Cognitive functioning is more closely related to real-life mobility than to laboratory-based mobility parameters
- 311 Downloads
Increasing evidence indicates that mobility depends on cognitive resources, but the exact relationships between various cognitive functions and different mobility parameters still need to be investigated. This study examines the hypothesis that cognitive functioning is more closely related to real-life mobility performance than to mobility capacity as measured with standardized laboratory tests. The final sample used for analysis consisted of 66 older adults (72.3 ± 5.6 years). Cognition was assessed by measures of planning (HOTAP test), spatial working memory (Grid-Span test) and visuospatial attention (Attention Window test). Mobility capacity was assessed by an instrumented version of the Timed Up-and-Go test (iTUG). Mobility performance was assessed with smartphones which collected accelerometer and GPS data over one week to determine the spatial extent and temporal duration of real-life activities. Data analyses involved an exploratory factor analysis and correlation analyses. Mobility measures were reduced to four orthogonal factors: the factor ‘real-life mobility’ correlated significantly with most cognitive measures (between r = .229 and r = .396); factors representing ‘sit-to-stand transition’ and ‘turn’ correlated with fewer cognitive measures (between r = .271 and r = .315 and between r = .210 and r = .316, respectively), and the factor representing straight gait correlated with only one cognitive measure (r = .237). Among the cognitive functions tested, visuospatial attention was associated with most mobility measures, executive functions with fewer and spatial working memory with only one mobility measure. Capacity and real-life performance represent different aspects of mobility. Real-life mobility is more closely associated with cognition than mobility capacity, and in our data this association is most pronounced for visuospatial attention. The close link between real-life mobility and visuospatial attention should be considered by interventions targeting mobility in old age.
KeywordsOut-of-home mobility Ageing Life-space Instrumented Timed Up-and-Go test Capacity Performance
We would like to gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Sandra Arenz, Sandra Brück, Henning Voss and Julia Wobst in data collection and Sabato Mellone in data processing and data analysis.
This study was funded by a grant from the German Sport University to the Graduate College ‘Reduced Mobility in Old Age’ and by the European Commission (FARSEEING, Seventh Framework Program, Cooperation—ICT, Grant Agreement No. 288940).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Costello A, Osborne J (2005) Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Eval 10(7)Google Scholar
- McGough EL, Kelly VE, Logsdon RG, McCurry SM, Cochrane BB, Engel JM, Teri L (2011) Associations between physical performance and executive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: gait speed and the Timed “Up and Go” test. Phys Ther 91:1198–1207. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20100372 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Menzel-Begemann A (2009) HOTAP – Handlungsorganisation und Tagesplanung. Testverfahren zur Erfassung der Planungsfähigkeit im Alltag, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
- Mielke MM, Roberts RO, Savica R, Cha R, Drubach DI, Christianson T, Petersen RC et al (2013) Assessing the temporal relationship between cognition and gait: slow gait predicts cognitive decline in the mayo clinic study of aging. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci 68(8):929–937. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gls256 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mirelman A, Weiss A, Buchman AS, Bennett DA, Giladi N, Hausdorff JM (2014) Association between performance on Timed Up and Go subtasks and mild cognitive impairment: further insights into the links between cognitive and motor function. J Am Geriatr Soc 62(4):673–678. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12734 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ryu U, Ahn K, Kim E, Kim M, Kim B, Woo S, Chang Y (2013) Adaptive step detection algorithm for wireless smart step counter. In: 2013 international conference on information science and applications (ICISA). IEEE, pp 1–4. http://doi.org/10.1109/ICISA.2013.6579332
- Soumaré A, Tavernier B, Alpérovitch A, Tzourio C, Elbaz A (2009) A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of the relationship between walking speed and cognitive function in community-dwelling elderly people. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci 64(10):1058–1065. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glp077 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- van Lummel RC, Walgaard S, Pijnappels M, Elders PJM, Garcia-Aymerich J, van Dieën JH, Beek PJ (2015) Physical performance and physical activity in older adults: associated but separate domains of physical function in old age. PLoS ONE 10(12):e0144048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wahl H, Wettstein M, Shoval N, Oswald F, Kaspar R, Issacson M, Heinik J et al (2013) Interplay of cognitive and motivational resources for out-of-home behavior in a sample of cognitively heterogeneous older adults: findings of the SenTra project. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 68(5):691–702. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbs106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Williams B, Brown T, Onsman A (2012) Exploratory factor analysis: a five-step guide for novices. Aust J Paramed. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/jephc/vol8/iss3/1
- World Health Organization (2005) International classification of functioning, disability, and health. http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/
- Zhu W, Howard VJ, Wadley VG, Hutto B, Blair SN, Vena JE, Hooker SP et al (2015) Association between objectively measured physical activity and cognitive function in older adults-the reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke study. J Am Geriatr Soc 63(12):2447–2454. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13829 CrossRefGoogle Scholar