Advertisement

European Journal of Ageing

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 67–78 | Cite as

Welfare states and quality of later life: distributions and predictions in a comparative perspective

  • Andreas Motel-KlingebielEmail author
  • Laura Romeu Gordo
  • Jörg Betzin
Original Investigation

Abstract

Demographic transitions are a driver of social change and societal ageing influences the resources and chances in life of different age groups. As a contribution to the debate on (potential) results of the transformation of social security in ageing societies, the impact of social security systems on distributions of quality of life in later life is discussed. Quality of life is introduced as a helpful concept to answer the paper’s research questions: How are levels of quality of life in later life and the variability of objective and subjective quality of life indicators related to welfare state arrangements? What is the relevance of social structure indicators for this variability, how is it related to old age security, and what can be learned for the perspectives of current debates on equity and social security reforms? In a comparative perspective employing Esping-Andersen’s welfare regime typology, three basic hypotheses are thoroughly tested: the ‘hypothesis of (relative) levels’, the ‘distribution hypothesis’ and the ‘social structure hypothesis’. The analyses apply micro data from ten countries. While most of them are included in the first wave of the international comparative research project SHARE, data for England come from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Descriptive analyses as well as multivariate models prove an interconnection between welfare state systems and quality of life indicators but not all three hypotheses can be fully confirmed. Social policy implications of these findings are discussed and a basis for extended future analyses is outlined.

Keywords

Later life Social gerontology Social inequality Quality of life International comparisons 

References

  1. Allardt E (1975) Dimensions of Welfare in a Comparative Scandinavian study. Research Group for Comparative Sociology: Research reports, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson AB (1983) The economics of inequality. Clarendon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  3. Bäcker G, Koch A (2003) Die Jungen als Verlierer? Alterssicherung und Generationengerechtigkeit. WSI-Mitteilungen(2):111–117Google Scholar
  4. Banks J, Breeze E, Lessof C, Nazroo J (2006) Retirement, health and relationships of the older population in England: THE 2004 English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (Wave 2). London, Institute for Fiscal StudiesGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker GS, Philipson TJ, Soares RR (2005) The quantity and quality of life and the evolution of world inequality. Am Econ Rev 95:277–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blane D, Higgs P, Hyde M, Wiggins RD (2004) Life course influences on quality of life in early old age. Soc Sci Med 58(11):2171–2179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blane D, Netuveli G, Bartley M (2007) Does quality of life at older ages vary with socio-economic position? Sociology 41(4):717–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bolte KM, Kappe D, Neidhardt F (1975) Soziale Ungleichheit. Leske + Budrich, OpladenGoogle Scholar
  9. Bommier A, Lee R, Miller T, Zuber S (2004) Who wins and who loses? public transfer accounts for US generations Born 1850 to 2090 (No. NBER Working Paper No. w10969). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  10. Börsch-Supan A, Jürges H (eds) (2005) The survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe, methodology. Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging, MannheimGoogle Scholar
  11. Börsch-Supan A, Brugiavini A, Jürges H, Mackenbach J, Siegrist J, Weber G (eds) (2005a) Health, ageing and retirement in Europe. First Results from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe. Mannheim Research Institute for the Economics of Aging, MannheimGoogle Scholar
  12. Börsch-Supan A, Hank K, Jürges H (2005b) A new comprehensive and international view on ageing: introducing the “survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe”. Eur J Ageing 2:245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Buhmann B, Rainwater L, Schmaus G, Smeeding TM (1988) Equivalence scales, well-being, inequality and poverty—sensitivity estimates across ten countries using the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) Database. Rev Income Wealth 34:115–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bulmahn T (2000) Zur Entwicklung der Lebensqualität im vereinten Deutschland. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte B40/2000(B40):30–38Google Scholar
  15. Campbell A, Converse PE, Rogers WL (1976) The quality of American life. Sage, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Clasen J, Oorschot Wv (2002) Changing Principles in European Security. Paper presented at the 2nd COST A15 Conference “Welfare Reforms for the 21st Century”, Oslo, 5–6 April 2002Google Scholar
  17. Daatland SO, Motel-Klingebiel A (2007) Separating the local and the general in cross-cultural aging research. In: Wahl H-W, Tesch-Römer C, Hoff A (eds) New dynamics in old age: individual, environmental and societal perspectives. Baywood, Amityville, pp 343–359Google Scholar
  18. Diener E (2000) Subjective well-being. Am Psychol 55:34–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diener E, Suh EM (1998) Age and subjective well-being: an international analysis. In: Powell KWSLM (ed) Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics, vol 17: focus on emotion and adult development. Springer, New York, pp 304–324Google Scholar
  20. Diener E, Suh EM (1999) National differences in subjective well-being. In: Kahnemann D, Diener E, Schwarz N (eds) Well-being: the foundations of hedonic psychology. Sage, New York, pp 434–450Google Scholar
  21. Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, Smith HL (1999) Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychol Bull 125:276–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Easterlin RA (1987) The new age structure of poverty in America: permanent or transient? Popul Dev Rev 13:195–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Erikson R (1974) Welfare as a planning goal. Acta Sociol 17:273–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Esping-Andersen G (1990) The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  25. Esping-Andersen G (1999) Social foundations of post-industrial economies. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Estes CL, Linkins KW, Binney EA (1996) The political economy of aging. In: Binstock RH, George LK (eds) Handbook of aging and the social sciences, 4th edn. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 346–361Google Scholar
  27. Fahey T, Smyth E (2004) Do subjective indicators measure welfare? Eur Soc 6:5–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fahrmeir L, Hamerle A, Tutz G (eds) (1996) Multivariate statistische Verfahren. de Gruyter, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  29. Figini P (1998) Inequality measures, equivalence scales and adjustment for household size and composition (Working Paper No. 185). Luxembourg Income Study, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  30. Ganzeboom HB, Treiman DJ (1996) Internationally comparable measures of occupational status for the 1988 international standard classification of occupations. Soc Sci Res 25:201–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gelman A, Hill J (2007) Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  32. George LK (2006) Perceived quality of life. In: Binstock RH, George LK (eds) Handbook of aging and the social sciences, 6th edn edn. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 320–336Google Scholar
  33. Gujarati DN (1995) Basic econometrics. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Knesebeck OVD, Wahrendorf M, Hyde M, Siegrist J (2007) Socio-economic position and quality of life among older people in 10 European countries: results of the SHARE study. Ageing Soc 27(02):269–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kohli M (1985) Die Institutionalisierung des Lebenslaufs - Historische Befunde und theoretische Argumente. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 37:1–29Google Scholar
  36. Kohli M (1990) Das Alter als Herausforderung an die Theorie sozialer Ungleichheit. In: Berger PA, Hradil S (eds) Lebenslagen, Lebensläufe, Lebensstile. Soziale Welt, Sonderband 7. Schwartz, Göttingen, pp 387–408Google Scholar
  37. Kreckel R (1992) Politische Soziologie der sozialen Ungleichheit. Campus, Frankfurt/M., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Lowenstein A, Ogg J (eds) (2003) OASIS–old age and autonomy: the role of service systems and intergenerational family solidarity. Final Report, http://www.dza.de/forschung/oasis_report.pdf. University of Haifa, Haifa
  39. Lowenstein A, Katz R, Mehlhausen-Hassoen D, Prilutzky D (2002) The research instruments in the OASIS project—old age and autonomy: the role of service systems and intergenerational family solidarity. The Center for Research and Study of Aging—The Faculty for Welfare and Health Studies. University of Haifa, HaifaGoogle Scholar
  40. Marmot M, Banks J, Blundell R, Lessof C, Nazroo J (2002) Health, wealth and lifestyles of the older population in England: the 2002 English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Institute for Fiscal Studies, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Motel-Klingebiel A (2004) Quality of life and social inequality in old age. In: Daatland SO, Biggs S (eds) Ageing and diversity: multiple pathways in later life. Policy Press, Bristol, pp 189–205Google Scholar
  42. Motel-Klingebiel A (2007) Quality of life in old age, inequality and welfare state reform. Empirical comparisons between Norway, Germany and England. In: Mollenkopf H, Walker A (eds) Quality of life in old age. Kluwer, Boston, pp 85–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Motel-Klingebiel A (2008) Alter(n) zwischen Familie und sozialstaatlicher Sicherung im gesellschaftlichen Kontext (Habilitation). Hochschule Vechta, VechtaGoogle Scholar
  44. Motel-Klingebiel A, Arber S (2006) Population ageing, genders and generations—guest editorial. Int J Ageing Later Life 1:3–5Google Scholar
  45. Motel-Klingebiel A, Tesch-Römer C, von Kondratowitz H-J (2003a) The quantitative survey. In: Lowenstein A, Ogg J (eds) OASIS–old age and autonomy: the role of service systems and intergenerational family solidarity. Final Report, http://www.dza.de/forschung/oasis_report.pdf. Haifa University, Haifa, pp 61–97
  46. Motel-Klingebiel A, Tesch-Römer C, von Kondratowitz H-J (2003b) The role of family for quality of life in old age—a comparative perspective. In: Bengtson VL, Lowenstein A (eds) Global aging and challenges to families. de Gruyter, New York, pp 327–354Google Scholar
  47. Motel-Klingebiel A, von Kondratowitz H-J, Tesch-Römer C (2004) Social inequality in the later life: cross-national comparison of quality of life. J Solid State Electrochem 1:6–14Google Scholar
  48. Navarro V (2002) The political economy of social inequalities. Consequences for health and quality of life. Baywood, AmityvilleGoogle Scholar
  49. Noll H-H (1999) Konzepte der Wohlfahrtsentwicklung: Lebensqualität und “neue” Wohlfahrtskonzepte (EuReporting Working Paper No. 3). Mannheim, ZUMA, Project “Towards a European System of Social reporting and Welfare Measurement”, Subproject “European System of Social Indicators”Google Scholar
  50. Noll H-H, Schöb A (2002) Lebensqualität im Alter. In Deutsches Zentrum für Altersfragen (ed) Das hohe Alter - Konzepte, Forschungsfelder, Lebensqualität. Expertisen zum Vierten Altenbericht der Bundesregierung, Band 1. Vincentz, Hannover, pp 229–313Google Scholar
  51. Preston SH (1984) Children and the elderly: divergent paths for America’s dependents. Demography 21:357–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Price D, Ginn J (2003) Sharing the crust. Gender, partnership status and inequalities in pension accumulation. In: Arber S, Davidson K, Ginn J (eds) Gender and ageing. Open University Press, Maidenhead, pp 127–147Google Scholar
  53. Sen A (1973) On economic inequality. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith J, Fleeson W, Geiselmann B, Settersten R, Kunzmann U (1996) Wohlbefinden im hohen Alter: Vorhersagen aufgrund objektiver Lebensbedingungen und subjektiver Bewertung. In: Mayer KU, Baltes PB (eds) Die Berliner Altersstudie. Akademie Verlag, Berlin, pp 497–523Google Scholar
  55. Smith J, Fleeson W, Geiselmann B, Settersten R, Kunzmann U (1999) Sources of well-being in very old age. In: Mayer KU, Baltes PB (eds) The berlin aging study aging from 70 to 100. A Research Project of the Berlin-Brandenburg Academy of Sciences. Akademie Verlag, Berlin, pp 450–471Google Scholar
  56. Tesch-Römer C, Motel-Klingebiel A (2004) Gesellschaftliche Herausforderungen des demographischen Wandels. In: Kruse A, Martin M (eds) Enzyklopädie der Gerontologie. Hans Huber, Bern, pp 561–575Google Scholar
  57. Tesch-Römer C, von Kondratowitz H-J, Motel-Klingebiel A, Spangler D (2000) OASIS–old age and autonomy: the role of service systems and intergenerational family solidarity. Ergebungsdesign und Instrumente des deutschen Survey (No. Diskussionspapiere Nr. 32). Deutsches Zentrum für Altersfragen, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  58. Tesch-Römer C, Motel-Klingebiel A, Tomasik M (2008) Gender differences in subjective well-being: comparing societies with respect to gender equality. Soc Indic Res 85:329–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Titmuss RM (1963) Essays on ‘the welfare state’. Unwin University Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  60. Titmuss RM (ed) (1987) The philosophy of welfare. Selected Writings of Richard Titmuss. Allen & Unwin, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  61. Treiman DJ (1977) Occupational prestige in comparative perspective. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  62. Veenhoven R (2000) The four qualities of life. J Happiness Stud 1:1–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Walker A (2004) The ESRC Growing Older Research Programme, 1999–2004. Ageing Soc 24:657–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Walker A (2005) A European perspective in quality of life in old age. J Solid State Electrochem 2:2–12Google Scholar
  65. Walker A (2006) Reexamining the political economy of aging: understanding the structure/agency tension. In: Baars J, Dannefer D, Phillipson C, Walker A (eds) Aging, globalization and inequality. Baywood, Amityville, pp 59–80Google Scholar
  66. Weidekamp-Maicher M, Naegele G (2007) Economic resources and subjective well-being in old age. In: Mollenkopf H, Walker A (eds) Quality of life in old age. Kluwer, Boston, pp 65–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. WHOQOL Group (1998) The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Development and General Psychometric Properties. Soc Sci Med 46:1569–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wiggins RD, Higgs PFD, Hyde M, Blane DB (2004) Quality of life in the third age: key predictors of the CASP-19 measure. Ageing Soc 24(5):693–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andreas Motel-Klingebiel
    • 1
    Email author
  • Laura Romeu Gordo
    • 1
  • Jörg Betzin
    • 1
  1. 1.German Centre of Gerontology (DZA)BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations