Advertisement

Taphonomy and Behaviour at the Acheulean Site of Kariandusi, Kenya

  • Ceri Shipton
Original Article

Abstract

In this article, Louis Leakey’s previously unpublished field reports are used to describe the 1929–1931 excavation campaign at the Acheulean site of Kariandusi. Using the sample of artefacts from this campaign housed in the Pitt Rivers Museum, Oxford University, I attempt to understand the natural and behavioural factors contributing to site formation at Kariandusi. The matrix adhering to the artefacts and the degree of rounding on the artefacts are used to assess the depositional environments at the site. The artefact types represented at the site are used to reconstruct hominin discard behaviour. Descriptions and measurements of the bifaces are used to determine how these tools were made and whether they were resharpened. In conclusion, I provide a model of the life history of a Kariandusi biface.

Keywords

Acheulean Taphonomy Biface Discard behaviour Resharpening 

Résumé

Dans cet article, je m’appuie sur des rapports non publiés de Louis Leakey pour décrire la campagne de fouille de 1929–1931 au site Acheuléen de Kariandusi. En utilisant un échantillon d’objets provenant de cette fouille et entreposé au Pitt Rivers Museum à l’université d’Oxford, j’essaie d’élucider les facteurs naturels et comportementaux qui ont contribué à la formation du site. Le sédiment résiduel adhérant aux artefacts et le degrée d’arrondissement des objets sont employés afin d’évaluer les environnements dépositionnels au niveau du site. Les types d’artefacts sont utilisés pour reconstruire les pratiques de rejet des hominins. La description des bifaces et les mesures prises sur ces objets sont employées pour déterminer comment ces outils ont été faits et s’ils ont été réaiguisés. Enfin, je conclus en offrant un modèle du cycle de vie d’un biface de Kariandusi.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author wishes to thank Dan Hicks, Alice Stevenson and Jeremy Coote for the opportunity to conduct this research. The Boise Fund is gratefully acknowledged for financial support. Thank you to Alice Stevenson for guidance and help with all aspects of this work, and to Matt Nicholas for accessing the artefact collections and taking the photographs of the Pitt Rivers artefacts. Thanks to Imogen Gunn for accessing Louis Leakey’s field reports and to Anne Taylor for access to the Cambridge artefact collections. Thank you to Stephen Lycett and Adria LaViolette for constructive comments on a draft of this manuscript. Thanks to Hannah Shipton for help with the French translation and to Vivien Kersey for proof-reading. Thanks to Kate Connell for the invitation to present this work and for the helpful feedback from the Palaeolithic-Mesolithic Discussion Group at the University of Cambridge.

