Advertisement

Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 204–208 | Cite as

Multimodality Treatment of Merkel Cell Carcinoma: Case Series and Literature Review of 1024 Cases

  • Heriberto Medina-Franco
  • Marshall M. Urist
  • John Fiveash
  • Martin J. Heslin
  • Kirby I. Bland
  • Samuel W. Beenken
Original Articles

Abstract

Background: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is an unusual and potentially aggressive cancer of the skin. There is no consensus regarding the optimal therapeutic approach, and the relative roles of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy still are controversial The aim of this study is to analyze the roles of these therapeutic options.

Methods: The medical records of 16 patients with a diagnosis of localized, primary MCC treated at the University of Alabama at Birmingham were reviewed. An extensive review of the English-language literature also was performed. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to develop the survival curves. Comparisons were made using Fisher’s exact test. Significance was defined as P < .05.

Results: MCC presented primarily in Caucasians (98.3%) with a median age of 69 years. Immunosuppressive therapy appeared to play a role in the development of this cancer. In the UAB experience, 3-year actuarial survival was 31%. The only factor significantly associated with overall survival was the stage of disease at presentation: median survivals were 97 vs. 15 months for stages I and II, respectively (log-rank, P = .02). From the literature review, adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with a reduced risk of local recurrence (P < .00001).

Conclusions: MCC is an aggressive cancer, with a high tendency for local recurrence and distant spread. Surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy appear to provide optimal local control. The role of chemotherapy remains to be defined.

Key Words:

Merkel cell carcinoma Surgery Radiotherapy Prognosis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Toker C. Trabecular carcinoma of the skin. Arch Dermatol 1972; 105: 107–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tang CK, Toker C. Trabecular carcinoma of the skin: an ultrastructural study. Cancer 1978; 42: 2311–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hoefler H, Rauch H, Kerl H. New immunohistochemical observation with diagnostic significance in cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinoma. Am J Dermatopathol 1984; 6: 525–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yiengpruksawan A, Coit DG, Thaler HT. Merkel cell carcinoma: prognosis and management. Arch Surg 1991; 126: 1514–19.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457–81.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pitale M, Sessions RB, Husain S. An analysis of prognostic factors in cutaneous neuroendocrine carcinoma. Laryngoscope 1992; 102: 244–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Allen PJ, Zhang ZF, Coit DG. Surgical management of Merkel cell carcinoma. Ann Surg 1999; 229: 97–105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meeuwissen JA, Bourne RG, Kearsley JH. The importance of postoperative radiation therapy in the treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 31: 325–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Skelton HG, Smith KJ, McCarthy WF, Lupton GP, Graham JH. Merkel cell carcinoma: analysis of clinical, histologic, and immunohistologic features of 132 cases with relation to survival. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 37: 734–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    O’Connor WJ, Roenigk RK, Brodland DG. Merkel cell carcinoma. Dermatol Surg 1997; 23: 929–33.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Penn I, First MR. Merkel’s cell carcinoma in organ recipients: report of 41 cases. Transplantation 1999; 68: 1717–21.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fenig E, Brenner B, Katz A, Rakovsky E, Hana MB, Sulkes A. The role of radiation therapy and chemotherapy in the treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma. Cancer 1997; 80: 881–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith DE, Bielamowicz S, Kagan AR, Anderson PJ, Peddada AV. Cutaneous neuroendocrine (Merkel cell) carcinoma. A report of 35 cases. Am J Clin Oncol 1995; 18: 199–203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kokoska ER, Kokoska MS, Collins BT, Stapleton DR, Wade TP. Early aggressive treatment for Merkel cell carcinoma improves outcome. Am J Surg 1997; 174: 688–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boyle F, Pendlebury S, Bell D. Further insights into the natural history and management of primary cutaneous neuroendocrine (Merkel cell) carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 31: 315–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wong KC, Zuletta F, Clarke SJ, Kennedy PJ. Clinical management and treatment outcomes of Merkel cell carcinoma. Aust N Z J Surg 1998; 68: 354–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ott MJ, Tanabe KK, Gadd MA, Stark P, Smith BL, Finkelstein DM, Souba WW. Multimodality management of Merkel cell carcinoma. Arch Surg 1999; 134: 388–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tennvall J, Biorklund A, Johansson L, Akerman M. Merkel cell carcinoma: management of primary, recurrent and metastatic disease. A clinicopathological study of 17 patients. Eur J Surg Oncol 1990; 15: 1–9.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shack RB, Barton RM, DeLozier J, Rees RS, Lynch JB. Is aggressive surgical management justified in the treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma? Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 94: 970–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Victor NS, Morton B, Smith JW. Merkel cell cancer: is prophylactic lymph node dissection indicated? Am Surg 1996; 62: 879–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pergolizzi J, Pelczar M, Conaway GL. Merkel cell carcinoma: an aggressive malignancy. Am Surg 1997; 63: 450–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cheung DSM, McInnes IE. Merkel cell carcinoma. Aust N Z J Surg 1998; 68: 622–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Perez JA, Poblete MT, Castillo P, Ramirez P, De Sousa U, Perez A. Merkel cell carcinoma. Report of 4 cases. Rev Med Chil 1998; 126: 553–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wilder RB, Harari PM, Graham AR, Shimm DS, Cassady R. Merkel cell carcinoma: improved locoregional control with postoperative radiation therapy. Cancer 1991; 68: 1004–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yanguas I, Goday JJ, Gonzalez Guemez M. Spontaneous regression of Merkel cell carcinoma of the skin. Br J Dermatol 1997; 137: 296–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Karakousis CP, Balch CM, Urist MM, Ross MM, Smith TJ, Bartolucci AA. Local recurrence in malignant melanoma: long-term results of the multiinstitutional randomized surgical trial. Ann Surg Oncol 1996; 3: 446–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Carney DN, Gazdar AF, Bepler G, et al. Establishment and identification of small cell lung cancer cell lines having classic and variant features. Cancer Res 1985; 45: 2913–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Morrison WH, Peters LJ, Silva EG, Wendt CD, Ang KK, Goepfert H. The essential role of radiation therapy in securing locoregional control of Merkel cell carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1990; 19: 583–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH, et al. Technical details for intraoperative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma. Arch Surg 1992; 127: 392–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Messina JL, Reintgen DS, Cruse CW, Rappaport DP, Berman C, Fenske NA, Glass LF. Selective lymphadenectomy in patients with Merkel cell (cutaneous neuroendocrine) carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 1997; 4: 389–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tai PTH, YuE, Winquist E, Hammond A, Stitt L, Tonita J, Gilchrist J. Chemotherapy in neuroendocrine/Merkel cell carcinoma of the skin: case series and review of 204 cases. J Clin Oncol 2000; 18: 2493–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Surgical Oncology, Inc. 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heriberto Medina-Franco
    • 1
  • Marshall M. Urist
    • 1
  • John Fiveash
    • 2
  • Martin J. Heslin
    • 1
  • Kirby I. Bland
    • 1
  • Samuel W. Beenken
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Surgical OncologyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirmingham
  2. 2.Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Alabama at BirminghamBirmingham
  3. 3.University of Alabama at BirminghamBirmingham

Personalised recommendations