Annals of Finance

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 15–48 | Cite as

Small caps in international equity portfolios: the effects of variance risk

Research Article


We show that predictable covariances between means and variances of stock returns may have a first order effect on portfolio composition. In an international asset menu that includes both European and North American small capitalization equity indices, we find that a three-state, heteroskedastic regime switching VAR model is required to provide a good fit to weekly return data and to accurately predict the dynamics in the joint density of returns. As a result of the non-linear dynamic features revealed by the data, small cap portfolios become riskier in bear markets, i.e., display negative co-skewness with other stock indices. Because of this property, a power utility investor ought to hold a well-diversified portfolio, despite the high risk premium and Sharpe ratios offered by small capitalization stocks. On the contrary, small caps command large optimal weights when the investor ignores variance risk, by incorrectly assuming joint normality of returns.


Intertemporal portfolio choice return predictability Co-skewness and co-kurtosis International portfolio diversification 

JEL Classification

G11 G15 F30 C32 G0 G1 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acharya, V., Pedersen, L.: Asset pricing with liquidity risk. J Financ Econ 77, 375–410 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ang, A., Bekaert, G.: International asset allocation with regime shifts. Rev Financ Stud 15, 1137–1187 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ang, A., Chen, J.: Asymmetric correlations of equity portfolios. J Financ Econ 63, 443–494 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barberis, N.: Investing for the long run when returns are predictable. J Financ 55, 225–264 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barone-Adesi, G., Gagliardini, P., Urga, G.: Testing asset pricing anomalies with co-skewness. J Business Econ Stat 22, 474–485 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berkowitz, J.: Testing density forecasts with applications to risk management. J Bus Econ Stat 19, 465–474 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Black, F.: Studies of stock market changes, proceedings of the american statistical association. In: Proceedings of the 1976 American Statistical Association, Business and Economical Statistics Section. Alexandria: American Statistical Association (1976)Google Scholar
  8. Bollerslev, T.: Modeling the coherence in short-run nominal exchange rates: a multivariate generalized ARCH model. Rev Econ Stat 72, 498–505 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campbell, J., Chan, Y.L., Viceira, L.: A multivariate model of strategic asset allocation. J Financ Econ 67, 41–80 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cvitanić, J., Polimenis, V., Zapatero, F.: Optimal portfolio allocation with higher moments. Ann Financ (2007, forthcoming)Google Scholar
  11. Das, S., Uppal, R.: Systemic risk and international portfolio choice. J Financ 59, 2809–2834 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davies, R.: Hypothesis testing when a nuisance parameter is present only under the alternative. Biometrika 64, 247–254 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Santis, G., Gerard, B.: International asset pricing and portfolio diversification with time-varying risk. J Financ 52, 1881–1912 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Diebold, F., Gunther, T., Tay, A.: Evaluating density forecasts. Int Econ Rev 39, 863–883 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dittmar, R.: Nonlinear pricing kernels, kurtosis preference, and evidence from the cross section of equity returns. J Financ 57, 369–403 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Engle, R.: Dynamic conditional correlation: a simple class of multivariate generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity models. J Business Econ Stat 20, 339–350 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Engle, R., Kroner, K.: Multivariate simultaneous GARCH. Econom Theory 11, 122–150 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Engle, R., Mezrich, J.: GARCH for groups. Risk 9, 36–40 (1996)Google Scholar
  19. Fenton, V., Gallant, R.: Qualitative and asymptotic performance of SNP density estimation. J Econom 74, 77–118 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garcia, R.: Asymptotic null distribution of the likelihood ratio test in Markov switching models. Int Econ Rev 39, 763–788 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guidolin, M., Nicodano, G.: Small caps in international equity portfolios: the effects of variance risk, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Working Paper 2005-075A (2006)Google Scholar
  22. Guidolin, M., Timmermann, A.: Size and value anomalies under regime switching. J Financ Econom (2008, forthcoming)Google Scholar
  23. Guidolin, M., Timmermann, A.: International asset allocation under regime switching, skew and kurtosis preferences. Rev Financ Stud (2008, forthcoming)Google Scholar
  24. Hamilton, J.: Time series analysis. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994)Google Scholar
  25. Harvey, C., Siddique, A.: Conditional skewness in asset pricing tests. J Financ 55, 1263–1295 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu, J., Longstaff, F., Pan, J.: Dynamic asset allocation with event risk. J Financ 58, 231–259 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Newey, W., McFadden, D.: Large sample estimation and hypothesis testing. In: Engle, R., McFadden, D.(eds) Handbook of Econometrics, vol. 4, pp. 2113–2245. Elsevier, New York (1994)Google Scholar
  28. Pástor, L.: Portfolio selection and asset pricing models. J Finance 55, 179–223 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Perez-Quiros, G., Timmermann, A.: Firm size and cyclical variations in stock returns. J Financ 55, 1229–1262 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Accounting and Finance GroupManchester Business School and Collegio Carlo Alberto (CeRP)ManchesterUK
  2. 2.Faculty of EconomicsUniversity of Turin and Collegio Carlo Alberto (CeRP)TurinItaly

Personalised recommendations