References

  1. Binford, L. R. (1987). Searching for camps and missing the evidence? Another look at the lower palaeolithic. In O. Soffer (Ed.), The Pleistocene Old World, regional perspectives (pp. 17–31). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blumenschine, R. J., & Peters, C. R. (1998). Archaeological predictions for hominid land use in the paleo-Olduvai Basin, Tanzania, during lowermost Bed II times. Journal of Human Evolution, 34, 565–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bramble, D. M., & Lieberman, D. E. (2004). Endurance running and the evolution of Homo. Nature, 432, 345–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cole, S. (1954). The prehistory of East Africa. American Anthropology, 56, 1026–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Copeland, L., & Hours, F. (Eds.). (1989). The hammer on the rock: studies in the early Palaeolithic of Azraq, Jordan. British Archaeological Review.Google Scholar
  6. Deino, A., Trauth, M.H., Bergner, A.G. and Potts, R. (2004).40Ar/39Ar age calibration of the lacustrine sediments at Kariandusi, Central Kenya Rift. Paper presented at the American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2004.Google Scholar
  7. Evernden, J. F., & Curtis, G. H. (1965). The potassium-argon dating of late Cenozoic rocks in East Africa and Italy. Current Anthropology, 6, 343–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Foley, R. A. (1997). Humans before humanity. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  9. Franciscus, R. G., & Trinkhaus, E. (1988). Nasal morphology and the emergence of Homo erectus. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 75, 517–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goren-Inbar, N., & Saragusti, I. (1996). An Acheulian bifacial assemblage from Gesher Benot Ya’aqov: Indications of African affinities. Journal of Field Archaeology, 23, 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gowlett, J.A.J. (1979). A contribution to studies of the Acheulean in East Africa with especial referenceto Kilombe and Kariandusi. Unpublished PhD dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. Gowlett, J. A. J. (2005). Seeking the Palaeolithic individual in East Africa and Europe during the Lower–Middle Pleistocene. In C. Gamble & M. Porr (Eds.), The hominid individual in context: archaeological investigations of Lower and Middle Palaeolithic landscapes, locales and artefacts (pp. 50–67). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Gowlett, J. A. J., & Crompton, R. G. (1994). Kariandusi: Acheulean morphology and the question of allometry. The African Archaeological Review, 12, 3–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gregory, J. W. (1921). The rift valleys and geology of East Africa. London: Seeley, Service.Google Scholar
  15. Hosfield, R. (2005). Individuals among palimpsest data: Fluvial landscapes in Southern England. In C. Gamble & M. Porr (Eds.), The hominid individual in context: Archaeological investigations of Lower and Middle Palaeolithic landscapes, locales and artefacts (pp. 220–243). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Isaac, G. Ll. (1984). The archaeology of human origins: studies of the Lower Pleistocene, 1971–1981. Advances in World Archaeology, 3, 1–87.Google Scholar
  17. Korisettar, R., & Petraglia, M. D. (1993). Explorations in the Malaprabha Valley, Karnataka. Man and Environment, 18, 43–48.Google Scholar
  18. Langbroek, M. (2004). ‘Out of Africa’: an investigation into the earliest occupation of the Old World. Oxford: BAR International Series 1244.Google Scholar
  19. Leakey, L. S. B. (1931). The Stone Age cultures of Kenya colony. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Leakey, L. S. B. (1936). Stone Age Africa: an outline of prehistory in Africa. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Lycett, S. J. (2008). Acheulean variation and selection: does handaxe symmetry fit neutral expectations? Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 2640–2648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lycett, S. J. (2009). Understanding ancient hominin dispersals using artefactual data: a phylogeographic analysis of Acheulean handaxes. PLoS ONE, 4, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lycett, S. J., & von Cramon-Taubadel, N. (2008). Acheulian variability and hominin dispersals: a model-bound approach. Journal of Archaeological Science, 35, 553–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McCall, G. J. H., Baker, B. H., & Walsh, J. (1967). Later Tertiary and Quaternary sediments of the Kenya Rift Valley. In W. W. Bishop & J. D. Clark (Eds.), Background to evolution in Africa (pp. 191–220). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Merrick, H. V. M., & Brown, F. (1984). Obsidian sources and patterns of source utilization in Kenya and northern Tanzania: some initial findings. The African Archaeological Review, 2, 129–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Merrick, H. V., Brown F.H., and Nash, W.P. (1994). Use and movement of obsidian in the Early and Middle Stone Ages of Kenya and Northern Tanzania. In S. T. Childs (Ed.) Society, Culture, and Technology in Africa. MASCA 11 (supplement): 29–44.Google Scholar
  27. Moore, M. W. (2010). “Grammars of action” and stone flaking design space. In A. Nowell & I. Davidson (Eds.), Stone tools and the evolution of human cognition (pp. 13–44). Boulder: University Press of Colorado.Google Scholar
  28. Nyamweru, C. (1980). Rifts and volcanoes: a study of the East African rift system. Nairobi: Nelson.Google Scholar
  29. Paddayya, K., & Petraglia, M. (1995). Natural and cultural formation processes of the Acheulian sites of the Hunsgi-Baichbal Valleys, Karnataka. In S. Wadia, R. Korisettar, & V. S. Kale (Eds.), Memoirs of the Geological Society of India 3, Quaternary environments and geoarchaeology of India: essays in honour of Professor S. N. Rajaguru (pp. 333–351). Bangalore: Geological Society of India.Google Scholar
  30. Pappu, R. S., & Deo, S. G. (1994). Man-land relationship during Palaeolithic times in the Kaladgi Basin, Karnataka. Pune: Deccan College.Google Scholar
  31. Potts, R., Behrensmeyer, A. K., & Ditchfield, P. (1999). Palaeolandscape variation and early Pleistocene hominid activities: members 1 and 7, Olorgesailie formation, Kenya. Journal of Human Evolution, 37, 747–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ruff, C. B. (1991). Climate and body shape in hominid evolution. Journal of Human Evolution, 21, 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sampson, C. G. (1999). An Acheulian settlement pattern in the Upper Karoo region of South Africa. In S. Milliken & J. Cook (Eds.), A very remote period indeed: papers on the Palaeolithic presented to Derek Roe (pp. 28–36). Oxford: Oxbow Books.Google Scholar
  34. Shipton, C. (2008). Cognition and sociality in the Acheulean. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
  35. Solomon, J. D. (1931). The geology of the implementiferous deposits in the Nakuru and Naivasha Basins and the surrounding area in Kenya Colony. In L. S. B. Leakey (Ed.), The Stone Age cultures of Kenya colony (pp. 245–266). London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Stern, N. (1994). The implications of time-averaging for reconstructing the land-use patterns of early tool-using hominids. Journal of Human Evolution, 27, 89–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Steudel, K. L. (1995). Locomotor energetics and hominid evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology, 5, 42–48.Google Scholar
  38. Trinkhaus, E. (1987). Bodies, brawn, brains and noses: human ancestors and human predation. In M. Nitecki & D. V. Nitecki (Eds.), The evolution of human hunting (pp. 107–145). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  39. Wheeler, P. E. (1985). The evolution of bipedalism and the loss of functional body hair in hominids. Journal of Human Evolution, 14, 23–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wheeler, P. E. (1991). The thermoregulatory advantages of hominid bipedalism in open equatorial environments: the contribution of increased convective heat loss and cutaneous evaporative cooling. Journal of Human Evolution, 23, 379–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wheeler, P. E. (1993). The influence of stature and body form on hominid energy and water budgets: a comparison of Australopithecus and early Homo physiques. Journal of Human Evolution, 24, 13–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pitt Rivers MuseumUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations