Annals of Finance

, Volume 4, Issue 4, pp 399–429

Pricing options in incomplete equity markets via the instantaneous Sharpe ratio

Research Article
  • 177 Downloads

Abstract

We use a continuous version of the standard deviation premium principle for pricing in incomplete equity markets by assuming that the investor issuing an unhedgeable derivative security requires compensation for this risk in the form of a pre-specified instantaneous Sharpe ratio. First, we apply our method to price options on non-traded assets for which there is a traded asset that is correlated to the non-traded asset. Our main contribution to this particular problem is to show that our seller/buyer prices are the upper/lower good deal bounds of Cochrane and Saá-Requejo (J Polit Econ 108:79–119, 2000) and of Björk and Slinko (Rev Finance 10:221–260, 2006) and to determine the analytical properties of these prices. Second, we apply our method to price options in the presence of stochastic volatility. Our main contribution to this problem is to show that the instantaneous Sharpe ratio, an integral ingredient in our methodology, is the negative of the market price of volatility risk, as defined in Fouque et al. (Derivatives in financial markets with stochastic volatility. Cambridge University Press, 2000).

Keywords

Pricing derivative securities Incomplete markets Sharpe ratio Correlated assets Stochastic volatility Non-linear partial differential equations Good deal bounds 

JEL Classification

G13 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barles G., Biton S., Bourgoing M. and Ley O. (2003). Uniqueness results for quasilinear parabolic equations through viscosity solutions’ methods. Calc Var 18: 159–179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Björk T. and Slinko I. (2006). Towards a general theory of good deal bounds. Rev Financ 10: 221–260 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheridito, P., Kupper, M.: Time-consistency of indifference prices and monetary utility functions, preprint. Princeton University (2006). Available at http://www.princeton.edu/∼dito/papers/timf.pdf
  4. Cochrane J. and Saá-Requejo J. (2000). Beyond arbitrage: Good deal asset price bounds in incomplete markets. J Polit Econ 108: 79–119 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crandall M.G., Ishii H. and Lions P.-L. (1992). User’s guide to viscosity solutions of second order partial differential equations. Bull Am Math Soc 27(1): 1–67 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davis, M.: Optimal hedging with basis risk, working paper. London: Imperial College (2000). Available at http://www.ma.ic.ac.uk/~mdavis/docs/basisrisk.pdf
  7. Föllmer H. and Schweizer M. (1991). Hedging of contingent claims under incomplete information. In: Davis, M.H.A. and Elliott, R.J. (eds) Applied Stochastic Analysis. Stochastics Monographs, vol. 5., pp 389–414. Gordon and Breach, London Google Scholar
  8. Forsyth, P., Labahn, G.: Numerical methods for controlled Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman PDEs in finance, preprint. Waterloo: University of Waterloo (2006). Available at http://www.cs.uwaterloo.ca/paforsyt/hjb.pdf
  9. Fouque J.P., Papanicolaou G. and Sircar R. (2000). Derivatives in Financial Markets with Stochastic Volatility. Cambridge University Press, New York Google Scholar
  10. Friedman A. (1975). Stochastic Differential Equations and Applications 1. Academic, New York Google Scholar
  11. Gerber, H.U.: Introduction to mathematical risk theory. Huebner Foundation Monograph 8 Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, published by Richard D. Irwin, Homewood (1979)Google Scholar
  12. Gerber H.U. and Shiu E.S.W. (1994). Option pricing by Esscher transforms (with discussions). Trans Soc Actuar 46: 99–191 Google Scholar
  13. Ilhan, A., Jonsson, M., Sircar, R.: Portfolio optimization with derivatives and indifference pricing. In: Carmona, R. (ed.) Volume on Indifference Pricing. Princeton: Princeton University Press (2004, to appear). Available at http://www.princeton.edu/∼sircar/
  14. Karatzas I. and Shreve S.E. (1991). Brownian Motion and Stochastic Calculus. Springer, New York Google Scholar
  15. Leung, T., Sircar, R.: Accounting for risk aversion, vesting, job termination risk and multiple exercises in valuation of employee stock options, preprint. Princeton: Princeton University (2006). Available at http://www.princeton.edu/∼sircar/Public/ARTICLES/ESO_utility.pdf
  16. Musiela M. and Zariphopoulou T. (2004). An example of indifference prices under exponential preferences. Financ Stoch 8: 229–239 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Royden H.L. (1968). Real Analysis. Macmillan, New York Google Scholar
  18. Schachermayer, W.: Introduction to the mathematics of financial markets. In: Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1816, pp. 111–177. Heidelberg: Springer (2000)Google Scholar
  19. Schweizer M. (2001). From actuarial to financial valuation principles. Insur Math Econ 28: 31–47 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sircar R. and Zariphopoulou T. (2005). Bounds & asymptotic approximations for utility prices when volatility is random. SIAM J Control Optim 43(4): 1328–1353 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Walter W. (1970). Differential and Integral Inequalities. Springer, New York Google Scholar
  22. Windcliff H., Wang J., Forsyth P.A. and Vetzal K.R. (2007). Hedging with a correlated asset: Solution of a nonlinear pricing PDE. J Comput Appl Math 200: 86–115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Young, V.R.: Pricing life insurance under stochastic mortality via the instantaneous Sharpe ratio. Insurance: Math Econ (2007, to appear). Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/0705.1297v1
  24. Zariphopoulou T. (2001). Stochastic control methods in asset pricing. In: Kannan, D. and Lakshmikantham, V. (eds) Handbook of Stochastic Analysis and Applications., pp 102–145. Marcel Dekker, New York Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA

Personalised recommendations