Advertisement

European Journal of Ageing

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 293–300 | Cite as

Predicting one’s own death: the relationship between subjective and objective nearness to death in very old age

  • Dana Kotter-GrühnEmail author
  • Daniel Grühn
  • Jacqui Smith
Original Investigation

Abstract

Previous research found that the perception of a limited remaining lifetime is related to goal setting, social network composition, attitudes, and behavior. However, to better understand those findings, it is important to know if this subjective perception of being close to death corresponds with the time a person actually survives. The aim of the present study was to examine the predictive and time–dynamic relationship between subjective and objective nearness to death using 16-year longitudinal data from the Berlin Aging Study (Baltes and Mayer 1999; N = 516 older adults between 70 and 104 years). Older adults who felt close to death at the first measurement occasion were more likely to die over the following 16 years than persons who did not report feeling close to dying. Results of multilevel analyses revealed that there was a time–dynamic relationship such that subjective nearness to death increased as a function of objective nearness to death. Our results indicate that very old adults seem to have quite accurate perceptions of their nearness to death.

Keywords

Subjective nearness to death Future time perspective Berlin aging study Mortality 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This article reports data from the Berlin Aging Study (BASE; www.base-berlin.mpg.de). BASE was initiated by the late Paul B. Baltes, in collaboration with Hanfried Helmchen, Psychiatry, Elisabeth Steinhagen-Thiessen, Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, and Karl Ulrich Mayer, Sociology. Financial support came from the Max Planck Society, the Free University of Berlin, the German Federal Ministry for Research and Technology (1989–1991, 13 TA 011 + 13 TA 011/A), the German Federal Ministry for Family, Senior Citizens, Women, and Youth (1992–1998, 314-1722-102/9 + 314-1722-102/9a), and the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences’ Research Group on Aging and Societal Development (1994–1999). During preparation of this article, Dana Kotter-Grühn was supported by a research fellowship (KO 3579/3-1) awarded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft/German Research Foundation (DFG). We thank the anonymous reviewers for very useful comments on a previous draft.

References

  1. Baltes PB, Mayer KU (eds) (1999) The Berlin aging study: aging from 70 to 100. Cambridge University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  2. Baltes PB, Smith J (2003) New frontiers in the future of aging: from successful aging of the young old to the dilemmas of the fourth age. Gerontology 49:123–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baltes MM, Freund AM, Horgas SL (1999) Men and women in the Berlin Aging Study. In: Baltes PB, Mayer KU (eds) The Berlin Aging Study: aging from 70 to 100. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 259–281Google Scholar
  4. Bosworth HB, Schaie KW, Willis SL, Siegler IC (1999) Age and distance to death in the Seattle Longitudinal Study. Res Aging 21:723–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brandtstädter J, Rothermund K (2003) Intentionality and time in human development and aging:compensation and goal adjustment in changing developmental contexts. In: Staudinger UM, Lindenberger U (eds) Understanding human development: dialogues with lifespan psychology. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 105–124Google Scholar
  6. Brandtstädter J, Rothermund K, Kranz D, Kühn W (2010) Final decentrations: personal goals, rationality perspectives, and the awareness of life’s finitude. Eur Psychol 15:152–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carstensen LL (2006) The influence of a sense of time on human development. Science 312:1913–1915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chida Y, Steptoe A (2008) Positive psychological well-being and mortality: a quantitative review of prospective observational studies. Psychosom Med 70:741–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gerstorf D, Ram N, Röcke C, Lindenberger U, Smith J (2008) Decline in life satisfaction in old age: longitudinal evidence for links to distance-to-death. Psychol Aging 23:154–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldenberg JL, Arndt J (2008) The implications of death for health: a terror management model for behavioral health promotion. Psychol Rev 115:1032–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenberg J, Pyszczynski T, Solomon S, Rosenblatt A, Veeder M, Kirkland S et al (1990) Evidence for terror management theory II: the effects of mortality salience on reactions to those who threaten or bolster the cultural worldview. J Pers Soc Psychol 58:308–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hurd MD, McGarry K (2002) The predictive validity of subjective probabilities of survival. Econ J 112:966–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Idler EL, Benyamini Y (1997) Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav 38:21–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jopp D, Rott C, Oswald F (2008) Valuation of life in old and very old age: the role of sociodemographic, social, and health resources for positive adaptation. The Gerontologist 48:646–658Google Scholar
  15. King LA, Hicks JA, Abdelkhalik J (2009) Death, life, scarcity, and value: an alternative perspective on the meaning of death. Psychol Sci 20(12):1459–1462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kotter-Grühn D, Kleinspehn-Ammerlahn A, Gerstorf D, Smith J (2009) Self-perceptions of aging predict mortality and change with approaching death: 16-year longitudinal results from the Berlin Aging Study. Psychol Aging 24:654–667CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lang FR (2000) Endings and continuity of social relationships: maximizing intrinsic benefits within personal networks when feeling near to death. J Soc Pers Relationsh 17:155–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lang FR, Carstensen LL (2002) Time counts: future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychol Aging 17:125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lang FR, Baltes PB, Wagner GG (2007) Desired lifetime and end-of-life desires across adulthood from 20 to 90: a dual-source information model. J Gerontol Psychol Sci 62B:P268–P276Google Scholar
  20. Lawton MP, Moss M, Hoffman C, Kleban MH, Ruckdeschel K, Winter L (2001) Valuation of life: a concept and a scale. J Aging Health 13:3–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lawton MP, Moss MS, Winter L, Hoffman C (2002) Motivation in later life: personal projects and well-being. Psychol Aging 17:539–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lindenberger U, Baltes PB (1997) Intellectual functioning in old and very old age: cross-sectional results from the Berlin Aging Study. Psychol Aging 12:410–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Littell RC, Miliken GA, Stoup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS systems for mixed models. SAS Institute, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  24. Little RJA, Rubin DB (2002) Statistical analysis with missing data. Wiley, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  25. Martens A, Greenberg J, Schimel J, Landau M (2004) Ageism and death: effects of mortality salience and perceived similarity to elders on reactions to elderly people. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 30:1524–1536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maxfield M, Pyszczynski T, Kluck B, Cox C, Greenberg J, Solomon S et al (2007) Age-related differences in responses to thoughts of one’s own death: mortality salience and judgements of moral transgressions. Psychol Aging 22:341–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mayer KU, Maas I, Wagner M (1999) Socioeconomic conditions and social inequalities in old age. In: Baltes PB, Mayer KU (eds) The Berlin Aging Study: aging from 70 to 100. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 227–255Google Scholar
  28. Mirowsky J (1997) Age, subjective life expectancy, and the sense of control: the horizon hypothesis. J Gerontol Soc Sci 52B:S125–S134Google Scholar
  29. Mirowsky J (1999) Subjective life expectancy in the US: correspondence to actuarial estimates by age, sex, and race. Soc Sci Med 49:967–979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mroczek DK, Spiro A III (2007) Personality change influences mortality in older men. Psychol Sci 18:371–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Neimeyer RA, Wittkowski J, Moser R (2004) Psychological research on death attitudes: an overview and evaluation. Death Stud 28:309–340Google Scholar
  32. Pyszczynski T, Greenberg J, Solomon S, Arndt J, Schimel J (2004) Why do people need self-esteem? A theoretical and empirical review. Psychol Bull 130:435–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schafer J, Graham J (2002) Missing data: our view of the state of the art. Psychol Methods 7:147–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Seligman MEP (2000) Optimism, pessimism, and mortality. Mayo Clin Proc 75:133–134Google Scholar
  35. Smith J, Delius JAM (2010) Längsschnittliche Datenerhebungen der Berliner Altersstudie (BASE). Studiendesign, Stichproben und Forschungsthemen 1990–2009 [Longitudinal data collections of the Berlin Aging Study: Design, samples, and research topics 1990–2009]. In: Lindenberger U, Smith J, Mayer KU, Baltes PB (eds) Die Berliner Altersstudie, 3rd edn. Akademie Verlag, Berlin, pp 113–131Google Scholar
  36. Smith VK, Taylor DH Jr, Sloan FA (2001) Longevity expectations and death: can people predict their own demise? Am Econ Rev 91:1126–1134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Steinhagen-Thiessen E, Borchelt M (1999) Morbidity, medication, and functional limitations in very old age. In: Baltes PB, Mayer KU (eds) The Berlin aging study: aging from 70 to 100. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, pp 131–166Google Scholar
  38. van Doorn C, Kasl SV (1998) Can parental longevity and self-rated life expectancy predict mortality among older persons? Results from an Australian cohort. J Gerontol Soc Sci 53B:S28–S34Google Scholar
  39. Ziegelmann JP, Lippke S, Schwarzer R (2006) Subjective residual life expectancy in health self-regulation. J Gerontol Psychol Sci 61B:P195–P201Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dana Kotter-Grühn
    • 1
    Email author
  • Daniel Grühn
    • 1
  • Jacqui Smith
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychology and Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of MichiganAnn ArborUSA 
  3. 3.Center for Lifespan PsychologyMax Planck Institute for Human DevelopmentBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations