Advertisement

European Journal of Ageing

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 171–181 | Cite as

Structured ambivalence in grandchild care and the quality of life among European grandparents

  • Franz S. NeubergerEmail author
  • Klaus Haberkern
Original Investigation

Abstract

This study employs the concept of structured ambivalence to analyse the effect of grandchild care on quality of life (QoL) in different cultural contexts. We define structured ambivalence as the contradiction between behaviour and cultural norms. The analysis is based on the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe with 14 countries in the sample. We focus on grandparents aged 50 and over with at least one grandchild 12 years old or younger (n = 12,740). In countries with high grandparent obligations, grandparents who did not look after their grandchildren reported a lower quality of life. Compliance with such grandparental obligations (e.g. providing grandchild care in a country with high grandparent obligations) was found to increase the QoL of grandparents. Family policy should consider family practices that better match the realities of current grandparents’ lives in order to reduce structured ambivalence and increase the QoL of grandparents.

Keywords

Grandchild care Quality of life Structured ambivalence Europe 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper uses data from SHARELIFE release 2.5.0 as of July 29, 2010. The SHARE data collection has been primarily funded by the European Commission through the Fifth Framework Programme (project QLK6-CT-2001-00360 in the thematic programme Quality of Life), through the Sixth Framework Programme (projects SHARE-I3, RII-CT-2006-062193, COMPARE, CIT5-CT-2005-028857, and SHARELIFE, CIT4-CT-2006-028812) and through the Seventh Framework Programme (SHARE-PREP, 211909 and SHARE-LEAP, 227822). Additional funding from the US National Institute on Aging (U01 AG09740-13S2, P01 AG005842, P01 AG08291, P30 AG12815, Y1-AG-4553-01 and OGHA 04-064, IAG BSR06-11, R21 AG025169) as well as from various national sources is gratefully acknowledged (see www.share-project.org for a full list of funding institutions).

Supplementary material

10433_2013_294_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (254 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 254 kb)

