Advertisement

European Journal of Ageing

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 209–218 | Cite as

Identifying important factors for older adults’ physical activity participation across individual/group, structured/unstructured contexts

  • Katie L. BeckEmail author
  • Lori E. Weeks
  • William J. Montelpare
  • Dany J. MacDonald
Original Investigation

Abstract

Most Canadian older adults do not meet physical activity recommendations. Researchers have investigated participation barriers and facilitators, with little consideration given to how specific factors influence activity participation for older adults. The purpose of this study was to identify unique factors that influence older adults’ activity selection and to determine in which type of setting they are preferred. Using a two-phase methodology, identification of 25 factors affecting participation was followed by 45 older adults ranking the factors within four categories of activities: individual unstructured, group unstructured, individual structured, and group structured. Phase 1 analysis ranked each factor within each category. Further analysis found that there was a statistical difference between categories, indicating that older adults found different factors important, depending on the category of physical activity in question. This led to phase 2 analyses which identified three levels of factor groupings including the following factors: level A: fun, satisfaction, commitment, and energize; level B: safety, learning, awareness, internal motivation, and productive; and level C: meaningful contribution, intensity, and motivation. Additionally, some factors which were not identified in all categories were identified as unique to certain categories. These included creativity, hobbies, meaningful contribution, spiritual, competence, interaction casual, regularly scheduled, competition, self-efficacy physical, and team. This information can be used by individuals as well as program providers to nurture these factors within physical activity programs, which may lead to increased participation in this age cohort.

Keywords

Older adults Physical activity Factors Importance Participation 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Informed consent

All participants provided signed informed consent forms before proceeding with participation in this research.

Research involving human participants

This research is in compliance with human ethics guidelines and was approved by the Research Ethics Board at the University of Prince Edward Island.

References

  1. Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura A (2004) Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav 31:143–164. doi: 10.1177/1090198104263660 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauman A, Sallis J, Dzewaltowski D, Owen N (2002) Toward a better understanding of influences on physical activity. Am J Prev Med 23(2S):5–14. doi: 10.1016/S0749-3797(02)00469-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bethancourt HJ, Rosenberg DE, Beatty T, Arterburn DE (2014) Barriers to and facilitators of physical activity program use among older adults. Clin Med Res 12:10–20. doi: 10.3121/cmr.2013.1171 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cleland V, Sodergren M, Otahal P, Timperio A, Ball K, Crawford D, Salmon J, McNaughton SA (2015) Associations between the perceived environment and physical activity among aged 55–65 years: Does urban-rural area of residence matter? J Aging Phys Activ 23:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dacey M, Baltzell A, Zaichkowsky L (2008) Older adults’ intrinsic and extrinsic motivation toward physical activity. Am J Health Behav 6:570–583Google Scholar
  7. Deci EL, Ryan RM (1985) Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fridlung Dunton G, Vaughan E (2008) Anticipated affective consequences of physical activity adoption and maintenance. Health Psychol 27:703–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Godin G (1993) The theories of reasoned action and planned behavior: Overview of findings, emerging research problems and usefulness for exercise promotion. J Appl Sport Psychol 5:141–157. doi: 10.1080/10413209308411311 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gravetter FJ, Wallnau LR (2000) Statistics for the behavioural sciences, 5th edn. Wadsworth, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  11. Henderson KA, Casper J, Wilson BE, Dern L (2012) Behaviours, reasons, and outcomes perceived by senior games participants. J Park Rec Admin 30:19–35Google Scholar
  12. Janssen I (2012) Health care costs of physical inactivity in Canadian adults. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 37:1–4. doi: 10.1139/h2012-061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Janz N, Becker M (1984) The health belief model: a decade later. Health Educ Quart 11:1–47. doi: 10.1177/109019818401100101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kendzierski D, DeCarlo KD (1991) Physical activity enjoyment scale: two validation studies. J Sport Exercise Psychol 13:30–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kerr J, Marshall SJ, Patterson RE, Marinac CR, Natarajan L, Rosenburg D, Wasilenko K, Crist K (2013) Objectively measured physical activity is related to cognitive function in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 61:1927–1931. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12524 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. King AC, Rejeski WJ, Buchner DM (1998) Physical activity interventions targeting older adults: a critical review and recommendations. Am J Prev Med 15:318–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mullen SP, Olson EA, Phillips SM, Szabo AN, Wojcicki TR, Mailey EL, McAuley E (2011) Measuring enjoyment of physical activity in older adults: invariance of the physical activity enjoyment scale (paces) across groups and time. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Activ 8:1–10. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-8-103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. O’Brien Cousins S (1996) Exercise cognition among elderly women. J Appl Sport Psychol 8:131–145. doi: 10.1080/10413209608406472 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Price AE, Reed JA, Long S, Maslow AL, Hooker SP (2012) The association of natural elements with physical activity intensity during trail use by older adults. J Phy Activ Health 9:718–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Prochaska JO, Di Clemente CC (1982) Transtheoretical therapy: TOWARD a more integrative model of change. Psychother Theor Res 19:276–288. doi: 10.1037/h0088437 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ruby MB, Dunn EW, Perrino A, Gillis R, Viel S (2011) The invisible benefits of exercise. Health Psychol 30:67–74. doi: 10.1037/a0021859 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Scanlan TK, Carpenter PJ, Schmidt GW, Simons JP, Keeler B (1993) An introduction to the sport commitment model. J Sport Exercise Psychol 18:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schutzer KA, Graves BS (2004) Barriers and motivations to exercise in older adults. Prev Med 39:1056–1061. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stiggelbout M, Hopman-Rock M, van Mechelen W (2008) Entry correlates and motivations of older adults participating in organized exercise programs. J Aging Phy Activ 16:342–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Weiss MR, Williams L (2004) The why of youth sport involvement: a developmental perspective on motivational processes. In: Weiss MR (ed) Dev sport exercise psychol: a lifespan perspective. Morgantown, WV, pp 223–268Google Scholar
  26. Witcher CSG, Holt NL, Spence JC, O’Brien Cousins S (2007) A case study of physical activity among older adults in rural Newfoundland, Canada. J Aging Phys Act 15:166–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katie L. Beck
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lori E. Weeks
    • 2
  • William J. Montelpare
    • 1
  • Dany J. MacDonald
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Applied Human SciencesUniversity of Prince Edward IslandCharlottetownCanada
  2. 2.School of NursingDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations