry (x-ray absorption) measurements were performed at the start and end of the mission. In the second experiment, ground-based experiments have been performed to investigate possible mechanisms for the action of such a tourniquet on bone. A venous tourniquet was designed to be placed around the hind limb of a rat, proximal to the knee, applying a continuous pressure of 30 mmHg. The tourniquet increased significantly tibial fluid weight, periosteal bone formation and intracortical bone remodelling. Some of the effects appeared to due to a nitric oxide dependant pathway. It is proposed that tissue fluid pressures have an effect on bone that is independent of mechanical load, which may explain the variation in bone mineral density observed in space flight.

Bone loss Bone fluid flow Migrogravity Lumbar spine X-ray densitometry 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Arnett, T. R., D. C. Gibbons, J. C. Utting I. R. Orris, A. Hoebertz, M. Rosendaal, S. Meghji. Hypoxia is a major stimulator of osteoclast formation and bone resorption. J. Cell. Physiol. 196:2–8, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bergula, A. P., W. Huang, and J. A. Frangos. Femoral vein ligation increases bone mass in the hind limb suspended rat. Bone 24:171–177, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fluckey, J. D., E. E. Dupont-Versteegden, D. C. Montague, M. Knox, P. Tesch, C. A. Peterson, and D. Gaddy-Kurten. A rat resistance exercise regimen attenuates losses of musculoskeletal mass during hindlimb suspension. Acta Physiol. Scand. 176:293–300, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goodship, A. E., J. L. Cunningham, V. Oganov, J. Darling, A. W. Miles, and A. W. Owen. Bone loss during long term space flight is prevented by the application of a short term impulseive mechanical stimulus. Acta Astronaut 43:65–75, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hillsley, M. V., and J. A. Frangos. Osteoblast hydraulic conductivity is regulated by calcitonin and parathyroid hormone. J. Bone Miner. Res. 11:114–124, 1996.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kelly, P. J., and J. T. Bronk. Venous pressure and bone formation. Microvasc. Res. 39:364–375, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Knothe Tate, M. L., P. Niederer, and U. Knothe. In vivo tracer transport through the lacunocanalicular system of rat bone in an environment devoid of mechanical loading. Bone 22:107–117, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kruse, R. L., and P. J. Kelly. Acceleration of fracture healing distal to a venous tourniquet. J. Bone Joint Surg. 56-A:750–759, 1974.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lang, T., A. LeBlanc, H. Evans, Y. Lu, H. Genant, and A. Yu. Cortical and trabecular bone mineral loss from the spine and hip in long-duration spaceflight. J. Bone Miner. Res. 19:1006–1015, 2004.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leblanc, A., V. Schneider, H. J. Evans, D. A. Engelbretson, and J. M. Krebs. Bone mineral loss and recovery after 17 weeks of bed rest. J. Bone Miner. Res. 5:843–850, 1990.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McCarthy, I. D., and S. P. F. Hughes. Inhibition of bone cell metabolism increases strontium 85 uptake. Calc. Tiss. Int. 39:386–389, 1986.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    McCarthy, I. D. Kinetics of albumin uptake in cortical bone and marrow. Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res. 324:24–29, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McCarthy, I., A. Goodship, R. Herzog, V. Oganov, E. Stuessi, and M. Vahlensieck. Investigation of bone changes in microgravity during long and short duration space flight: Comparison of techniques. Eur. J. Clin. Invest. 30:1–12, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Morey-Holton, E. R., and R. K. Globus. Hindlimb unloading rodent model: Technical aspects. J. Appl. Physiol. 92:1367–1377, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nitric Oxide in Bone and Joint Disease edited by Hukkanen, M. V. J., J. M. Polak, and S. P. F. Hughes. Cambridge: Cambrudge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Parfitt, A. M., M. K. Drezner, F. H. Glorieux J. P. Kannis, H. Malluche, P. J. Meunio, S. M. Ott, R. R. Recker. Bone histomorphometry: Standardisation of nomenclature, symbols and units. J. Bone Miner. Res. 2:595–610, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reich, K. M., C. V. Gay, and J. A. Frangos. Fluid shear stress as a mediator of osteoblast cyclic adenosine monophosphate production. J. Cell. Physiol. 143:100–104, 1990.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Roer, R. D., and R. M. Dillaman. Bone growth and calcium balance during simulated weightlessness in the rat. J. Appl. Physiol. 68:13–20, 1990.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roer, R. D., and R. M. Dillaman. Decreased femoral arterial flow during simulated microgravity in the rat. J. Appl. Physiol. 76:2125–2129, 1994.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rubin, C. T., and L. Lanyon. Static vs dynamic loads as an influence on bone remodelling. J. Biomech. 17:897–905, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tami, A. E., M. B. Schaffler, and M. L. Knothe Tate. Probing the tissue to subcellular level structure underlying bone’s molecular sieving function. Biorheology 40:577–590, 2003.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Turner, C. H., Y. Takano, I. Owan, and G. A. C. Murrell. Nitric oxide inhibitor L-NAME suppresses mechanically induced bone formation in rats. Am. J. Physiol. 270:E634–E639, 1996.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang, L., S. P. Fritton, S. Weinbaum, and S. C. Cowin. On bone adaptation to venous stasis. J. Biomech. 36:1439–51. 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Welch, R. D., M. J. Waldron, D. A. Hulse, C. E. Johnston, and B. M. Hargis. Intraosseous infusion using the Osteoport implant in the caprine tibia. J. Orth. Res. 10:789–799, 1992.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Welch, R. D., C. E. Johnston, M. J. Waldron, and B. Poteet. Bone changes associated with intraosseous hypertension in the caprine tibia. J. Bone Joint Surg. 75-A:53–60, 1993.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wolff, J. Das Gesetz der transformation der knocken. Translated as: The law of Bone Remodelling. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1986.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    You, L., S. C. Cowin, M. B. Schaffler, and S. Weinbaum. A model for strain amplification in the actin cytoskeleton of osteocytes due to fluid drag on pericellular matrix. J. Biomech. 34:1375–1386,2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Biomedical Engineering Society 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Biomechanics and Biomaterials Laboratory, Department of OrthopedicsLund University HospitalLundSweden
  2. 2.Biomechanics and Biomaterials Laboratory, Department of OrthopedicsLund University HospitalLundSweden

Personalised recommendations