Annals of Surgical Oncology

, Volume 7, Issue 6, pp 461–468

Reliability of the Sentinel Node Procedure in Melanoma Patients: Analysis of Failures After Long-Term Follow-Up

  • Markwin G. Statius Muller
  • Paul J. Borgstein
  • Rik Pijpers
  • Paul A.M. van Leeuwen
  • Paul J. van Diest
  • Anurag Gupta
  • Sybren Meijer
Original Article

DOI: 10.1007/s10434-000-0461-7

Cite this article as:
Muller, M.G.S., Borgstein, P.J., Pijpers, R. et al. Ann Surg Oncol (2000) 7: 461. doi:10.1007/s10434-000-0461-7

Abstract

Background: The sentinel node (SN) concept assumes that early lymphatic metastases, if present, always are found first in the SN. The aim of this study was to determine the reliability ofthis procedure by establishing the success rate and number of failed procedures during a follow-up period of at least 2 years.

Methods: From August 1993 to November 1996, 204 consecutive patients with stage I and II cutaneous melanoma underwent SN biopsy by a triple technique. Preoperatively, all patients underwent (dynamic) lymphoscintigraphy. A gamma probe and blue dye helped localize the SN(s) during surgery, and these nodes subsequently were excised. These lymph nodes were step-sectioned and examined by routine and immunohistochemical staining. If the SN contained tumor cells, a lymphadenectomy was performed at a later date.

Results: The median follow-up time was 42 months. The success rate was 99%. Three patients developed a recurrence in the negative SN basin during follow-up, without simultaneous appearance of (locoregional) metastases.

Conclusions: With a 99% success rate and a 1.5% rate of failed SN procedures (7% falsenegative rate) after a median follow-up of 3.5 years, we concluded that the combined triple technique approach of detecting the SN was a reliable method to accurately identify and retrieve the SN.

Key Words

Melanoma Sentinel node procedure Follow-up False-negative Success 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© The Society of Surgical Oncology, Inc. 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Markwin G. Statius Muller
    • 1
  • Paul J. Borgstein
    • 1
  • Rik Pijpers
    • 2
  • Paul A.M. van Leeuwen
    • 1
  • Paul J. van Diest
    • 3
  • Anurag Gupta
    • 1
  • Sybren Meijer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgical OncologyUniversity Hospital Vrije UniversiteitAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Nuclear MedicineUniversity Hospital Vrije UniversiteitAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of PathologyUniversity Hospital Vrije UniversiteitAmsterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Department of Surgical OncologyAcademic Hospital Vrije UniversiteitAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations