Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Continuity and change in the transition to retirement: how time allocation, leisure practices and lifestyles evolve when work vanishes in later life

  • 106 Accesses

Abstract

With increased longevity and socio-structural as well as socio-cultural changes, ageing research has shown a growing diversity of patterns in retirement lifestyles (Scherger et al. in Ageing Soc 31:146–172, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x10000577). The transition from work to retirement is of particular interest to the study of the everyday lives, leisure activities and lifestyles of older adults, as questions on the meaning of work and leisure, activity and productivity are re-negotiated. This paper addresses the questions: how are the everyday lives of older adults re-organised when work vanishes? Are there lifestyles that are more easily maintained through retirement, whereas others are more prone to change? And which patterns of social inequalities underlie these processes? Drawing on data from the GTUS, this paper discusses similarities and differences in the time allocation of older working and non-working adults aged 55+ years (matched sample). Results show that the time spent on work is primarily taken up by household chores, media use and personal activities. Hierarchical cluster analysis identifies four activity clusters resp. lifestyles among the 55+: (1) a passive leisure lifestyle, (2) an active leisure lifestyle, (3) a paid work-centred lifestyle and (4) a housework-centred lifestyle. None of the clusters, however, comprised exclusively working or non-working older adults. The active leisure cluster comprised an equal share of working and non-working persons, suggesting that this kind of lifestyle allows for stronger continuity across work and retirement. It was more easily obtained by higher educated women who live separated from their partners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Notes

  1. 1.

    Persons working for less than 1 h/day are also considered non-working; if at the same time they receive pension benefits, their work status is “retired”, if they are seek for work, they work status is “unemployed”, etc.

  2. 2.

    Defined tolerance levels for age = ± 1 year maximum; tolerance levels for all categorical variables = 0.

  3. 3.

    http://www.doingtransitions.org/en/research-projects/wanka-doing-retiring/.

References

  1. Atchley RC (1989) A continuity theory of normal aging. Gerontologist 29:183–190. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/29.2.183

  2. Backhaus K, Erichson B, Plinke W, Weiber R (2003) Multivariate Analysemethoden: Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung. Springer, Berlin

  3. Boudiny K (2013) ‘Active ageing’: from empty rhetoric to effective policy tool. Ageing Soc 33(6):1077–1098. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X1200030X

  4. Bourdieu P (1979) La distinction: critique sociale du jugement. Éditions de Minuit, Paris

  5. Burgess EW (1960) Aging in western societies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  6. Burr JA, Mutchler JE, Caro FG (2007) Productive activity clusters among middle-aged and older adults: intersecting forms and time commitments. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 62:267–275. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/62.4.S267

  7. Caprara M, Molina MÁ, Schettini R, Santacreu M, Orosa T, Mendoza-Núñez VM, Rojas M, Fernández-Ballesteros R (2013) Active aging promotion: results from the vital aging program. Curr Gerontol Geriatr Res 2013:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/817813

  8. de Beauvoir S (1972) The coming of age. Putnam, New York

  9. Fasang AE (2010) Retirement: institutional pathways and individual trajectories in Britain and Germany. Sociol Res Online 15:1–16. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2110

  10. Fasang AE (2012) Retirement patterns and income inequality. Soc Forces 90:685–711. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sor015

  11. Fernández-Ballesteros R (2011) Positive ageing. Objective, subjective, and combined outcomes. Sensoria J Mind Brain Cult 7:22–30

  12. Freeman E (2010) Time binds: queer temporalities, queer histories. Duke University Press, Durham

  13. Gilleard CJ, Higgs P (2000) Cultures of ageing: self, citizen, and the body. Prentice Hall, Harlow

  14. Guillemard A-M (1972) La retraite: une mort sociale. Sociologie des conduites en situation de retraite, Paris

  15. Hank K, Erlinghagen M (2008) Produktives Altern und informelle Arbeit: Stand der Forschung und Perspektiven. In: Erlinghagen M, Hank K (eds) Alter(n) und Gesellschaft: Produktives Altern und informelle Arbeit in modernen Gesellschaften. Theoretische Perspektiven und empirische Befunde. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 9–24

  16. Jivraj S, Nazroo J, Barnes M (2012) Change in social detachment in older age in England. In: Banks J, Nazroo J, Steptoe A (eds) The dynamics of ageing: evidence from the English longitudinal study of ageing 2002–10 (Wave 5). Institute for Fiscal Studies, London, pp 49–97

  17. Katz S (2000) Busy bodies: activity, aging, and the management of everyday life. J Aging Stud 14:135–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-4065(00)80008-0

  18. Klumb PL, Baltes MM (1999) Validity of retrospective time-use reports in old age. Appl Cogn Psychol 13:527–539. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199912)13:6%3c527:AID-ACP614%3e3.0.CO;2-1

  19. Kohli M (1985) Die Institutionalisierung des Lebenslaufs Historische Befunde und theoretische Argumente. Kolner Z Soz Sozpsychol 37:1–29

  20. Kohli M (2007) The institutionalization of the life course: looking back to look ahead. Res Hum Dev 4:253–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427600701663122

  21. Künemund H (2006) Tätigkeiten und Engagement im Ruhestand. In: Tesch-Römer C, Engstler H, Wurm S (eds) Altwerden in Deutschland Sozialer Wandel und individuelle Entwicklung in der zweiten Lebenshälfte. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 289–327

  22. Laslett P (1989) A fresh map of life: the emergence of the third age. Weidenfeld and Nicolson, London

  23. Lessenich S (2008) Die Neuerfindung des Sozialen: der Sozialstaat im flexiblen Kapitalismus. Transcript, Bielefeld

  24. Lave J, Wenger E (1991) Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  25. Lewis GH, Michel RC (1990) Microsimulation techniques for tax and transfer analysis. The Urban Institute, Washington

  26. Loretto W, Vickerstaff S (2015) Gender, age and flexible working in later life. Work Employ Soc 29:233–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017014545267

  27. Marshall BL, Katz S (2016) How old am I? Digital culture and society 2. https://doi.org/10.14361/dcs-2016-0110

  28. May J, Thrift N (2003) Timespace: geographies of temporality. Routledge, London

  29. Mayer KU (2009) New directions in life course research. Annu Rev Sociol 35:413–433. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134619

  30. Mergenthaler A, Sackreuther I, Staudinger UM (2018) Productive activity patterns among 60–70-year-old retirees in Germany. Ageing Soc 39:1–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0144686x17001404

  31. Moen P, Kim JE, Hofmeister H (2001) Couples’ work/retirement transitions, gender, and marital quality. Soc Psychol Q 64:55. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090150

  32. Moffatt S, Heaven B (2017) “Planning for uncertainty”: narratives on retirement transition experiences. Ageing Soc 37:879–898. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X15001476

  33. Morrow-Howell N, Putnam M, Lee YS, Greenfield JC, Inoue M, Chen H (2014) An investigation of activity profiles of older adults. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 69:809–821. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbu002

  34. Nuttman-Shwartz O (2004) Like a high wave: adjustment to retirement. Gerontologist 44:229–236. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/44.2.229

  35. Peine A, Neven L (2018) From intervention to co-constitution: new directions in theorizing about aging and technology. Gerontologist (online first). https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny050

  36. Phillipson C, Vickerstaff S, Lain D (2016) Achieving fuller working lives: labour market and policy issues in the United Kingdom. Aust J Soc Issues 51:187–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1839-4655.2016.tb00373.x

  37. Quick HE, Moen P (1998) Gender, employment and retirement quality: a life course approach to the differential experiences of men and women. J Occup Health Psychol 3:44–64. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.3.1.44

  38. Radl J (2007) Individuelle Determinanten des Renteneintrittsalters – Eine empirische Analyse von Übergängen in den Ruhestand. Z Soziol 36(1):43–64

  39. Reckwitz A (2002) Toward a theory of social practices: a development in culturalist theorizing. Eur J Soc Theory 5:243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432

  40. Rosenmayr L (1983) Die späte Freiheit: das Alter, ein Stück bewusst gelebten Lebens. Severin und Siedler, Berlin

  41. Rowles G, Bernard M (eds) (2013) Environmental gerontology: making meaningful places in old age. Springer, New York

  42. Schatzki TR (1996) Social practices: a Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge University Press, New York

  43. Schendera C (2010) Clusteranalyse mit SPSS: mit Faktorenanalyse. Oldenbourg, München

  44. Scherger S, Nazroo J, Higgs P (2011) Leisure activities and retirement: do structures of inequality change in old age? Ageing Soc 31:146–172. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X10000577

  45. Schroeter KR (2012) Altersbilder als Körperbilder: Doing age by bodyfication. In: Berner F (ed) Individuelle und kulturelle Altersbilder. VS Verlag Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 154–229

  46. Shove E, Pantzar M, Watson M (2012) The dynamics of social practice: everyday life and how it changes. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles

  47. Tews HP (1993) Neue und alte Aspekte des Strukturwandels des Alters. In: Naegele G, Tews HP (eds) Lebenslagen im Strukturwandel des Alters. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden, pp 15–42

  48. Vidovićová L (2018) The expected, evaluated, perceived, valued and prevalent social roles of older people: are they by consent? In: Zaidi A, Harper S, Howse K, Lamura G, Perek-Białas J (eds) Building evidence for active ageing policies. Springer, Singapore, pp 39–54

  49. Von Bonsdorff ME, Shultz KS, Leskinen E, Tansky J (2009) The choice between retirement and bridge employment: a continuity theory and life course perspective. Int J Aging Hum Dev 69:79–100. https://doi.org/10.2190/AG.69.2.a

  50. Wang M (2007) Profiling retirees in the retirement transition and adjustment process: examining the longitudinal change patterns of retirees’ psychological well-being. J Appl Psychol 92:455–474. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.455

  51. Wang M, Shi J (2014) Psychological research on retirement. Annu Rev Psychol 65:209–233. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115131

  52. Wang M, Zhan Y, Liu S, Shultz KS (2008) Antecedents of bridge employment: a longitudinal investigation. J Appl Psychol 93:818–830. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.818

  53. Wanka A (2017) Spaces and practices of privacy in older age. In: Beyvers E, Helm P, Hennig M, Keckeis C, Kreknin I, Püschel F (eds) Räume und Kulturen des Privaten. Springer, Wiesbaden, pp 85–107

  54. Warde A (2016) The practice of eating. Polity Press, Malden

  55. West C, Fenstermaker S (1995) Doing difference. Gend Soc 9(1):8–37

Download references

Funding

This author is part of the Research Training Group ‘Doing Transitions’ funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG). The data file used in this paper is a scientific use file provided by the German Federal Office of Statistics for scientific purposes only.

Author information

Correspondence to Anna Wanka.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there are no competing financial interests.

Ethical approval

An ethical approval was not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible editor: Marja J. Aartsen.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 4 and 5.

Table 4 Occupational groups by socio-demographic characteristics, matched sample 55+ years, German Time Use Data 2012/2013
Table 5 Activity indices in hours by occupational status with Bonferroni-adjusted post hoc tests; matched sample 55+ years; German Time Use Survey 2012/2013

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wanka, A. Continuity and change in the transition to retirement: how time allocation, leisure practices and lifestyles evolve when work vanishes in later life. Eur J Ageing (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-019-00526-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Retirement transition
  • Practice theories
  • Leisure
  • Time use
  • Lifestyles
  • Social inequalities