The use of liposomes for detection of the surface lipopolysaccharide antigen, Vibrio cholerae cells, and antibodies against them
- 29 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
A test system for determination of Vibrio cholerae cells, surface O-antigen, and antibodies against them was developed on the basis of complement-dependent lysis of liposomes sensitized by the lipopolysaccharide antigen from Vibrio cholerae 569B. The factors that affect the function of the liposomal reagent were studied, and the conditions for detecting antibodies and antigenic material were optimized. This system is highly specific and sensitive to use for the determination of anticholeraic antibodies (30–50 times as effective as agglutination tests), lipopolysaccharide antigen (100 ng/ml, which corresponded to 3.0 ng of lipopolysaccharide in the sample studied), and Vibrio cholerae cells (3.3 × 107 m.b./ml, which corresponded to 106 m.b. in sample). It takes 30–40 min to detect the lipopolysaccharide antigen and antibodies and 90 min to detect V. cholerae cells.
Keywords
Vibrio Agglutination Test Antigenic Material Cholerae Cell Lipopolysaccharide AntigenPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
REFERENCES
- 1.Skopinskaya, S.N. and Yarkov, S.P., Immunologiya, 1996, no. 2, pp. 6–12.Google Scholar
- 2.Rongen, H.A.H., Bult, A., and van Bennekom, W.P., J. Immunol. Methods, 1997, vol. 204, pp. 105–133.Google Scholar
- 3.Barenholz, Y. and Crommtlin, D.J.A., in Encyclopedia of Pharmaceutical Technology, Swarbrick, J. and Boylan, J.C., Eds., New York, 1994, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
- 4.Sarkar, D.P., Das M.K., Indian J. Biochem. Biophys., 1984, vol. 21, pp. 155–157.Google Scholar
- 5.Szoka, F. and Papahadjopoulos, D., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA, 1978, vol. 75, no.9, pp. 4194–4198.Google Scholar
- 6.Skopinskaya, S.N., Yarkov, S.P., and Rubtsov, I.V., Zh. Mikrobiol. Epidemiol. Immunobiol., 1990, no. 4, pp. 84–88.Google Scholar
- 7.Skopinskaya, S.N., Tamulevich, Ya.A., Yarkov, S.P., Zlobin, V.N., and Kalinin, Yu.T., Zh. Mikrobiol. Epidemiol. Immunobiol., 1993, no. 1, pp. 77–82.Google Scholar
- 8.Ohsawata, T., Miura, H., and Harada, K., Chem. Pharm. Bull., 1985, vol. 33, no.9, pp. 3945–3952.Google Scholar
- 9.Vaskovsky, V.E., Kostetsky, E.Y., and Vasendin, I.M., J. Chromatograph., 1975, vol. 114, pp. 129–141.Google Scholar
- 10.Knirel’, Yu.A. and Kochetkov, N.K., Biokhimiya (Moscow) 1993, vol. 58, no.2, pp. 166–201.Google Scholar
- 11.Godfroid, F., Taminian, D., and Danese, J., Infect. Immunol., 1998, vol. 66, no.11, pp. 5485–5493.Google Scholar
- 12.Rosenquist, E. and Vistnes, A.I., J. Immunol. Methods, 1977, vol. 15, pp. 147–155.Google Scholar
- 13.Umezawa, Y., Sofue, S., and Tokamoto, Y., Talanta, 1984, vol. 31, no.5, pp. 375–378.Google Scholar
- 14.Vistnes, A.I., Rosenquist, E., and Froholm, L.O., J. Clin. Microbiol., 1983, vol. 18, no.4, pp. 905–911.Google Scholar
- 15.Vlasov, G.S., Torchilin, V.P., Gremyakova, T.A., and Ivanov, N.N., Zh. Mikrobiol. Epidemiol. Immunol., 1985, no. 8, pp. 87–91.Google Scholar
- 16.Legros, F., Castillo, M., Praet, M., and Vandenbranden, M., J. Immunol. Methods, 1988, vol. 108, pp. 223–230.Google Scholar
- 17.Kataoka, T., Inoue, K., Luderitz, O., and Kinsky, S.C., Eur. J. Biochem., 1971, vol. 21, pp. 80–85.Google Scholar