European Journal of Ageing

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 131–140 | Cite as

The role of cognitive resources for subjective work ability and health in nursing

  • Andreas Ihle
  • Erika Borella
  • Marlen Rahnfeld
  • Sandrine R. Müller
  • Sören Enge
  • Winfried Hacker
  • Jürgen Wegge
  • Michel Oris
  • Matthias Kliegel
Original Investigation

Abstract

Cognitive resources can be considered to be key variables in the context of work ability and health, particularly in the aging workforce. However, research on this issue is sparse, lacking a comprehensive examination of specific cognitive functions. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to examine the association of cognitive resources with subjective work ability and health in more detail. In 166 geriatric care workers (mean age 42.1 years, SD = 11.5, range 20–62), subjective work ability and health were assessed. Additionally, a comprehensive battery of cognitive tests measuring crystallized intelligence, cognitive speed, short-term memory, working memory, and inhibition was administered in a standardized procedure. Controlling for individual differences in age, education, depressive symptoms, self-regulation strategies (in terms of selective optimization with compensation), and cognitive resources (particularly better performance in short-term memory, working memory, and inhibition) were related to better subjective work ability and health. The present results demonstrate the relation of a variety of specific cognitive functions with subjective work ability and health over and above individual differences in age, education, depressive symptoms, and self-regulation strategies. Implications to explicitly consider a set of cognitive resources in models of work and organizational psychology, particularly with respect to the aging workforce, are discussed.

Keywords

Subjective work ability Subjective health Cognition Aging workforce Nursing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the other members of the ODEM study group, which consists of Paulina Bilinska, Katharina Goerdeler, Katharina Roitzsch, Nadine Schrod, Anne Tomaschek, and Johannes Wendsche. Furthermore, we wish to thank our student assistants Martha Baumgärtel, Florian Dietsch, Tino Franzke, Franziska Giller, Adam Karcz, Nadine Richter, Annett Weber, and Monique Zenker for helping with the data collection, as well as Lena Küttler and Franziska Spannbauer for helping to prepare the cognitive test battery. Winfried Hacker, Matthias Kliegel, and Jürgen Wegge acknowledge support from the German Research Foundation (DFG; grants HA 2249/17-1, KL 2303/7-1, and WE 1504/12-1)). Michel Oris benefited from the support of the NCCR LIVES. Overcoming Vulnerability. Life Course Perspectives. The NCCR are a tool of the Swiss National Science Foundation. The publication was further supported by a PhD scholarship awarded by the German Social Accident Insurance (Deutsche Gesetzliche Unfallversicherung, DGUV) to Marlen Rahnfeld.

Conflict of interest

We declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ahlstrom L, Grimby-Ekman A, Hagberg M, Dellve L (2010) The work ability index and single-item question: associations with sick leave, symptoms, and health—a prospective study of women on long-term sick leave. Scand J Work Environ Health 36(5):404–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakker AB, Demerouti E (2007) The job demands-resources model: state of the art. J Manag Psychol 22(3):309–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakker AB, van Veldhoven M, Xanthopoulou D (2010) Beyond the demand-control model thriving on high job demands and resources. J Pers Psychol 9(1):3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baltes PB, Baltes MM (1989) Selective optimization with compensation—a psychological model of successful aging. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 35:85–105Google Scholar
  5. Baltes PB, Baltes MM, Freund AM, Lang FR (eds) (1999) The measurement of selection, optimization, and compensation (SOC) by self report: technical report 1999. Materialien aus der Bildungsforschung (Methods in Educational Science) vol 66, Berlin: Max-Planck-Institut für Bildungsforschung (Max Planck Institute for Human Development)Google Scholar
  6. Bech P (2004) Measuring the dimensions of psychological general well-being by the WHO-5. Qual Life Newslett 32:15–16Google Scholar
  7. BGW/DAK (2003) Gesundheitsreport 2003—altenpflege: arbeitsbedingungen und Gesundheit von Pflegekräften in der stationären Altenpflege [Health report 2003—geriatric care: job conditions and health of nurses in geriatric care]. BGW, HamburgGoogle Scholar
  8. Borella E, Carretti B, De Beni R (2008) Working memory and inhibition across the adult life-span. Acta Psychol 128(1):33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Camerino D, Conway PM, Van der Heijden BIJM, Estryn-Behar M, Consonni D, Gould D, Hasselhorn HM (2006) Low-perceived work ability, ageing and intention to leave nursing: a comparison among 10 European countries. J Adv Nurs 56(5):542–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeSalvo KB, Jones TM, Peabody J, McDonald J, Fihn S, Fan V, Muntner P (2009) Health care expenditure prediction with a single item, Self-rated health measure. Med Care 47(4):440–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elinson L, Houck P, Marcus SC, Pincus HA (2004) Depression and the ability to work. Psychiatr Serv 55(1):29–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Evers A, Klusmann V, Schwarzer R, Heuser I (2012) Adherence to physical and mental activity interventions: coping plans as a mediator and prior adherence as a moderator. Br J Health Psychol 17:477–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fadyl JK, McPherson KM, Schluter PJ, Turner-Stokes L (2010) Factors contributing to work-ability for injured workers: literature review and comparison with available measures. Disabil Rehabil 32(14):1173–1183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Freund AM, Baltes PB (1998) Selection, optimization, and compensation as strategies of life management: correlations with subjective indicators of successful aging. Psychol Aging 13(4):531–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gatz M, Svedberg P, Pedersen NL, Mortimer JA, Berg S, Johansson B (2001) Education and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease: findings from the study of dementia in Swedish Twins. J Gerontol: Psychol Sci 56B(5):292–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Golubic R, Milosevic M, Knezevic B, Mustajbegovic J (2009) Work-related stress, education and work ability among hospital nurses. J Adv Nurs 65(10):2056–2066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hacker W (1993) Occupational psychology between basic and applied orientation: some methodological issues. Le Travail Humain 5b:157–169Google Scholar
  18. Hacker W (2003) Action regulation theory: a practical tool for the design of modern work processes. Eur J Work Org Psychol 12(2):105–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hasselhorn HM, Freude G (2007) Der Work Ability Index—ein Leitfaden [The Work Ability Index—a guide]. NW Verlag, BremerhavenGoogle Scholar
  20. Hochschild AR (2003) The second shift. Penguin Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoppe C, Müller U, Werheid K, Thöne A, von Cramon DY (2000) Digit ordering test: clinical, psychometric, and experimental evaluation of a verbal working memory test. Clin Neuropsychol 14(1):38–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ihle A, Oris O, Fagot D, Baeriswyl M, Guichard E, Kliegel M (submitted) The association of leisure activities in middle adulthood with cognitive performance in old age: the moderating role of educational level and health status. GerontologyGoogle Scholar
  23. Inauen J, Hossain MM, Johnston RB, Mosler HJ (2013) Acceptance and use of eight arsenic-safe drinking water options in Bangladesh. Plos One 8:e53640Google Scholar
  24. Isfort M, Weidner F (2007) Pflege-thermometer (2007). Eine bundesweite repräsentative befragung zur situation und zum Leistungsspektrum des Pflegepersonals sowie zur Patientensicherheit im Krankenhaus [evaluation of care (2007), A nationwide representative Survey regarding the situation and service of the care personnel], Köln: dipGoogle Scholar
  25. Jorm AF (2000) Is depression a risk factor for dementia or cognitive decline?. A review. Gerontology 46(4):219–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Karasek RA (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Q 24:285–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Karasek RA, Theorell T (1990) Healthy work: stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Kliegel M, McDaniel MA, Einstein GO (2000) Plan formation, retention, and execution in prospective memory: a new approach and age-related effects. Mem Cognit 28:1041–1049CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kohn ML, Schooler C (1983) Work and personality: an inquiry into the impact of social stratification. Ablex, NorwoodGoogle Scholar
  30. Lehrl S (1977) Der Mehrfachwahlwortschatztest MWT [The “Mehrfachwahlwortschatztest” MWT]. Straube, ErlangenGoogle Scholar
  31. Liebermann S, Wegge J, Müller A (2013) Drivers of the expectation of remaining in the same job until retirement age: a working life span demands-resource model. Eur J Work Org Psychol 22:347–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Monteiro MS, Ilmarinen J, Correa HR (2006) Work ability of workers in different age groups in a public health institution in Brazil. Int J Occup Saf Ergon 12(4):417–427Google Scholar
  33. Morfeld M, Kirchberger I, Bullinger M (2011) SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand—Deutsche version des short form-36 Health Survey 2, ergänzte und überarbeitete Auflage [SF-36 Health Survey—German version of the short form-36 Health Survey 2nd, revised edn]. Hogrefe Verlag, GöttingenGoogle Scholar
  34. Müller A, Weigl M, Heiden B, Herbig B, Glaser J, Angerer P (2013) Selection, optimization, and compensation in nursing: exploration of job-specific strategies, scale development, and age-specific associations to work ability. J Adv Nurs 69(7):1630–1642CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Newman JP, Widom CS, Nathan S (1985) Passive avoidance in syndromes of disinhibition: psychopathology and extraversion. J Pers Soc Psychol 48:1316–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ownby RL, Hertzog C, Crocco E, Duara R (2006) Factors related to medication adherence in memory disorder clinic patients. Aging Ment Health 10(4):378–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Park DC, Hertzog C, Leventhal H, Morrell RW, Leventhal E, Birchmore D, Bennett J (1999) Medication adherence in rheumatoid arthritis patients: older is wiser. J Am Geriatr Soc 47(2):172–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Phillips LH, MacLeod MS, Kliegel M (2005) Adult aging and cognitive planning. In: Morris R, Ward G (eds) The cognitive psychology of planning. Psychology Press, Hove, pp 111–134Google Scholar
  39. Pohjonen T (2001) Perceived work ability of home care workers in relation to individual and work-related factors in different age groups. Occup Med-Oxf 51(3):209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, AustriaGoogle Scholar
  41. Richter P, Hacker W (1998) Belastung und beanspruchung [stress and strain]. Asanger, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  42. Rydrnark I, Wahlberg K, Ghatan PH, Modell S, Nygren A, Ingvar M, Heilig M (2006) Neuroendocrine, cognitive and structural imaging characteristics of women on longterm sick leave with job stress-induced depression. Biol Psychiatr 60(8):867–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Salthouse TA (2009) When does age-related cognitive decline begin? Neurobiol Aging 30(4):507–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Schaie KW (1994) The course of adult intellectual-development. Am Psychol 49(4):304–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schlick CM, Frieling E, Wegge J (2013) Age-differentiated work systems. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schnitzspahn KM, Stahl C, Zeintl M, Kaller CP, Kliegel M (2013) The role of shifting, updating, and inhibition in prospective memory performance in young and older adults. Dev Psychol 49(8):1544–1553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schooler C, Mulatu MS, Oates G (1999) The continuing effects of substantively complex work on the intellectual functioning of older workers. Psychol Aging 14(3):483–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schwarzer R, Luszczynska A (2008) How to overcome health-compromising behaviors—the health action process approach. Eur Psychol 13(2):141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schwarzer R, Lippke S, Ziegelmann JP (2008a) Health action process approach: a research agenda at the Freie Universität Berlin to examine and promote health behavior change. Zeitschrift Für Gesundheitspsychologie 16(3):157–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schwarzer R, Luszczynska A, Ziegelmann JP, Scholz U, Lippke S (2008b) Social-cognitive predictors of physical exercise adherence: three longitudinal studies in rehabilitation. Health Psychol 27(1):S54–S63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Stern Y (2002) What is cognitive reserve? Theory and research application of the reserve concept. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 8(3):448–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sun J, Buys N, Wang XC (2013) Depression in employees in privately owned enterprises in China: is it related to work environment and work ability? Int J Environ Res Public Health 10(4):1152–1167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thomas C (1993) De-constructing concepts of care. Sociology 21(4):649–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tucker AM, Stern Y (2011) Cognitive reserve in aging. Curr Alzheimer Res 8(4):354–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Van der Linden D, Keijsers GPJ, Eling P, Van Schaijk R (2005) Work stress and attentional difficulties: an initial study on burnout and cognitive failures. Work and Stress 19(1):23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wechsler D (1981) Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-revised. Psychological Corporation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. Wendsche J, Hacker W, Wegge J, Schrod N, Roitzsch K, Tomaschek A, Kliegel M (2014) Rest break organization in geriatric care and turnover: a multimethod cross-sectional study. Int J Nurs Stud 51(9):1246–1257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. World Health Organization (1998) Info package: mastering depression in primary care. World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe, Psychiatric Research Unit, FrederiksborgGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Ihle
    • 1
    • 2
  • Erika Borella
    • 3
  • Marlen Rahnfeld
    • 4
  • Sandrine R. Müller
    • 5
  • Sören Enge
    • 4
  • Winfried Hacker
    • 4
  • Jürgen Wegge
    • 4
  • Michel Oris
    • 2
  • Matthias Kliegel
    • 1
  1. 1.Cognitive Aging Lab, Department of PsychologyUniversity of GenevaGeneva 4Switzerland
  2. 2.Center for the Interdisciplinary Study of Gerontology and Vulnerability and NCCR LIVESUniversity of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of General PsychologyUniversity of PaduaPaduaItaly
  4. 4.Department of PsychologyTechnische Universität DresdenDresdenGermany
  5. 5.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations