Advertisement

European Journal of Ageing

, Volume 15, Issue 4, pp 407–416 | Cite as

Dynamics in motivations and reasons to quit in a Care Bank: a qualitative study in Belgium

  • Sarah DuryEmail author
Original Investigation

Abstract

The aim of this study was to contribute to the understanding of why volunteers in a time bank known as “NeighborhoodPension,” which involves community-based care, are motivated to start, continue, and quit volunteering. The time bank started in 2013 and is the first time bank in Brussels, Belgium. A planned prospective longitudinal study involving qualitative focus group interviews was used to study a group of volunteers at four time points over 1 year. There were two main themes, the first of which pertains to older adults’ motives for volunteering with the time bank. These motives are largely attributable to the volunteer organization’s contextual factors. The second theme focuses on reasons for quitting volunteering. Factors for retaining volunteers relate strongly to the purpose of the volunteer organization. Co-production (i.e., engaging the volunteers in the design of the project) and having an attention officer (i.e., a confidant who listens to the volunteers’ worries) are examples of retention strategies. Moreover, earning time credits did not appear to be a motive for continued volunteering. These theoretical perspectives could help to improve organizational support of volunteers and increase the participation of older citizens in community-based volunteering. The complexity associated with retaining volunteers stems from the fact that although initial motives for volunteering are generally clearly defined, other contextual factors (such as relationships with other volunteers and organizational structure) change the initial motives and can result in volunteer turnover.