References

  1. Bengtson VL (2001) Beyond the nuclear family: the increasing importance of multigenerational bonds. J Marriage Fam 63(1):1–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00001.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bengtson V, Giarrusso R, Mabry JB, Silverstein M (2002) Solidarity, conflict, and ambivalence: complementary or competing perspectives on intergenerational relationships? J Marriage Fam 64(3):568–576. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00568.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Birditt KS, Fingerman KL, Zarit SH (2010) Adult children’s problems and successes: implications for intergenerational ambivalence. J Gerontol B Psychol 65(2):145–153. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbp125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanchflower DG, Oswald AJ (2008) Is well-being U-shaped over the life cycle? Soc Sci Med 66:1733–1749. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.01.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blane D, Netuveli G, Bartley M (2007) Does quality of life at older ages vary with socio-economic position? Sociology 41(4):717–726. doi: 10.1177/0038038507078927 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brandt M, Haberkern K, Szydlik M (2009) Intergenerational help and care in Europe. Eur Sociol Rev 25(5):585–601. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcn076 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Connidis IA, McMullin JA (2002a) Ambivalence, family ties, and doing sociology. J Marriage Fam 64(3):594–601. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00594.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Connidis IA, McMullin JA (2002b) Sociological ambivalence and family ties: a critical perspective. J Marriage Fam 64(3):558–567. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00558.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Gierveld JJ, Dykstra PA (2008) Virtue is its own reward? Support-giving in the family and loneliness in middle and old age. Ageing Soc 28(2):271–287. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X07006629 Google Scholar
  10. Deindl C, Brandt M (2011) Financial support and practical help between older parents and their middle-aged children in Europe. Ageing Soc 31:645–662. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X10001212 Google Scholar
  11. Drew LM, Silverstein M (2004) Inter-generational role investments of great-grandparents: consequences for psychological well-being. Ageing Soc 24:95–111. doi: 10.1017/S0144686X03001533 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Drew LM, Silverstein M (2007) Grandparents’ psychological well-being after loss of contact with their grandchildren. J Fam Psychol 21(3):372–379. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.3.372 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Easterlin RA (2001) Income and happiness: towards a unified theory. Econ J 111(473):465–484. doi: 10.1111/1468-0297.00646 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elster J (1989) The cement of society. A study of social order. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferring D, Michels T, Boll T, Filipp SH (2009) Emotional relationship quality of adult children with ageing parents: on solidarity, conflict and ambivalence. Eur J Ageing 6(4):253–265. doi: 10.1007/s10433-009-0133-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fingerman KL, Pitzer L, Lefkowitz ES, Birditt KS, Mroczek D (2008) Ambivalent relationship qualities between adults and their parents: implications for the well-being of both parties. J Gerontol B Psychol 63(6):362–371. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbp125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fingerman KL, Cheng YP, Birditt K, Zarit S (2012) Only as happy as the least happy child: multiple grown children’s problems and successes and middle-aged parents’ well-being. J Gerontol B Psychol 67(2):184–193. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fuller-Thomson E, Minkler M (2001) American grandparents providing extensive child care to their grandchildren: prevalence and profile. Gerontologist 41(2):201–209. doi: 10.1093/geront/41.2.201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hank K, Buber I (2009) Grandparents caring for their grandchildren. Findings from the 2004 survey of health, ageing, and retirement in Europe. J Fam Issues 30(1):53–73. doi: 10.1177/0192513X08322627 Google Scholar
  20. Hillcoat-Nalletamby S, Phillips JE (2011) Sociological ambivalence revisited. Sociology 45(2):202–217. doi: 10.1177/0038038510394018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hughes M E, Waite L J, LaPierre T A, Luo Y (2007) All in the family: the impact of caring for grandchildren on grandparents’ health. J Gerontol B Psychol 62(2):108–S119Google Scholar
  22. Huijts T, Kraaykamp G, Subramanian SV (2013) Childlessness and psychological well-being in context: a multilevel study on 24 European countries. Eur Sociol Rev 29(1):32–47. doi: 10.1093/esr/jcr037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hyde M, Wiggins RD, Higgs P, Blane DB (2003) A measure of quality of life in early old age: the theory, development and properties of a needs satisfaction model (CASP-19). Aging Ment Health 7(3):186–194. doi: 10.1080/1360786031000101157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Igel C, Szydlik M (2011) Grandchild care and welfare state arrangements in Europe. J Eur Soc Policy 21(3):210–224. doi: 10.1177/0958928711401766 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Isengard B, Szydlik M (2012) Living apart (or) together? Coresidence of elderly parents and their adult children in Europe. Res Aging 34(4):449–474. doi: 10.1177/0164027511428455 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jappens M, van Bavel J (2012) Regional family cultures and child care by grandparents in Europe. DemRes 27:85–120. doi: 10.4054/DemRes.2012.27.4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kiecolt KJ, Blieszner R, Savla J (2011) Long-term influences of intergenerational ambivalence on midlife parents’ psychological well-being. J Marriage Fam 73(2):369–382. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00812.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Litwin H, Sapir EV (2009) Perceived income adequacy among older adults in 12 countries: findings from the survey of health, ageing, and retirement in Europe. Gerontologist 49(3):397–406. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnp036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lowenstein A (2007) Solidarity-conflict and ambivalence: testing two conceptual frameworks and their impact on quality of life for older family members. J Gerontol B Psychol 62(2):100–107. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Luescher K (2002) Intergenerational ambivalence: further steps in theory and research. J Marriage Fam 64(3):585–593. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2002.00585.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Luescher K, Pillemer K (1998) Intergenerational ambivalence: a new approach to the study of parent-child relations in later life. J Marriage Fam 60(2):413–425. doi: 10.2307/353858 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Muller Z, Litwin H (2011) Grandparenting and psychological well-being: how important is grandparent role centrality? Eur J Ageing 8(2):109–118. doi: 10.1007/s10433-011-0185-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Musil CM, Gordon NL, Warner CB, Zauszniewski JA, Standing T, Wykle M (2011) Grandmothers and caregiving to grandchildren: continuity, change, and outcomes over 24 months. Gerontologist 5(1):86–100. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnq061 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Netuveli G, Wiggins RD, Hildon Z, Montgomery SM, Blane D (2006) Quality of life at older ages: evidence from the English longitudinal study of aging (wave 1). J Epidemiol Commun H 60(4):357–363. doi: 10.1136/jech.2005.040071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. OECD (2012) The Future of Families to 2030. OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  36. Pillemer K, Suitor JJ, Mock SE, Sabir M, Pardo TB, Sechrist J (2007) Capturing the complexity of intergenerational relations: exploring ambivalence within later-life families. J Soc Issues 63(4):775–791. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00536.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Silverstein M, Bengtson VL, Lawton L (1997) Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult child parent relationships in American families. Am J Sociol 103(2):429–460. doi: 10.1086/231213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Snijders TA, Bosker RJ (1999) Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Sage Publications Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Steinbach A (2008) Intergenerational solidarity and ambivalence: types of relationships in German families. J Comp Fam Stud 39(1):115+Google Scholar
  40. Suitor JJ, Gilligan M, Pillemer K (2011) Conceptualizing and measuring intergenerational ambivalence in later life. J Gerontol B Psychol 66(6):769–781. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbr108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Uchino BN, Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TW, Bloor L (2004) Heterogeneity in social networks: a comparison of different models linking relationships to psychological outcomes. J Soc Clin Psychol 23:123–139. doi: 10.1521/jscp.23.2.123.31014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van Gaalen RI, Dykstra PA, Komter AE (2010) Where is the exit? Intergenerational ambivalence and relationship quality in high contact ties. J Aging Stud 24:105–114. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2008.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ward RA, Spitze G, Deane G (2009) The more the merrier? Multiple parent-adult child relations. J Marriage Fam 71:161–173. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-3737.2008.00587.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Willson AE, Shuey KM, Elder JGH (2006) Ambivalence in mother-adult child relations: a dyadic analysis. Soc Psychol Quart 69:235–252. doi: 10.1177/019027250606900302 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of SociologyZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations