Advertisement

European Journal of Ageing

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 177–189 | Cite as

Negotiating and effectuating relocation to sheltered housing in old age: a Swedish study over 11 years

  • Carita Nygren
  • Susanne Iwarsson
Original Investigation

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore how very old people consider and arrive at decisions on relocation, with specific attention to housing and health relationships during the process of ageing. The sample included 13 very old participants of an 11-year longitudinal study of relationships between housing and health. Applying a mixed-methods approach, data from qualitative interviews and quantitative survey data from three data collection waves were utilised. The quantitative data were interwoven with the qualitative findings into a coherent body of text. The core theme “Negotiating and effectuating relocation is a long process” indicates a non-linear process consisting of five phases constituting the main categories of our findings. In the first phase, some informants considered relocation while others avoided thinking about it. Next, relations between health and home changed and led to turning points triggering relocation, i.e. when dependence in everyday activities reached critical points or when sudden illness forced an involuntary move. In the third phase, once the decision to relocate was made it was set in stone by the individual, but often questioned by the authorities, leading to a situation causing much frustration. While waiting for the relocation, doubts as well as expectations about the new home were expressed. Finally, even though the actual move caused different feelings, it was most often a positive experience and resulted in subjective health improvement and increased social contacts. The results can be used for the development of positive, proactive strategies for improved housing provision along the ageing process.

Keywords

Relocation process Housing Health Qualitative data Quantitative data Mixed methods 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to G. Wilson, MSc, reg. occupational therapist, for data collection and to research engineer B. Slaug, BA, for running computations. We would like to thank ass. Prof. L. Hounsgaard for contributing to the validity and trustworthiness of our findings. This project was supported by grants from the Kristianstad County Council, the Swedish Federation of County Councils, the Council for Medical Health Care Research in South Sweden, the Swedish Council for Working Life and Social Research, and the Swedish Research Council. This paper was prepared within the context of the Centre for Ageing and Supportive Environments (CASE) at Lund University, financed by the Swedish Research Council for Working Life and Social Research.

References

  1. Allardt E (1990) Challenges for comparative research. Acta Sociologica 3:183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson I, Pettersson E, Sidenvall B (2007) Daily life after moving into a care home—experiences from older people, relatives and contact persons. J Clin Nursing 16:1712–1718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baltes PM, Smith J (1999) Multilevel and systemic analysis of old age: theoretical and empirical evidence for a fourth age. In: Bentson VL, Schaie KW (eds) Handbook of theories of ageing. Springer, New York, pp 153–173Google Scholar
  4. Batljan I, Lagergren M (2005) Future demand for formal long-term care in Sweden. Eur J Ageing 2:216–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bharucha AJ, Pandav R, Shen C, Dodge DD, Ganguli M (2004) Predictors of nursing facility admission: a 12-year epidemiological study in the United States. J Am Geriatr Soc 52:434–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blackman T (2000) Defining responsibility for care: approaches to the care of older people in six European countries. Int J Social Welf 9:181–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castle NG (2001) Relocation of the elderly. Med Care Res Rev 58:291–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheek J, Ballantyne A, Byers L, Quan J (2006) From retirement villages to residential care: what older people and their families say. Health Soc Care Community 15:8–17Google Scholar
  9. Chen P-C, Wilmoth JM (2004) The effects of residential mobility on ADL and IADL limitations among the very old living in the community. J Gerontol Soc Sci 59B:S164–S172Google Scholar
  10. Dahlin Ivanoff S, Iwarsson S, Sonn U (2006) Occupational therapy research on assistive technology and physical environmental issues—a literature review. Can J Occup Ther 73:109–119Google Scholar
  11. Fänge A, Dahlin Ivanoff S (2009) The home is the hub of health in very old age: findings from the ENABLE-AGE Project. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 48:340–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferring D, Horstmann V (2007) Still the same and better of than others? Social and temporal comparisons in old age. Eur J Ageing 4:23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fries JF (2002) Successful ageing—an emerging paradigm of gerontology. Clin Geriatr Med 18:371–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frieswijk N, Buunk BP, Steverink N, Slaets JPJ (2004) The interpretation of social comparisons and its relation to life satisfaction among elderly people: Does frailty make a difference? J Gerontol Psychol Sci B 59:P250–P257Google Scholar
  15. Haak M, Fänge A, Iwarsson S, Dahlin Ivanoff S (2007) Home as a signification of independence an autonomy: experiences among very old Swedish people. Scand J Occup Ther 14:16–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Iwarsson S (2005) A long-term perspective on person-environment fit and ADL dependence among older Swedish adults. Gerontologist 45:327–336Google Scholar
  17. Iwarsson S, Isacsson Å (1996) Housing standards, environmental barriers in the home, and subjective general apprehension of housing situation among the rural elderly. Scand J Occup Ther 3(2):52–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Iwarsson S, Slaug B (2001) The Housing Enabler. An instrument for assessing and analysing accessibility problems in housing. Veten & Skapen HB & Slaug Data Management, Nävlinge and Staffanstorp, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  19. Iwarsson S, Isacsson Å, Lanke J (1998) ADL dependence in the elderly: the influence of functional limitations and physical environmental demand. Occup Ther Int 5:173–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Iwarsson S, Wahl H-W, Nygren C, Oswald F, Sixsmith A, Sixsmith J, Széman Z, Tomsone S (2007) Importance of the home environment for healthy ageing: Methodological background of the ENABLE-AGE Project. Gerontologist 47:78–84Google Scholar
  21. Kane RA, Chan J, Kane RL (2007) Assisted living literature through May 2004: Taking stock. Gerontologist 47:125–140Google Scholar
  22. Kvale S (1996) Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications, USAGoogle Scholar
  23. Larsson K, Thorslund M, Kåreholt I (2006) Are public care and services for older people targeted according to need? Applying the behavioural model on longitudinal data of a Swedish urban older population. Eur J Ageing 3:22–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lawton MP, Nahemow L (1973) Ecology and the aging process. In: Eisdorfer C, Lawton MP (eds) Psychology of adult development and aging. American Psychological Association, Washington DC, pp 619–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  26. National Board of Health and Welfare, S (2007) Official statistics on health and social care for the elderly. Available (13-12-2007) at: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/Statistik/statistikdatabas/index.htm.
  27. Nuotio M, Tammela TL, Luukaala T, Jylha M (2003) Predictors of institutionalization in an older population during a 13-year period: the effect of urge incontinence. J Gerontol Med Sci 58A:756–762Google Scholar
  28. Onwuegbuzie AJ, Johnson RB (2008) The validity issue in mixed research. In: Plano Clark VL, Creswell JW (eds) The mixed methods reader. Sage Publications, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  29. Oswald F, Rowles G (2007) Beyond the relocation trauma in old age: New trends in elders’ residential decisions. In: Wahl H-W, Tesch-Römer C, Hoff A (eds) New dynamics in old age: Individual, environmental and societal perspectives. Baywood Publishing Company, Inc, Amityville, pp 127–152Google Scholar
  30. Oswald F, Wahl H-W, Schilling O, Nygren C, Fänge A, Sixsmith A, Sixsmith J, Széman Z, Tomsone S, Iwarsson S (2007) Relationships between housing and healthy aging in very old age. Gerontologist 47:96–107Google Scholar
  31. Phillipson C, Scharf T (2005) Rural and urban perspectives on growing old: developing a new research agenda. Eur J Ageing 2:67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Plano Clark VL, Creswell JW (2008) The mixed method reader. Sage Publications, USAGoogle Scholar
  33. Puts MTE, Lips P, Ribbe MW, Deeg DJ (2005) The effect of frailty on residential/nursing home admission in the Netherlands independent of chronic diseases and functional limitations. Eu J Ageing 2:264–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reed J, Cook G, Sullivan A, Burridge C (2003) Making a move: care-home residents’ experiences of relocation. Aging Soc 23:225–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rossen EK, Knafl KA (2003) Older women’s response to residential relocation: description of transition styles. Qual Health Res 13:20–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rubinstein RL, De Medeiores K (2003) Ecology and the ageing self. In: Wahl H-W, Scheidt RJ, Windely PG (eds) Ageing in context: socio-physical environments. Springer, New York, pp 59–84Google Scholar
  37. Sonn U, Hulter-Åsberg K (1991) Assessment of activities of daily living in the elderly. Scand J Rehabil Med 23:193–202Google Scholar
  38. Svidén G, Wikström M, Hjortsjö-Norberg M (2002) Elderly persons’ reflections on relocating to living at sheltered housing. Scand J Occup Ther 9:10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thomése F, Broese van Groenou M (2006) Adaptive strategies after health decline in later life: increasing the person-environment fit by adjusting to the social and physical environment. Eur J Ageing 3:169–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tibblin G, Tibblin B, Peciva S, Kullman S, Svärdsudd K (1990) “The Göteborg Quality of Life Instrument”—an assessment of well-being and symptoms among men born 1913 and 1923. Scand J Prim Health Care Suppl 1(8):33–38Google Scholar
  41. Tomiak M, Berthelot JM, Guimond E, Mustard CA (2000) Factors associated with nursing-home entry for elders in Manitoba, Canada. J Gerontol Med Sci 55A:M279–M287Google Scholar
  42. Werngren-Elgström M, Carlsson G, Iwarsson S (2008) Person-environmental fit and ADL dependence among older Swedish adults—a 10-year follow-up. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research (in press)Google Scholar
  43. WHO (2002) WHO [On-line]. Available (12-12-2007) at: http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/active/en/

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of MedicineLund UniversityLundSweden
  2. 2.Institute of Public HealthUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdense CDenmark

Personalised recommendations