Keywords

Retention of volunteers Reasons to quit Volunteer turnover Aging in place Community care 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the older volunteers for their enthusiasm and dedication to the project and to keep attending the focus groups with commitment. I also thank the two professionals of the project to do everything in their power to include the volunteers in the project and having processed constructively all information and feedback from the volunteers in the project. Finally, I would like to thank my colleagues, prof. dr. Liesbeth De Donder and dr. Dorien Brosens, for their objective analysis of the focus groups.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  1. Allen RS, Azuero CB, Csikai EL, Parmelee PA, Shin HJ, Kvale E, Durkin DW, Burgio LD (2016) “It was very rewarding for me…”: senior volunteers’ experiences with implementing a reminiscence and creative activity intervention. The Gerontologist 56:357–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bengtsson M (2016) How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open 2:8–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolin K, Lindgren B, Lundborg P (2008) Your next of kin or your own career? Caring and working among the 50+ of Europe. J Health Econ 27:718–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3:77–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Butrica B, Johnson R, Zedlewski S (2009) Volunteer dynamics of older Americans. J Gerontol Soc Sci 64:644–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cahn E (2004) No more throw-away people: the co-production imperative, 2nd edn. Essential books, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Calman L, Brunton L, Molassiotis A (2013) Developing longitudinal qualitative designs: lessons learned and recommendations for health services research. BMC Med Res Methodol 13:14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chacon F, Vecina M, Davila M (2007) The three-stage model of volunteers’ duration of service. Soc Behav Pers 53:627–642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen H, Morrow-Howell N (2015) Antecedents and outcomes of older adults’ motivations to volunteer with experience corps®. Res Hum Dev 12:118–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark T (2008) ‘We’re over-researched here!’ Exploring accounts of research fatigue within qualitative research engagements. Sociology 42:953–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clary G, Snyder M (1999) The motivations to volunteer: theoretical and practical considerations. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 8:156–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clary E, Snyder M, Ridge R, Copeland J, Stukas A, Haugen J, Miene P (1998) Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: a functional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 74:1516–1530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Collom E (2007) Alternative movements. Encyclopedia of activism and social justice. SAGE, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  14. Collom E (2011) Motivations and differential participation in a community currency system: the dynamics within a local social movement organization. Soc Forum 26:144–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Witte N, Smetcoren A-S, De Donder L, Dury S, Buffel T, Kardol T, Verté D (2012) A house? A home! Housing in later life [Een huis? Een thuis! Over ouderen en wonen]. Vanden Broele, Brugge (In Dutch) Google Scholar
  16. Dysvik A, Kuvaas B, Gagné M (2013) An investigation of the unique, synergistic and balanced relationships between basic psychological needs and intrinsic motivation. J Appl Soc Psychol 43:1050–1064CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gautun H, Bratt C (2016) Caring too much? Lack of public services to older people reduces attendance at work among their children. Eur J Ageing.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-016-0403-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grube J, Piliavin J (2000) Role identity, organizational experiences, and volunteer performance. J Pers Soc Psychol 26:1108–1119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hartenian L (2007) Nonprofit agency dependence on direct service and indirect support volunteers: an empirical investigation. Nonprofit Manag Lead 17:319–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haski-Leventhal D, Bargal D (2008) The volunteer stages and transitions model: organizational socialization of volunteers. Hum Relat 61:67–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hennink MM (2007) International focus group research: a handbook for the health and social sciences. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hermanowicz J (2013) The longitudinal qualitative interview. Qual Sociol 36:189–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15:1277–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kahana E, Bhatta T, Lovegreen LD, Kahana B, Midlarsky E (2013) Altruism, helping and volunteering: pathways to well-being in late life. J Aging Health 25:159–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Liamputtong P (2011) Focus group methodology. Principles and practice. SAGE, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liao-Troth M (2008) Challenges in volunteer management. Information Age Publishing, CharlotteGoogle Scholar
  27. Linardi S, McConnell M (2011) No excuses for good behavior: volunteering and the social environment. J Public Econ 95:445–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Madriz E (2003) Focus groups in feminist research. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y (eds) Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials, 2nd edn. SAGE, London, pp 363–387Google Scholar
  29. Marks M (2009) A theoretical and empirical investigation of co-production interventions for involuntary youth in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems. Dissertation Abstracts International (UMI No. 3345766)Google Scholar
  30. Marks M (2012) Time banking service exchange systems: a review of the research and policy and practice implications in support of youth in transition. Child Youth Serv Rev 34:1230–1236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McHenry JC, Insel KC, Einstein GO, Vidrine AN, Koerner KM, Morrow DG (2015) Recruitment of older adults: success may be in the details. The Gerontologist 55:845–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Means R, Richards S, Smith R (2008) Community care. Policy and practice, 4th edn. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Miller L, Gary E, Powell N, Seltzer J (1990) Determinants of turnover among volunteers. Hum Relat 43:901–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miller EA, Mor V, Clark M (2010) Reforming long-term care in the United States: findings from a national survey of specialists. The Gerontologist 50:238–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Morrow-Howell N, Hong S, Tang F (2009) Who benefits from volunteering? Variations in perceived benefits. The Gerontologist 49:91–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nakagawa S, Laratta R, Bovaird T (2011) Hureai Kippu: lessens from Japan for the big society. http://www.jlgc.org.uk/en/pdfs/Hureai%20Kippu%20%20Lessons%20from%20Japan%20for%20the%20Big%20SocietyCESedit17March2011.pdf. Accessed Apr 2015
  37. O’Meara P, Tourie V, Rae J (2012) Factors influencing the successful integration of ambulance volunteers and first responders into ambulance services. Health Soc Care Community 20(5):488–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ormsby J, Stanley M, Jaworski K (2010) Older men’s participation in community-based men’s sheds programmes. Health Soc Care Community 18:607–613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Overgaard C (2015) The boundaries of care work. Health Soc Care Community 23:380–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pavey L, Greitemeyer T, Sparks P (2011) Highlighting relatedness promotes prosocial motives and behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 37:905–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Saldana J (2003) Longitudinal qualitative research: analyzing change through time. AltaMira Press, Walnut Creek, CAGoogle Scholar
  42. Schmidt AE, Ilinca S, Schulmann K et al (2016) Fit for caring: factors associated with informal care provision by older caregivers with and without multimorbidity. Eur J Ageing 13:103–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Seyfang G (2003) With a little help from my friends: evaluating time banks as a tool for community self-help. Local Econ 18:253–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Stephens C, Breheny M, Mansvelt J (2015) Volunteering as reciprocity: beneficial and harmful effects of social policies to encourage contribution in older age. J Aging Stud 33:22–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stevens E (1991) Toward satisfaction and retention of senior volunteers. J Gerontol Soc Work 16:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tang F, Morrow-Howell N, Hong S (2009) Inclusion of diverse older populations in volunteering. The importance of institutional facilitation. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 38:810–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tang F, Choi F, Morrow-Howell N (2010a) Organizational support and volunteering. Benefits for older adults. The Gerontologist 50:603–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tang F, Morrow-Howell N, Choi F (2010b) Why do older adults stop volunteering? Ageing Soc 30:859–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. The Young Foundation (2012) Care4Care, Overview. https://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Care4Care-Overview.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2015
  50. Valor C, Papoikonomou E (2016) Time baninking in Spain. Exploring their structure, management and users’ profile. Rev Int Soc.  https://doi.org/10.3989/ris.2016.74.1.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. van Dijk H, Cramm J, Nieboer A (2013) The experiences of neighbour, volunteer and professional support-givers in supporting community dwelling older people. Health Soc Care Community 21:150–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Warburton J, McDonald C (2009) The challenges of the new institutional environment: an Australian case study of older volunteers in the contemporary non-profit sector. Ageing Soc 29:823–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Willems J, Huybrechts G, Jegers M, Vantilborgh T, Bidee J, Pepermans R (2012) Volunteer decisions (not) to leave: reasons to quit versus functional motives to stay. Hum Relat 65:883–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wilson J (2012) Volunteerism research: a review essay. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 41:176–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Foundation Flanders (FWO)BrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.Department of Adult Educational Sciences, Faculty of Psychology and Educational SciencesVrije Universiteit BrusselBrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations