Advertisement

European Journal of Ageing

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 111–119 | Cite as

Counselling for dementia caregivers—predictors for utilization and expected quality from a family caregiver’s point of view

  • Elmar GräßelEmail author
  • Katharina Luttenberger
  • Angelika Trilling
  • Carolin Donath
Original Investigation

Abstract

Caregiver counselling has proved to be effective in reducing the burden of family caregivers of dementia patients. Nevertheless, little is known about the influencing factors for utilization and quality expectations of family caregivers. In this article, we address the following questions on the theoretical base of the Andersen/Newman model: Which variables of the care situation, the caregivers and their attitudes act as predictors for the utilization of caregiver counselling? What are the views of caregivers about the quality of caregiver counselling? The cross-sectional study was carried out as an anonymous written survey of family caregivers of dementia patients in four regions, both urban and rural, of Germany. Quantitative and qualitative data from 404 family caregivers were analysed using binary logistic regression analysis and qualitative content analysis, respectively. The only significant predictor for utilization is the assessment of how helpful caregiver counselling is for the individual care situation. In the sensitivity analysis ‘accessibility of caregiver counselling’ was additionally predictive for usage. Family caregivers most frequently expressed a wish for advice about further ‘support offers’ by qualified counsellors. In order to increase the rate of utilization, family caregivers must be convinced of the relevant advantages of using caregiver counselling. Counselling services should provide information about further support offers and give practical help in filling out application forms.

Keywords

Caregiver counselling Dementia Family caregiver Utilization Quality 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the family caregivers who contributed to the success of this study by giving their opinions. The staff of the regional offices of the Alzheimer’s Society, other caregiver counselling services and the Medical Services of the Health Insurance companies are also thanked for their kind help in distributing the questionnaires. A special thank to Ms H. Römer (Alzheimer’s Society Dortmund) and Ms A. Winkler (Alzheimer’s Society Brandenburg) and the Alzheimer’s Society Mittelfranken for their support and particularly the German Alzheimer’s Society for awarding us the Research prize that allowed us to carry out this study.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that no conflicts of interests exist.

References

  1. Andersen RM (1995) Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav 36:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersen RM, Newman JF (1973) Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States. Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc 51:95–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brodaty H, Thomson C, Thompson C, Fine M (2005) Why caregivers of people with dementia and memory loss don’t use services. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 20:537–546. doi: 10.1002/gps.1322 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chodosh J, Mittman B, Connor C et al (2007) Caring for patients with dementia: How good is the quality of care? Results from three health systems. J Am Geriatr Soc 55:1260–1268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colantonio A, Kositsky A, Cohen C, Vernich L (2001) What support do caregivers of elderly want? Results from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. Can J Public Health 92:376–379Google Scholar
  6. Cooke D, McNally L, Mulligan K, Harrison M, Newman S (2001) Psychosocial interventions for caregivers of people with dementia: a systematic review. Aging Ment Health 5:120–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. dello Buono M, Busato R, Mazzetto M et al (1999) Community care for patients with Alzheimer’s disease and non-demented elderly people: use and satisfaction with services and unmet needs in family caregivers. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 14:915–924. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(199911)14:11<915:AID-GPS36>3.0.CO;2-H CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deutsche Alzheimer Gesellschaft (DAlzG, German Alzheimer’s Society) (2001). Das Wichtigste über die Alzheimer-Krankheit [The most important facts about Alzheimer’s disease]. Schriftenreihe der Deutschen Alzheimer Gesellschaft eV, Berlin: Deutsche Alzheimer Gesellschaft e.VGoogle Scholar
  9. Donabedian A (1966) Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q 44:166–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fairbairn A, Gould N, Kendall T for National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2006) Dementia: supporting people with dementia and their carers in health and social care. NICE clinical guideline, 42. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, Social Care Institute for Excellence, London. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia/pdf/CG042NICEGuideline.pdf
  11. Gallagher-Thompson D, Coon D (2007) Evidence-based psychological treatments for distress in family caregivers of older adults. Psychol Aging 22:37–51. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.22.1.37 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Georges J, Jansen S, Jackson J et al (2008) Alzheimer’s disease in real life—the dementia carer’s survey. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 23:546–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gill C, Hinrichsen G, DiGiuseppe R (1998) Factors associated with formal service use by family members of patients with dementia. J Appl Gerontol 17:38–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gräßel E (2002) When home care ends—changes in the physical health of informal caregivers caring for dementia patients: a longitudinal study. J Am Geriatr Soc 50:843–849. doi: 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50209.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gräßel E, Wiltfang J, Kornhuber J (2003) Non-drug therapies for dementia: an overview of the current situation with regard to proof of effectiveness. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 15:115–125. doi: 10.1159/000068477 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holle R, Gräßel E, Ruckdäschel S et al (2009) Dementia care initiative in primary practice—study protocol of a cluster randomized trial on dementia management in a general practice setting. BMC Health Serv Res 9:91. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-9-91
  17. Ibach B, Koch H, Koller H, Hajak G, Putzhammer A (2004) Die Situation der Angehörigenberatung bei Patienten mit frontotemporaler lobärer Demenz in der Gerontopsychiatrie [The situation of caregiver counselling in patients with frontotemporal lobar dementia in old psychiatry]. Psychiatr Prax 31:120–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kosloski K, Montgomery R (1993) Perceptions of respite services as predictors of utilization. Res Aging 15:399–413. doi: 10.1177/0164027593154002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lamura G, Mnich E, Wojszel B et al (2006) Erfahrungen von pflegenden Angehörigen älterer Menschen in Europa bei der Inanspruchnahme von Unterstützungsleistungen: Ausgewählte Ergebnisse des Projektes EUROFAMCARE [The experience of family carers of older people in the use of support services in Europe: selected findings from the EUROFAMCARE project]. Z Gerontol Geriatr 39:429–442. doi: 10.1007/s00391-006-0416-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mahoney F, Tarlow B, Jones R, Tennstedt S, Kasten L (2001) Factors affecting the use of a telephone-based intervention for caregivers of people with Alzheimer’s disease. J Telemed Telecare 7:139–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mayring P (1993) Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung [Introduction into research in social sciences]. Psychologie Verlags Union, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
  22. Morgan D (1993) Qualitative content analysis: a guide to paths not taken. Qual Health Res 3:112–121. doi: 10.1177/104973239300300107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Philip I, Ghosh U (1992) Community care services: views of patients attending a geriatric day hospital. Health Bull 50:296–301Google Scholar
  24. Pinquart M, Sörensen S (2006) Helping caregivers of persons with dementia: which interventions work and how large are their effects? Int Psychogeriatr 18:577–595. doi: 10.1017/S1041610206003462 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Selwood A, Johnston K, Katona C, Lyketsos C, Livingston G (2007) Systematic review of the effect of psychological interventions on family caregivers of people with dementia. J Affect Disord 101:75–89. doi: 10/1016/j.jad.2006.10.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sörensen S, Pinquart M, Duberstein P (2002) How effective are interventions with caregivers? An updated meta-analysis. Gerontologist 42:356–372Google Scholar
  27. Spijker A, Verhey F, Graff M et al (2009) Systematic care for caregivers of people with dementia in the ambulatory mental health service: designing a multicentre, cluster, randomized, controlled trial. BMC Geriatr 9. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-9-21
  28. Thompson C, Spilsbury K, Hall J et al (2007) Systematic review of information and support interventions for caregivers of people with dementia. BMC Geriatr 7(18). http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2318/7/18
  29. Toseland R, McCallion P, Gerber T et al (1999) Use of health and human services by community-residing people with dementia. Soc Work 44:535–548Google Scholar
  30. Toseland R, McCallion P, Gerber T, Banks S (2002) Predictors of health and human services use by persons with dementia and their family caregivers. Soc Sci Med 55:1255–1266. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00240-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Winslow B (2003) Family caregivers’ experiences with community services: a qualitative analysis. Public Health Nurs 20:341–348. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1446.2003.20502.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elmar Gräßel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Katharina Luttenberger
    • 1
  • Angelika Trilling
    • 2
  • Carolin Donath
    • 1
  1. 1.Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Clinic for Psychiatry and PsychotherapyErlangen University HospitalErlangenGermany
  2. 2.Department of Social ServicesKasselGermany

Personalised recommendations